Jump to content

Dem 1st victory with #BLM |


bhaigan

Recommended Posts

thatha ippudu total merit meede gelavali no more swing white votes to him. I mean 2016 la ga guddi ga guddipadi dobbaru, ippudu alanti chances undavu, thella vaari daggara marpulu chala vachinayi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, bhaigan said:

14611 comments enni comments aa summarize chesi 2 lines lo cheppu bhayya

anni comments evadu chadavamannadu bro.. nenu vesina link topic di ayina kinda okka comment ee kanapadaaley! Nenu rasaanu bro adi.. HypocrisyBuster aney id meeda..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BLM will have no effect on Trump's votes. His major hurdle is corona handling. 

The BLM issue is a sensitive one. Those who feel the riots/protests are all wrong won't voice their opinion. Yes, he may lose some of his vote base. But these forced BLM sessions in work places will make the swing white votes go for trump. 

Corona valla millions have lost their job. This effects so many families. If Trump can get back those jobs and build an anti-China/MAGA sentiment, then he has good chances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, karthik25 said:

BLM will have no effect on Trump's votes. His major hurdle is corona handling. 

The BLM issue is a sensitive one. Those who feel the riots/protests are all wrong won't voice their opinion. Yes, he may lose some of his vote base. But these forced BLM sessions in work places will make the swing white votes go for trump. 

Corona valla millions have lost their job. This effects so many families. If Trump can get back those jobs and build an anti-China/MAGA sentiment, then he has good chances.

swing whites are gone , nenu valla gurinche cheppindi

nenu naa post lo brief ga cheppindi kuda ade thata gelavali ante total merit meede gelavali, ee sari swing votes chala varaku padavu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nee comment deleted, in that thread....

 

but i found it in your profile....posting below...

 

Quote

 

To all the BLM movement supporters:

Firstly, let me state that I do not condone the loss of many lives - regardless of race - because of the senseless and reckless acts of supremacy. These incidents are ghastly, evoke disgust, and trigger a revolution in me. However, unlike you all, who call these incidents racist, I call them police brutality supported by a conniving legal system.

I wish to open up the discussion by asking the following questions. I particularly want the hypocritic tech CEOs sensationalizing this movement to express their opinion on these points - not with empty evading talk but with direct responses.

  • Can you prove George Flyod's color triggered the actions by the four police officers in Minneapolis? Officer Derek Chauvin violated our rights like many arrogant officers across the country. I do not have any doubts he will do the same if there is any person from another race in that situation. Moreover, from the names of other cops involved, they do not fit your definition of "white", who are just caucasians. This is why I, along with many others, have been supporters of the second amendment all along.

  • Police aggression and their violation of our rights and statutes victimized many people across the country. However, a situation gets elevated based on the response from the other party. I, among many of us, have absorbed police aggression and gave up my rights. If any of us choose to stand up for our rights, we will be meted the same fate. Why do not we talk about fixing this aggression?

  • I call the Legal system conniving because they support police aggression by not making a comment even when such behavior is challenged in court. For example, statutes pronounce a defendant to be innocent until proven guilty. When a cop makes a statement without evidence, it is blindly accepted by the judge, even when the defendant challenges the statement - with evidence in many cases. What part of this procedure reflects that burden of proof lies on the prosecution? People are also advised to not argue with the cops in a pullover/an encounter, while the same silence is touted as the person is guilty in the court by a judge. In addition, judges can be disrespectful to a private party but the party cannot reciprocate the behavior else he/she/they will be charged with contempt.

  • If your argument that BLM movement doesn't mean that other lives do not matter. Why wasn't there a race agnostic movement when Srinivas Kuchibhotla, Sureshbhai Patel, or many others working in gas stations were victimized by the violence of cops or african americans? Many such incidents happened against every culture.

  • Why is looting and property damage only existent in BLM movement? Why do not incidents involving other races involve such aggression? Moreover, these thefts are reimbursed with my tax money. If your argument is Blacks were oppressed in US history, other races were also suppressed and enslaved by the Caucasians for generations in their respective countries.

  • I would also highlight the many video evidences that are circulating where Blacks are beating up people mercilessly for protecting their stores. Why isn't there a comment made against such violent incidents? When you do not talk about such incidents, you have no right to say that BLM movement doesn't mean that other lives do not matter. https://www.facebook.com/headlinesinvstigate/videos/679808319234881/

  • The constitution, statutes, and codes of all states do not discriminate based on color or many other factors. College admissions to employment opportunities profile applicants giving an unfair opportunity for many under the name of diversity. Isn't this discrimination and racism?

  • At least there is no law that segregates Blacks from any benefits. However, Immigration law itself profiles people based on nationality [8 U.S.C. 1152 and INA 202]. Why wouldn't you talk about equal rights and unfair treatment? Isn't this racism that is embedded and applied through the law itself?

Let's accept the BLM movement as it is for the debate. What are you expecting from this movement? When a cop or any person has to react in an incident or situation of emergency, you would want them to think further whether the person is being racist because the perpetrator is Black? Why is a Black privy to this special treatment during a judgment call? Isn't this racism against others races, primarily whites? Is it that you want Whites to bow their heads before Blacks and work as slaves to correct history? This cannot happen in a free world. Are you eventually encouraging violence that will lead to a Civil war? During CoViD, you are encouraging people to march for the BLM movement. Until recently, many of you people have instilled fear about CoViD as an immediate threat to many lives, while now you encourage people to march for BLM movement, which is not an immediate risk. Is CoViD or BLM movement race agnostic and pose an immediate threat with greater impact?

There are people who commit good and bad in all races. How can you expect an end to racism when you paint the color of race on every problem? You claim you give the opportunity for everyone to be heard but you rub such hypocritical unilateral opinions on all people, including at workplaces where you advise them to leave their opinions outside. Here is an example on how you respect others' opinion: https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/heres-white-privilege-actually-means-161500911.html

When an opinion is expressed, a barrage of people attack the opinion and when the response involves reasonable blunt comments, they get fired. We no longer live in a free country when you can lose your livelihood for expressing opinions that differ from your's. You control the media with your political ideals and brainwash people through increased occupancy of one race biased comments and movements on social media, and video services such as Prime. You haven't opened the discussion for the quorum before imposing your opinions on everyone. This is fascism.

Problem lies with people who are not accountable for their actions because they are protected by qualified immunity and sovereign immunity. Raise your voice against these aspects. Advocate for a responsible police force. Everyone should be equal before law, including the police, states, and the judiciary. Race is not a problem. Embrace who you are; don't let others dictate your value.
Some opinions if you claim you hear to everyone:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1266995875479355393
https://www.facebook.com/realCandaceOwens/videos/273957870461345/
https://twitter.com/TONYxTWO/status/1269600112310919171
https://twitter.com/nathansbritain/status/1269516971474923520
https://youtu.be/0gwb1VqqVLQ
#HumanHypocrisy #ReverseRacism #VictimRole #PurePolitics #TagATechCEO #BrownSkinOpinion

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...