India's air defence

[kakatiya]

1 hour ago, jalaganna said:

you seem to blabber a lot without a constructive way to articulate what went wrong under Modi, you are either reading too much junk news or too young to not aware of history

GST ruined?? how did you conclude that, its is the most successful implementation that congress tried for 30 yrs

Demo was flawed for ignorant idiots, it has shown many effects if not directly bringing black money, todays India has 60% digital transactions, which means there is trail of transactions, which mean black money is not being produced in economy as it was before demo

Inflation in in US was 10% while it was controlled below 5% in India, have some common sense before talking about inflation, world printed money while Modi did not print, result is India will not experience recession like west

the way covid was handled by india is best in the world, you need to eat something better to improve your iQ

ne entire paragraphs lo insinuations tappa content ledu, next time bring up something constructive and call it research

 

 

Sir in this entire posts these are the insults you throwed at me while saying ->I blabber, I eat something, I follow junk news, improve my iq ?

.. dear @pakeer_saab come up with some new insults ...why throw tantrums while asking me to provide constructive criticism ? Which constructive criticism uses words like junk, idiots and tantrums..clearly displaying hate and triggered short temper as you clearly know your demi God failed utterly as PM , just maintained image good enough to win votes..but for how long this hate raja gets away with his failures. How long blind and wild supporters like you violently hush away criticism like I made ?

You claim demonetization failed because of some idiots ..really and modi ji is not one of those idiots ?

2. India had one of the best covid combat action plan ? Really sir  Do you know how many minimum wage workers suffered because of poor last minute unorganized lockdowns??..

Because of acute vaccine shortage 4000 people died a day in its peak ? You call it , why ..the country pharmaceuticals that supplied covid vaccine to the world suffered in its own soil why ?because of poor leadership ..

As early as August 2020, Modi grandly declared that India had already worked out a vaccine distribution plan. Yet, he placed the first vaccine order as late as January 2021. And, even then, bought little. The result: by the time the second wave hit India with full intensity in April, just 0.5% of Indians had been fully vaccinated

Dabba kottukovadam lo vunna dyasa action lo.ledhu..because he has full belief people like you will still support him blindly..

 

For your info India has registered highest black money in swiss back under his regime and still..it climbed all time high.. 

Go check how gst crippled cottage and small scale industries like chenetha karmikulu.. you guys will never accept because you are fed by hate 

 

 

[kakatiya]

2 hours ago, Mancode said:

Sc cleared him after facing years of trail , how much mental turmoil he faced ,have you imagined 

He asked for troops from neighbouring states ,force saripoka ,congress cmlu kavalane pampaledhu.....

Gujarat riots triggering point is godhra train burning..... Dani gurinchi evar mention cheyaru......

Yes I agree Gujarath riots are triggered by godhra..why don't he agree than..we all know that turned his political image...ask him to admit..that he let the communal violence turn bad to worst by not taking action..asked the dgp to wait 

He allowed the incident to happen and spread like a fire..all he needs is to accept it .

 

Sanjiv Bhatt was a senior police officer in the Gujarat intelligence bureau during the 2002 riots.

In a sworn statement to the Supreme Court, he said that his position allowed him to come across large amounts of information and intelligence both before and during the violence, including the actions of senior administrative officials.

He also alleges that, in a meeting in the night before the riots, Mr Modi told officials that the Muslim community needed to be taught a lesson following an attack on a train carrying Hindu pilgrims

[Mancode]

2 minutes ago, kakatiya said:

Yes I agree Gujarath riots are triggered by godhra..why don't he agree than..we all know that turned his political image...ask him to admit..that he let the communal violence turn bad to worst by not taking action..asked the dgp to wait 

He allowed the incident to happen and spread like a fire..all he needs is to accept it .

 

Sanjiv Bhatt was a senior police officer in the Gujarat intelligence bureau during the 2002 riots.

In a sworn statement to the Supreme Court, he said that his position allowed him to come across large amounts of information and intelligence both before and during the violence, including the actions of senior administrative officials.

He also alleges that, in a meeting in the night before the riots, Mr Modi told officials that the Muslim community needed to be taught a lesson following an attack on a train carrying Hindu pilgrims

Affidavit against Narendra Modi[edit]

After the 2002 riots, a group of social activists had formed the Concerned Citizens Tribunal to analyze the riots. Gujarat's home minister Haren Pandya allegedly told this tribunal that Modi had organised a meeting at the Chief Minister's residence on 27 February 2002, after the Godhra train burning, in which over 63 Hindu pilgrims were killed. According to Pandya, in this meeting, Modi had asked the police officials not to come in the way of "the Hindu backlash". Pandya had named several police officials who attended this meeting; Bhatt was not among these. Pandya was later assassinated by unidentified men.^[14][15]

On 14 April 2011, 9 years after the riots, Bhatt filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court of India, making similar allegations. According to Bhatt, at this meeting on 27 February 2002, Modi asked top police officials to let Hindus "vent out their anger" against the Muslims.^[16] He said that the meeting determined to bring the bodies of the Hindu pilgrims to Ahmedabad before cremation and that he had cautioned against this, fearing religious violence.^[17] According to him, Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Hindu nationalist Bajarang Dal were stirring tensions in the city, and the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) had proposed a bandh (an illegal general strike). Bhatt claimed that the then Director General of Police, K. Chakravarthi, and the city Police Commissioner, P. C. Pandey, had raised concerns regarding the manpower available to deal with this, and both men advised that it was not wise for the bodies to be taken to Ahmedabad.^[18] Bhatt also says that he sent some fax messages to major officials soon after the meeting ended and that these referred to the meeting itself, the decision regarding the bodies of the dead and the growing activity of the BJP and Bajrang Dal.^[19] Subsequently, riots occurred in which around 1000 people died,^[17] three-quarters of whom were Muslim.^[20] Described as a whistleblower both by some of the Indian media and some pressure groups, Bhatt has since referred to the events as "state-sponsored riots"^[21] and has alleged both that Modi told his officials to be "indifferent" towards rioters and said that Muslims needed to be "taught a lesson".^[18]

In his affidavit, Bhatt mentioned six witnesses, who could testify his presence in the alleged meeting held at Modi's residence. He claimed that he had travelled to Modi's residence in the official car of K. Chakravarthi, which was being driven by Tarachand Yadav; Bhatt's driver Constable KD Panth followed them in Bhatt's official car. Bhatt's affidavit was signed by KD Panth, whose statement supported Bhatt's presence at the alleged meeting. On 24 June 2011, Panth filed an FIR against Bhatt, alleging that Bhatt had threatened him and forced him to sign a false affidavit.^[22] Panth alleged that Bhatt took him to the residence of Arjun Modhwadia, the state president of the opposition party, Indian National Congress. He further alleged that Modhwadia asked him to obey Bhatt.^[23] Panth claimed that he was on leave in February 2002, when the riots broke out, and had already told this to the Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT).^[22] Chakravarthi also denied that Bhatt was present in the meeting.^[7]

However, Tarachand Yadav supported Bhatt, stating that he had driven Bhatt to Modi's bungalow, and that Panth had been with them. He also supported Bhatt's claim that he travelled there with Chakravarthy.^[24]

When questioned why he had not made these revelations earlier, Bhatt stated that in 2004, he "started sending out feelers" that he wanted to be cross-examined by the Nanavati Commission, but the commission had not called him.^[7] In May 2011, Bhatt repeated the allegations made in his affidavit when he was called to give evidence to the NMC.^[18] Before this appearance and to support the statements that he would make during it, Bhatt had attempted to obtain documents as evidence from the police and the State Intelligence Bureau, as well as from the SIT hearing.^[25] He again requested this information in December 2011, claiming that it was needed so that it could be placed on the official record. These requests for information failed, and Bhatt alleged that this was because the Modi government opposed them because it was involved in a "cover-up".^[17][26] In 2012, he alleged that the NMC had consistently refused to demand production of the documents, despite Bhatt's belief that it has the legal powers to do so.^[27]

Bhatt's ex-boss R. B. Sreekumar stated that Bhatt had never told him about his presence at the meeting during these nine years. But he told the Nanavati Commission that in 2002, the Modi government had asked the State Intelligence Bureau to tap Haren Pandya's phone to confirm that he was the minister who talked to the Concerned Citizens Tribunal.^[7]

Allegations against SIT ruled baseless[edit]

In March 2008, the Supreme Court had appointed a Special Investigation Team (SIT), headed by former Central Bureau of Investigation chief R. K. Raghavan, to investigate cases relating to the various incidents that had occurred during the 2002 riots. One of those who died in the Gulbarg Society massacre that formed a part of the riots was Ehsan Jaffri, the former Indian National Congress Member of Parliament. His widow, Zakia Jaffri, subsequently became concerned about the involvement of senior officials in allegedly aiding and abetting the rioters and by the lack of legal action against them by the police. She petitioned the Court, alleging criminal conspiracy, a "deliberate and intentional failure" to protect life and property, and failure to fulfil their constitutional duty. In 2009, the Court responded by directing the SIT to investigate the actions of Modi and 62 other people, including Pandey and some VHP leaders.^[28] Bhatt presented evidence to this particular SIT investigation in 2009.^[29]

In his 2011 affidavit, Bhatt accused the SIT of trying to "hide the truth behind the riots".^[30] Bhatt alleged that a mole in SIT leaked information to the Modi Government, through Gujarat's additional advocate general Tushar Mehta. Mehta and Bhatt were good friends since the 1980s, until 2010. Bhatt claimed that he happened to access Mehta's account to book two vacations for their families: one to Goa in September 2009 and another to the US in May–June 2010. At that time, he claims, he saw emails from SIT in Mehta's inbox. Mehta alleged that their friendship ended because of something that happened during their 2010 vacation in the US; he refused to go into details calling it a personal affair. In August 2011, Mehta lodged a complaint against Bhatt, accusing him of hacking into his email account. Bhatt's wife Shweta denied the accusation, stating that her husband only helped Mehta because the latter was not good with computers.^[7]

The Court had previously appointed Raju Ramachandran to act as amicus curiae (friend of the court). Ramachandran had reviewed the original confidential SIT report that had been submitted in November 2010. His report was also confidential but prompted the Court to order the SIT to conduct a self-review. That self-review had been submitted in April 2011^[31] and the Court referred this for consideration by Ramachandran in May, which was also when it refused to accept Bhatt's affidavit.^[32]

In June 2011, Bhatt filed a Public-interest litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court, calling for an independent agency to investigate the riots or, alternatively, for the case to be transferred outside Gujarat.^[33] Bhatt also alleged that his emails had been hacked and filed a complaint against the state alleging that they had been leaked from the SIT.^[34][35]

On 13 October 2015, a bench comprising Supreme Court Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra ruled Bhatt's allegations against the SIT as totally "false and baseless".^[36] It further rebuked Bhatt, ruling that "He had exchanged e-mails with rival political party leaders and was being tutored by the lawyer of an NGO and its activist... The petitioner has even sent e-mails to influence the judicial proceedings of a 3-Judge Bench of this court and has tried to influence the amicus curiae."^[37]

 

 

 

 

^{there ends the matter}

[kakatiya]

12 minutes ago, kakatiya said:

Sir in this entire posts these are the insults you throwed at me while saying ->I blabber, I eat something, I follow junk news, improve my iq ?

.. dear @pakeer_saab come up with some new insults ...why throw tantrums while asking me to provide constructive criticism ? Which constructive criticism uses words like junk, idiots and tantrums..clearly displaying hate and triggered short temper as you clearly know your demi God failed utterly as PM , just maintained image good enough to win votes..but for how long this hate raja gets away with his failures. How long blind and wild supporters like you violently hush away criticism like I made ?

You claim demonetization failed because of some idiots ..really and modi ji is not one of those idiots ?

2. India had one of the best covid combat action plan ? Really sir  Do you know how many minimum wage workers suffered because of poor last minute unorganized lockdowns??..

Because of acute vaccine shortage 4000 people died a day in its peak ? You call it , why ..the country pharmaceuticals that supplied covid vaccine to the world suffered in its own soil why ?because of poor leadership ..

As early as August 2020, Modi grandly declared that India had already worked out a vaccine distribution plan. Yet, he placed the first vaccine order as late as January 2021. And, even then, bought little. The result: by the time the second wave hit India with full intensity in April, just 0.5% of Indians had been fully vaccinated

Dabba kottukovadam lo vunna dyasa action lo.ledhu..because he has full belief people like you will still support him blindly..

 

For your info India has registered highest black money in swiss back under his regime and still..it climbed all time high.. 

Go check how gst crippled cottage and small scale industries like chenetha karmikulu.. you guys will never accept because you are fed by hate 

 

 

@dasari4kntr share your thoughts on how gst crippled small scale industries like chenetha karmikulu and many other  cottage industries and then demonetization crippled it further because of acute shortage 

[kakatiya]

13 hours ago, ZoomNaidu said:

U r clearly showing ur hypocrisy here - the whole India knows who gave the biggest opportunity to Chinkies to dominate Indian regions, and u don’t even have spine to say the actual truth and just shitting some random articles here which fits as per ur ideology. 
 

Again u mentioned multiple times not posting anything related to political but now bringing Manipur riots which shows ur standards !
 

Triggering Bhakths won’t make any difference but showing hatred on someone by omitting the naked truths will make u actual Andh honestly even in your real life !! 
 

Russia war ni 1 hour stop chesaada ledha ani pakkana pedithey successful ga akkada struck ayina students ni theesukochaaru and there r so many countries praising him/India for the same where as ur ideology batch trying to make fun of it just Bcoz of hatredness !! 

For 45 years chinkies didn't even attack one soldier suddenly occupies our grazing grounds..kills our soldiers and converts in to buffer zones..and it is still not failure of modi ji..wow !!! Little did modi ji expect that he will fail in same lines as Nehru but takes criticism away.. wow.. can't even retaliates and criticizes Nehru who retaliated .. Nehru failed and remains as failed in India China panchasheel..so do modi sir..but he has zero guts to agree in his failed foreign policies which will continue to add more damage as he puts his image first , countries next

[kakatiya]

On 6/20/2020 at 12:11 AM, kakatiya said:

The Nikkei India Services Purchasing Managers’ Index was at 46.7 in November, a report showed on Monday, the lowest since December 2013 and below the 50-mark that indicates a contraction. Services contribute about 60 percent to the $2 trillion economy, dragging down the composite PMI to 49.1, the lowest since March 2014. Reports last week showed manufacturing will also slow in the final months of 2016 after a disappointing July-September GDP growth. This is 2016.

Our manufacturing went down and hit rock bottom in 2019.  And so Rafael Deal.

So this according to pakeer Saheb is not constructive criticism ..this is politics according to zoomnaidu and it is hypocrisy too.. 

This is what actual hypocrisy  is 

Modi sir claims about fight against humanity right abuses and freedom of speech during g7 summits..but at same time uapa act misuse , 72% increase in arrests to shutdown the freedom of speech in India under his regime.

 

Prime characteristic of modi ji is hypocrisy 

 

 

 

 

[kakatiya]

1 hour ago, Mancode said:

Affidavit against Narendra Modi[edit]

After the 2002 riots, a group of social activists had formed the Concerned Citizens Tribunal to analyze the riots. Gujarat's home minister Haren Pandya allegedly told this tribunal that Modi had organised a meeting at the Chief Minister's residence on 27 February 2002, after the Godhra train burning, in which over 63 Hindu pilgrims were killed. According to Pandya, in this meeting, Modi had asked the police officials not to come in the way of "the Hindu backlash". Pandya had named several police officials who attended this meeting; Bhatt was not among these. Pandya was later assassinated by unidentified men.^[14][15]

On 14 April 2011, 9 years after the riots, Bhatt filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court of India, making similar allegations. According to Bhatt, at this meeting on 27 February 2002, Modi asked top police officials to let Hindus "vent out their anger" against the Muslims.^[16] He said that the meeting determined to bring the bodies of the Hindu pilgrims to Ahmedabad before cremation and that he had cautioned against this, fearing religious violence.^[17] According to him, Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Hindu nationalist Bajarang Dal were stirring tensions in the city, and the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) had proposed a bandh (an illegal general strike). Bhatt claimed that the then Director General of Police, K. Chakravarthi, and the city Police Commissioner, P. C. Pandey, had raised concerns regarding the manpower available to deal with this, and both men advised that it was not wise for the bodies to be taken to Ahmedabad.^[18] Bhatt also says that he sent some fax messages to major officials soon after the meeting ended and that these referred to the meeting itself, the decision regarding the bodies of the dead and the growing activity of the BJP and Bajrang Dal.^[19] Subsequently, riots occurred in which around 1000 people died,^[17] three-quarters of whom were Muslim.^[20] Described as a whistleblower both by some of the Indian media and some pressure groups, Bhatt has since referred to the events as "state-sponsored riots"^[21] and has alleged both that Modi told his officials to be "indifferent" towards rioters and said that Muslims needed to be "taught a lesson".^[18]

In his affidavit, Bhatt mentioned six witnesses, who could testify his presence in the alleged meeting held at Modi's residence. He claimed that he had travelled to Modi's residence in the official car of K. Chakravarthi, which was being driven by Tarachand Yadav; Bhatt's driver Constable KD Panth followed them in Bhatt's official car. Bhatt's affidavit was signed by KD Panth, whose statement supported Bhatt's presence at the alleged meeting. On 24 June 2011, Panth filed an FIR against Bhatt, alleging that Bhatt had threatened him and forced him to sign a false affidavit.^[22] Panth alleged that Bhatt took him to the residence of Arjun Modhwadia, the state president of the opposition party, Indian National Congress. He further alleged that Modhwadia asked him to obey Bhatt.^[23] Panth claimed that he was on leave in February 2002, when the riots broke out, and had already told this to the Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT).^[22] Chakravarthi also denied that Bhatt was present in the meeting.^[7]

However, Tarachand Yadav supported Bhatt, stating that he had driven Bhatt to Modi's bungalow, and that Panth had been with them. He also supported Bhatt's claim that he travelled there with Chakravarthy.^[24]

When questioned why he had not made these revelations earlier, Bhatt stated that in 2004, he "started sending out feelers" that he wanted to be cross-examined by the Nanavati Commission, but the commission had not called him.^[7] In May 2011, Bhatt repeated the allegations made in his affidavit when he was called to give evidence to the NMC.^[18] Before this appearance and to support the statements that he would make during it, Bhatt had attempted to obtain documents as evidence from the police and the State Intelligence Bureau, as well as from the SIT hearing.^[25] He again requested this information in December 2011, claiming that it was needed so that it could be placed on the official record. These requests for information failed, and Bhatt alleged that this was because the Modi government opposed them because it was involved in a "cover-up".^[17][26] In 2012, he alleged that the NMC had consistently refused to demand production of the documents, despite Bhatt's belief that it has the legal powers to do so.^[27]

Bhatt's ex-boss R. B. Sreekumar stated that Bhatt had never told him about his presence at the meeting during these nine years. But he told the Nanavati Commission that in 2002, the Modi government had asked the State Intelligence Bureau to tap Haren Pandya's phone to confirm that he was the minister who talked to the Concerned Citizens Tribunal.^[7]

Allegations against SIT ruled baseless[edit]

In March 2008, the Supreme Court had appointed a Special Investigation Team (SIT), headed by former Central Bureau of Investigation chief R. K. Raghavan, to investigate cases relating to the various incidents that had occurred during the 2002 riots. One of those who died in the Gulbarg Society massacre that formed a part of the riots was Ehsan Jaffri, the former Indian National Congress Member of Parliament. His widow, Zakia Jaffri, subsequently became concerned about the involvement of senior officials in allegedly aiding and abetting the rioters and by the lack of legal action against them by the police. She petitioned the Court, alleging criminal conspiracy, a "deliberate and intentional failure" to protect life and property, and failure to fulfil their constitutional duty. In 2009, the Court responded by directing the SIT to investigate the actions of Modi and 62 other people, including Pandey and some VHP leaders.^[28] Bhatt presented evidence to this particular SIT investigation in 2009.^[29]

In his 2011 affidavit, Bhatt accused the SIT of trying to "hide the truth behind the riots".^[30] Bhatt alleged that a mole in SIT leaked information to the Modi Government, through Gujarat's additional advocate general Tushar Mehta. Mehta and Bhatt were good friends since the 1980s, until 2010. Bhatt claimed that he happened to access Mehta's account to book two vacations for their families: one to Goa in September 2009 and another to the US in May–June 2010. At that time, he claims, he saw emails from SIT in Mehta's inbox. Mehta alleged that their friendship ended because of something that happened during their 2010 vacation in the US; he refused to go into details calling it a personal affair. In August 2011, Mehta lodged a complaint against Bhatt, accusing him of hacking into his email account. Bhatt's wife Shweta denied the accusation, stating that her husband only helped Mehta because the latter was not good with computers.^[7]

The Court had previously appointed Raju Ramachandran to act as amicus curiae (friend of the court). Ramachandran had reviewed the original confidential SIT report that had been submitted in November 2010. His report was also confidential but prompted the Court to order the SIT to conduct a self-review. That self-review had been submitted in April 2011^[31] and the Court referred this for consideration by Ramachandran in May, which was also when it refused to accept Bhatt's affidavit.^[32]

In June 2011, Bhatt filed a Public-interest litigation (PIL) in the Supreme Court, calling for an independent agency to investigate the riots or, alternatively, for the case to be transferred outside Gujarat.^[33] Bhatt also alleged that his emails had been hacked and filed a complaint against the state alleging that they had been leaked from the SIT.^[34][35]

On 13 October 2015, a bench comprising Supreme Court Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra ruled Bhatt's allegations against the SIT as totally "false and baseless".^[36] It further rebuked Bhatt, ruling that "He had exchanged e-mails with rival political party leaders and was being tutored by the lawyer of an NGO and its activist... The petitioner has even sent e-mails to influence the judicial proceedings of a 3-Judge Bench of this court and has tried to influence the amicus curiae."^[37]

 

 

 

 

^{there ends the matter}

Sir you clearly mentioned that godhra train Incident by extremists Muslims  triggered the riots ..and people will continue to say that ..because that's the truth ..

Haji Bilal Sujela (61), a prime accused in the Sabarmati Express Carnage case of 2002 that triggered one of the worst communal riots in Gujarat

this guy was also let go by the same court because of lack of evidence !!!  But that doesn't mean he is not culprit..he still is..

 

then why do bjp followers still bring extremists mob burning godhra train ? Because that's the truth ..

WE all know modi ji became nations attention as he openly gave message he will not tolerate such Muslim attacks under his rule .. then why to play this hide and seek and not claim modi is not a raja of hate equally..that's whole agenda..he just needs reason to spit venom of hate and they will find issues like Kerala stories, hijab to bring communal tension ..and make Hindu to Muslims fight for his vote bank...

 

they tried to invoke communal  violence in Delhi too to kick aap out of rule ..but wasn't that successful. 

[Mancode]

1 minute ago, kakatiya said:

Sir you clearly mentioned that godhra train Incident by extremists Muslims  triggered the riots ..and people will continue to say that ..because that's the truth ..

Haji Bilal Sujela (61), a prime accused in the Sabarmati Express Carnage case of 2002 that triggered one of the worst communal riots in Gujarat

this guy was also let go by the same court because of lack of evidence !!!  But that doesn't mean he is not culprit..he still is..

 

then why do bjp followers still bring extremists mob burning godhra train ? Because that's the truth ..

WE all know modi ji became nations attention as he openly gave message he will not tolerate such Muslim attacks under his rule .. then why to play this hide and seek and not claim modi is not a raja of hate equally..that's whole agenda..he just needs reason ..

 

they tried to invoke communal  violence in Delhi too to kick aap out of rule ..but wasn't that successful. 

and for next 20 years there is not a single riot in gujarat 

bjp followers a , where this word came from 

 a party directly involved in riots ante 1984 sikh riots(congress) , but congress is secular for everyone

[kakatiya]

23 minutes ago, Mancode said:

and for next 20 years there is not a single riot in gujarat 

bjp followers a , where this word came from 

 a party directly involved in riots ante 1984 sikh riots(congress) , but congress is secular for everyone

The party elected same sikh for 14 years as prime minister.. and what did bjp do ? Same hijab.. citizenship bill.. and again bought khalisthan issue to front page after 1984.. 

That is exactly what this country doesn't need to be..another 1984 nationalist movement where sikhs are massacred...another gujarath ..another babri masjid....but bjp with it cell and semitism posts against minorities ..citizenship bills...is exactly what they try to do..bring another communal burning issue ..since ram.janma bhoomi is settled..they need some Hindu Muslim issue to stay relevant for other 20 -30 years.

[Mancode]

1 minute ago, kakatiya said:

The party elected same sikh for 14 years as prime minister.. and what did bjp do ? Same hijab.. citizenship bill.. and again bought khalisthan issue to front page after 1984.. 

That is exactly what this country doesn't need to be..another 1984 nationalist movement where sikhs are massacred...another gujarath ..another babri masjid....but bjp with it cell and semitism posts against minorities ..citizenship bills...is exactly what they try to do..bring another communal burning issue ..since ram.janma bhoomi is settled..they need some Hindu Muslim issue to stay relevant for other 20 -30 years.

sikh pm , but remote control is in italian hand 

what is wrong with banning hijad . are you progressive or islamic fundamentalist ??? why women want to be discriminated ??

CAA has nothing to do with indian citizens, it is only for giving citizenship to minorities who are coming from pak, afghan , bangladesh , what is wrong in it , hindus are murdered , raped everyday in those countries , if country like india which is a hindu majority nation doesnt stand up for those people, then who will????

babri masjid should be demolished becoz it is a invader built mosque on his name , the birthplace place where lord ram  temple was present was destroyed by mughals and built a mosque , govt did nothing on it , supreme court gave the land to hindus in 150 yr long dispute , what is ur problem in it???

its not about hindu muslim issue , ram is cultral icon of india ....... , anduke telikundane mem rama rajyam testham ani all parties promose testhai , anduke ramudu name movies lo vadtharu ramudu name casual ga , it has nothing do with religion

[Mancode]

hashimpura massacre ani congress govt lo chidambaram saradaga 50 muslims ni kalchi champamanadu telsa niku @kakatiya

[kakatiya]

12 minutes ago, Mancode said:

hashimpura massacre ani congress govt lo chidambaram saradaga 50 muslims ni kalchi champamanadu telsa niku @kakatiya

Yes that is wrong .if there any government right now that want massacres like that happen again for vote bank is bjp run under modi..not atal bihari vajpayee either. It would have been different progressive bjp not retrogress.

[Mancode]

9 minutes ago, kakatiya said:

Yes that is wrong .if there any government right now that want massacres like that happen again for vote bank is bjp run under modi..not atal bihari vajpayee either. It would have been different progressive bjp not retrogress.

congress cannot maintain law and order,so most of riots happend in their ruling

[ZoomNaidu]

@kakatiya - thammudu it’s obvious that u lost  ur common sense, U better to say the thread is abt Crying on Modi and no one wouldn’t even care but Research, thokka tho fakirs antu agenda tho hatred okkatey kanipisthundhi née posts valla !

 

[dasari4kntr]

7 hours ago, kakatiya said:

@dasari4kntr share your thoughts on how gst crippled small scale industries like chenetha karmikulu and many other  cottage industries and then demonetization crippled it further because of acute shortage 

@kakatiya నీకో చిన్న సలహా…don’t waste your energy….