chanchala Posted August 14, 2020 Report Share Posted August 14, 2020 1 minute ago, ChinnaBhasha said: will that qualify for being called as goddess ani @Catalpha asking.. in that case eeroju nundi husband ni challenge emundi, avsaramite urikinchi kodta ani @Catalpha db ki challenge throwing she's daughter of bhoomata kadha. kid of god is god.simple. then why is karna, bheema, arjuna etc not god ani adagaku. wait for another 500yrs... they will become gods too. they just need much more fleshed out backstory, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChinnaBhasha Posted August 14, 2020 Report Share Posted August 14, 2020 1 minute ago, chanchala said: Who says Tirumala was a vaishnavaite center then? let the pujaris allow for the idol in tirumala to be examined to verify its authenticity shankaracharya wrote on vishnu aa? are you trying to troll me or something? bajagovindam was written by sankaracharya.. something top of my mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chanchala Posted August 14, 2020 Report Share Posted August 14, 2020 5 minutes ago, VenkyBabu said: Lol 😂 adi shankaracharya was born in around 4th century ... by that time itself there’s a temple in tirumala . He visited that he penned many strotras on Vishnu & lakshmi. I said 500bc.. shankaracharya was born 1000 yrs after that date range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chanchala Posted August 14, 2020 Report Share Posted August 14, 2020 4 minutes ago, ChinnaBhasha said: bajagovindam was written by sankaracharya.. something top of my mind ok. I think a lot of people with the name shankara over 100s of yrs.. everything is attributed to adi sankara to give it authenticity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChinnaBhasha Posted August 14, 2020 Report Share Posted August 14, 2020 1 minute ago, chanchala said: she's daughter of bhoomata kadha. kid of god is god.simple. then why is karna, bheema, arjuna etc not god ani adagaku. wait for another 500yrs... they will become gods too. they just need much more fleshed out backstory, our school teacher used to say mahatma Gandhi will become a God in couple of centuries 😀 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iriswest Posted August 14, 2020 Report Share Posted August 14, 2020 1 hour ago, Catalpha said: Chauvinist kadu, because he wrote how Rama loves Seeta a lot, and even respects her. But I don't understand why Rama likes Seeta, because all that Valmiki describes about Seeta is that she is pretty, daniki minchi character arc ivvaledu. So Ramuduki Seeta andam nachindani anukovala? Radha/Lakshmi/Padmavathi evariki peddaga character arcs levu. It just tells us to worship the virtue. But it’s nothing to be looked down upon. Sita survived Ravana harassing her without giving up. She raised her 2 sons all by herself. She did not crave for any luxuries of a queen and set sail for vanvas along with Ram. She stayed strong where ever she could. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iriswest Posted August 14, 2020 Report Share Posted August 14, 2020 3 minutes ago, chanchala said: she's daughter of bhoomata kadha. kid of god is god.simple. then why is karna, bheema, arjuna etc not god ani adagaku. wait for another 500yrs... they will become gods too. they just need much more fleshed out backstory, They are sons of kunti and panduraju who are not gods. Karna was half god. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chittimallu_14 Posted August 14, 2020 Report Share Posted August 14, 2020 skimmed through first couple of pages and expected someone to respond but no one did. Sita Devi was a Goddess not because of Ramayana... but because she was an incarnation of Goddess Lakshmi Devi... She was already a Goddess before even getting married to Rama, she didnt become one because she was loyal to her husband.... neeku aa vlogs ee correct poi avi esko 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IdleBrain Posted August 14, 2020 Report Share Posted August 14, 2020 1 hour ago, ShruteSastry said: Yes, as a novel it's a very well written book based on already existing locations. It could as well existing persons.. (if not gods).. If you tone down some exaggerations, everything is realistic... so the story may be based on real chars live3d during those times.. While it passes it onto generations, there might be some of the facts change, refine or exaggerate... Same with Mahabharata.. its very much possible... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dasari4kntr Posted August 14, 2020 Report Share Posted August 14, 2020 indakati nunchi ee doubt tega kottestundhi....adagakunda vundalenu... 1. The Vishnu Purana, the Brahma Purana and the Bhagavata Purana, in the episode of the killing of the demon Narakasura by Krishna avatar of Vishnu, mentions that he was the son of Varaha and the earth goddess Bhudevi 2. lord rama is avatar of vishnu and varaha murthy also avatar of lord vishnu.. 3. sita devi is daughter of Bhudevi ..sorry if i hurt any of our friends feelings... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChinnaBhasha Posted August 14, 2020 Report Share Posted August 14, 2020 1 minute ago, IdleBrain said: It could as well existing persons.. (if not gods).. If you tone down some exaggerations, everything is realistic... so the story may be based on real chars live3d during those times.. While it passes it onto generations, there might be some of the facts change, refine or exaggerate... Same with Mahabharata.. its very much possible... Might be the case.. people might have exaggerated the things over the time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chanchala Posted August 14, 2020 Report Share Posted August 14, 2020 Just now, IdleBrain said: It could as well existing persons.. (if not gods).. If you tone down some exaggerations, everything is realistic... so the story may be based on real chars live3d during those times.. While it passes it onto generations, there might be some of the facts change, refine or exaggerate... Same with Mahabharata.. its very much possible... if you take away the exaggerations, the story is a bland story of two panchayats fighting over a piece of land. its the mythology behind the story that gives its beauty and meaning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VenkyBabu Posted August 14, 2020 Report Share Posted August 14, 2020 Ikkada cheppina waste. But chepthunna seethamma ayonija... thanaki birth antu ledhu ... seethamma lakshmi devi swaroopam anadaniki ramayanam lo chala chotla rujuvulu untayi 1. ravanudu seethamma ni kaneesam touch kuda cheyyaleka pothadu... okka Gaddi paraka theesukoni seethamma dhanni dhati Nuvvu ravoddhu ante. Manavamathrulaki adhi sadhyam kadhu 2. lanka lo unnnani rojulu she Did not even take any food ... ala 1 year ela undagalaru? Mamulu manushulu ayithe? 3. Agni pravesham 4. shivadhanussu ni onti chettho etthi janakudni ascharya parachadam ame husband ki entha loyal ga undho... husband kuda ameni anthe preminchevadu andhuke kalisinundedhi enni rojulayina seetharamulla kalisi undandi ani dheevistharu pelli manthrallo kuda “seetharamabhyam namah... vani hiranyagarbhabhyam namah.... shachi purandharaabhyam namah.... “ ani chadhivedhi Andhuke ..... ramayanam anedhi scripture la chusina manavallu cheppedhi entante ala bathakandi ani ... kutumba vyavastha lo ramudi la Oka kodukuga, annaga, bharthaga, thandriga naluguriki adarshamga undali ani 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chanchala Posted August 14, 2020 Report Share Posted August 14, 2020 1 minute ago, dasari4kntr said: indakati nunchi ee doubt tega kottestundhi....adagakunda vundalenu... 1. The Vishnu Purana, the Brahma Purana and the Bhagavata Purana, in the episode of the killing of the demon Narakasura by Krishna avatar of Vishnu, mentions that he was the son of Varaha and the earth goddess Bhudevi 2. lord rama is avatar of vishnu and varaha murthy also avatar of lord vishnu.. 3. sita devi is daughter of Bhudevi ..sorry if i hurt any of our friends feelings... analyzing religion is a waste of time. you just believe it to hold to something in life, and don't harm another person that's good enough. most religious people are decent. but half baked religious people become fascist assholes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChinnaBhasha Posted August 14, 2020 Report Share Posted August 14, 2020 1 minute ago, chanchala said: if you take away the exaggerations, the story is a bland story of two panchayats fighting over a piece of land. its the mythology behind the story that gives its beauty and meaning. more simply it's a family dispute Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.gif.343fe49c7e1c507ae0056326bd8cf77e.gif)
Recommended Posts