Kancha Ilaiah's new article on sakshi is praising Modi anta ga..

[futureofandhra]

Just now, chanchala said:

i answered your quechen. 

okay you hate financial based conversions... but I am willing to convert for 5000rs. is it not my wish to convert? who are you to stop me? will you give me that 5000?

anyway financial based conversions don't even happen that much. and if they did, its fine too. They are just feeding a need, like any market force. RSS are free to fill that space too. and RSS is doing it in tribal areas.

people are freee to propagate their religion bro. Its a free country. 

you are hiding your religious bigotry under the mask of secularism kadha.

propagate religion is different to financial conversion

i oppose ani cheppanu anthey  its individual choice 

u never answered which means u do not like iliah

[chanchala]

1 minute ago, futureofandhra said:

propagate religion is different to financial conversion

i oppose ani cheppanu anthey  its individual choice 

u never answered which means u do not like iliah

I do not know ilaiah other than that he's notorious in hindutva circles.

[summer27]

some of the excerpts from his books..

“In Hindu households, open discussions about sexual experience are totally out of place. Mothers can never discuss their sex life with daughters.” (p.17)

“No Brahmin lady could author a book. How come the goddess of learning herself remain unlettered? It is the direct outcome of the cruelty and the devilishness of Brahminism.” (p.94)

“Vishnu reclining on the serpent is an indication of his inhumanness. Goddess Laxmi has a full hand in the plots hatched by Vishnu against the Dalitbahujans. Should any Dalitbahujan individual acquire wealth, or turn against the caste system, Goddess Laxmi spies on them and informs Vishnu. Then Vishnu kills them with his Vishnu chakra (disc).” (p.96)

“Siva and Parvati are probably girijans. But Parvati also works against Dalitbahujans in tandem with Laxmi and Saraswati.” (p. 98)

“A large number of Brahmins came along with Sita, Rama and Laxmana to overthrow and usurp the Adivasi Republics and independent Bahujan kingdoms. They killed Tataka and usurped her kingdom. They also murdered Sambuka and occupied his kingdom.” (p.107)

[chanchala]

Just now, summer27 said:

some of the excerpts from his books..

“In Hindu households, open discussions about sexual experience are totally out of place. Mothers can never discuss their sex life with daughters.” (p.17)

“No Brahmin lady could author a book. How come the goddess of learning herself remain unlettered? It is the direct outcome of the cruelty and the devilishness of Brahminism.” (p.94)

“Vishnu reclining on the serpent is an indication of his inhumanness. Goddess Laxmi has a full hand in the plots hatched by Vishnu against the Dalitbahujans. Should any Dalitbahujan individual acquire wealth, or turn against the caste system, Goddess Laxmi spies on them and informs Vishnu. Then Vishnu kills them with his Vishnu chakra (disc).” (p.96)

“Siva and Parvati are probably girijans. But Parvati also works against Dalitbahujans in tandem with Laxmi and Saraswati.” (p. 98)

“A large number of Brahmins came along with Sita, Rama and Laxmana to overthrow and usurp the Adivasi Republics and independent Bahujan kingdoms. They killed Tataka and usurped her kingdom. They also murdered Sambuka and occupied his kingdom.” (p.107)

haha... 

[futureofandhra]

1 minute ago, chanchala said:

I do not know ilaiah other than that he's notorious in hindutva circles.

with this article it does not seem anymore

[summer27]

“The fight was between the minority Pandavas (Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Vaisyas were always a minority – they constitute 15% of the population) and the majority Kauravas. The hundred Kauravas stood against Brahminical Dharma and represented Dalit bahujans, whereas the five Pandavas represented the Brahminical minority. In the fight for land (and for the kingdom) Krishna stands by the minority. The majority were not willing to give up the land they acquired through sweat and blood."

[chanchala]

Just now, futureofandhra said:

with this article it does not seem anymore

I just read the title. lol. i'm lazy.

it'll take me an hour to read the entire thing if I tried.

[chanchala]

1 minute ago, summer27 said:

“The fight was between the minority Pandavas (Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Vaisyas were always a minority – they constitute 15% of the population) and the majority Kauravas. The hundred Kauravas stood against Brahminical Dharma and represented Dalit bahujans, whereas the five Pandavas represented the Brahminical minority. In the fight for land (and for the kingdom) Krishna stands by the minority. The majority were not willing to give up the land they acquired through sweat and blood."

the guy is atleast funny.

[futureofandhra]

Just now, chanchala said:

I just read the title. lol. i'm lazy.

it'll take me an hour to read the entire thing if I tried.

from when u turned as bhakth?

[summer27]

“How do the Baapana and Komati youngsters learn the human and sexual relationships? Probably when they go to temples and while performing puja, their boys and girls get an opportunity to mingle. In fact, in our younger days, we did not know about the social aspect of those families.” (p.9)

[chanchala]

Just now, futureofandhra said:

from when u turned as bhakth?

??

[Silveradotwo]

2 minutes ago, summer27 said:

“The fight was between the minority Pandavas (Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Vaisyas were always a minority – they constitute 15% of the population) and the majority Kauravas. The hundred Kauravas stood against Brahminical Dharma and represented Dalit bahujans, whereas the five Pandavas represented the Brahminical minority. In the fight for land (and for the kingdom) Krishna stands by the minority. The majority were not willing to give up the land they acquired through sweat and blood."

Joke a krishna is yadav he is hero in entire film

[summer27]

“We do not know anything about the kind of words used by Baapana, Komati, Kshatriya children while learning to form the mutual social relationships within the Hindu fold. I only came to know later in my life that the Brahmin children are never sent to the field, do not ask them to tend to cattle, to look after harvest, that they are sent to school while quite young. I never knew that they hate mud, soil, cow, buffalo, sheep, oxen, etc.” (p.13-14)

[chanchala]

1 minute ago, summer27 said:

“How do the Baapana and Komati youngsters learn the human and sexual relationships? Probably when they go to temples and while performing puja, their boys and girls get an opportunity to mingle. In fact, in our younger days, we did not know about the social aspect of those families.” (p.9)

he is consistently pushing boundaries and making an arse of himself then. lol.

[summer27]

“That a father in the traditional Baapana household never physically touches his children was not known to me until my Baapana mates told me.” (p.14)