Rama theertham temple destroyed in vizianagaram

[narsy]

1 minute ago, Killer66 said:

vorayi anta neat ga crystal clear ga cheppa kadha ra oka line ardam chesukoleva ?

 babari masjib kinda hindu temple artifacts vunayi ani and dated long time back . ni kosamey bold kooda chesha susuko 

nenu adigindhi headline kaadhu ra yedhava. ippudu nenu daani gurinchi search chesi, nee blanks ni fill in cheyyaala?

naaku verey pani paata ledhu anukunnava?

[Killer66]

1 minute ago, narsy said:

nenu adigindhi headline kaadhu ra yedhava. ippudu nenu daani gurinchi search chesi, nee blanks ni fill in cheyyaala?

naaku verey pani paata ledhu anukunnava?

oryani headline kaadhu ra babu neeku time ledhu anav kadha andukane one line lo vesha yedhava 

 

Muhammed, for the first time on December 15, 1990, claimed that during excavations he saw the remains of the temple.

“There were numerous shreds of evidence which showed that the Mosque was built not only over the temple, but some remains of the temple were used to construct a mosque,” Muhammed said.

“For instance, the walls of the mosque were constructed with the support of 14 pillars of Ram temples. And below these pillars, I saw the pinnacle of a temple of 11th-12th century,” Muhammed recollected.

He said that had the Supreme Court not upheld the ASI excavation report, his claim would always have been seen as a piece of lies and concocted stories.

“It is a highly balanced and perfect judgment. It is a judgement you cannot improve upon. It is something which we all were dreaming of,” Muhammed said.

He further said that during his two-months stay in Ayodhya for excavation in 1976-77, he was awed to see the fervour with which devotees come to visit the temple.

[narsy]

3 minutes ago, Killer66 said:

oryani headline kaadhu ra babu neeku time ledhu anav kadha andukane one line lo vesha yedhava 

 

Muhammed, for the first time on December 15, 1990, claimed that during excavations he saw the remains of the temple.

“There were numerous shreds of evidence which showed that the Mosque was built not only over the temple, but some remains of the temple were used to construct a mosque,” Muhammed said.

“For instance, the walls of the mosque were constructed with the support of 14 pillars of Ram temples. And below these pillars, I saw the pinnacle of a temple of 11th-12th century,” Muhammed recollected.

He said that had the Supreme Court not upheld the ASI excavation report, his claim would always have been seen as a piece of lies and concocted stories.

“It is a highly balanced and perfect judgment. It is a judgement you cannot improve upon. It is something which we all were dreaming of,” Muhammed said.

He further said that during his two-months stay in Ayodhya for excavation in 1976-77, he was awed to see the fervour with which devotees come to visit the temple.

arey endhi ra idhi? idhi archealogical evidence aa? thoooooooooooooo

[Sachin200]

1 minute ago, narsy said:

arey endhi ra idhi? idhi archealogical evidence aa? thoooooooooooooo

SC judges kooda teliyaledhu antav 

[narsy]

2 minutes ago, Sachin200 said:

SC judges kooda teliyaledhu antav 

SC rejected that bs claim.. the thing he posted claims that SC accepted ASI report. No, they did not.

[Killer66]

Just now, narsy said:

arey endhi ra idhi? idhi archealogical evidence aa? thoooooooooooooo

vorayi nuvu em ana pm or cm anukuna neeku evidence chupinchadanike,  Muhammed is indian archaelogical department lo Superintending Archaeologist proofs ani court ki / govt ki chupistharu kani neeku enduku chupistharu ra lafoot, indaka varaku matter veyi anav , matter veshaka evidence kavali antav, evidence esthey eee evidence akkadike ani gaurantee enti antav item key ball as i said before your mind is prefixed and can see the facts or  digest the truth .

[Killer66]

What are KK Muhammed's clamis?

Across several instances since the original excavation endeavour, Muhammed has maintained that the Babri Masjid mosque was built over the remains of a temple. He has noted that BB Lal's team discovered that 12 pillars of the mosque were actually built from the pre-existing structures that belonged to a temple. 

In more recent interviews, he has spoken of identifying a 'Purna Kalasha' or water pitcher – an artefact commonly found in 12th and 13th century temples, and believed to be a symbol of prosperity in Hinduism. 

Muhammed also discussed finding terracotta sculptures in the shapes of human beings and animals, stating that these also pointed to the existence of a temple, since such depictions were forbidden in Islam. He has also asserted that during the second excavataion, over 50 pillar bases across 17 rows were discovered, in addition to the 12 temple pillars found in the first. 

Another structure, reportedly, found was a 'makara pranali' with a crocodile face. Crocodiles, he has said, were a symbol of the river Ganga, with such depictions found en route to the 'garbha griha' (sanctum sanctorum) of some temples. He has said that such an artefact is exclusively seen in temples. 

[narsy]

5 minutes ago, Killer66 said:

vorayi nuvu em ana pm or cm anukuna neeku evidence chupinchadanike,  Muhammed is indian archaelogical department lo Superintending Archaeologist proofs ani court ki / govt ki chupistharu kani neeku enduku chupistharu ra lafoot, indaka varaku matter veyi anav , matter veshaka evidence kavali antav, evidence esthey eee evidence akkadike ani gaurantee enti antav item key ball as i said before your mind is prefixed and can see the facts or  digest the truth .

vorey... sollu aapu ra.. all this is not acceptable proof.

SC completely threw that ASI report out. oorikey sollu oddu.

SC gave its judgement purely on emotional basis. no facts. nothing.

[narsy]

2 minutes ago, Killer66 said:

What are KK Muhammed's clamis?

Across several instances since the original excavation endeavour, Muhammed has maintained that the Babri Masjid mosque was built over the remains of a temple. He has noted that BB Lal's team discovered that 12 pillars of the mosque were actually built from the pre-existing structures that belonged to a temple. 

In more recent interviews, he has spoken of identifying a 'Purna Kalasha' or water pitcher – an artefact commonly found in 12th and 13th century temples, and believed to be a symbol of prosperity in Hinduism. 

Muhammed also discussed finding terracotta sculptures in the shapes of human beings and animals, stating that these also pointed to the existence of a temple, since such depictions were forbidden in Islam. He has also asserted that during the second excavataion, over 50 pillar bases across 17 rows were discovered, in addition to the 12 temple pillars found in the first. 

Another structure, reportedly, found was a 'makara pranali' with a crocodile face. Crocodiles, he has said, were a symbol of the river Ganga, with such depictions found en route to the 'garbha griha' (sanctum sanctorum) of some temples. He has said that such an artefact is exclusively seen in temples. 

so this fcukface makes up a new claim everytime he's interviewed aa? lol.

[Killer66]

1 minute ago, narsy said:

so this fcukface makes up a new claim everytime he's interviewed aa? lol.

adi neeku nachanide evaru chepina fuckface anuko, vadhu choosinde cheptunadhu vaaaa , indaka article lo half vundey edi inko article lo mana press gurinche telusu kadha nee laga half half knowledge gallu vuntaru.

[Mirage]

16 minutes ago, narsy said:

SC rejected that bs claim.. the thing he posted claims that SC accepted ASI report. No, they did not.

“He said that had the Supreme Court not upheld the ASI excavation report, his claim would always have been seen as a piece of lies and concocted stories.” oh deeni meaning SC rejected anatta. Good to know

[Killer66]

10 minutes ago, narsy said:

vorey... sollu aapu ra.. all this is not acceptable proof.

SC completely threw that ASI report out. oorikey sollu oddu.

SC gave its judgement purely on emotional basis. no facts. nothing.

The five-judge bench of the Supreme Court unanimously pronounced its verdict on 9 November 2019.^[29][30] The judgement can be summarised as follows:-^{[31][32][33][34]}

• The Court ordered the Government of India to create a trust to build the Ram Mandir temple and form a Board of Trustees within three months. The disputed land will be owned by the Government of India and subsequently transferred to the Trust after its formation.
• The Court ordered the entire disputed land of area of 2.77 acres to be allocated for the construction of a temple while an alternative piece of land of area of 5 acres be allocated to the Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board for the construction of a mosque at a suitable place within Ayodhya.
• The Court ruled that the 2010 Allahabad High Court's decision, division of the disputed land was incorrect.
• The Court ruled that the Demolition of the Babri Masjid and the 1949 desecration of the Babri Masjid was in violation of law.
• The Court observed that archaeological evidence from the Archaeological Survey of India shows that the Babri Masjid was constructed on a "structure", whose architecture was distinctly indigenous and non-Islamic.

edi ra chepinde SC nuvu brain lo yedi fix ithey adi chepadhu court halwey key ball

[narsy]

1 minute ago, Killer66 said:

adi neeku nachanide evaru chepina fuckface anuko, vadhu choosinde cheptunadhu vaaaa , indaka article lo half vundey edi inko article lo mana press gurinche telusu kadha nee laga half half knowledge gallu vuntaru.

SC has rubbished his argument. ofcourse SC is not the final arbiter of such issues. and I'm open to changing my mind on this.

But this is not the way to present proof. Its childish. I'm not talking about you. I'm talking about that asshole KK Mohammad. 

He should present it in a scientific way, not make up cockd and bull stories about random structures. 

and there's many other ways to prove this. via literature. Time has passed dude. Now the temple is being built.

and It'll be remembered until couple of generations atleast that HIndu goons destroyed a mosque to build their temple. No one cares what happened 500yrs earlier. only dumbfcuks do.

lets hope Hindu society in 100yrs will be better than what we are today.

[narsy]

2 minutes ago, Mirage said:

“He said that had the Supreme Court not upheld the ASI excavation report, his claim would always have been seen as a piece of lies and concocted stories.” oh deeni meaning SC rejected anatta. Good to know

are you like fcuking dumb, to copy and paste something that I specifically said was a wrong claim in my following posts?

SC did not uphold the ASI report. Its common knowledge.

[Killer66]

3 minutes ago, Mirage said:

“He said that had the Supreme Court not upheld the ASI excavation report, his claim would always have been seen as a piece of lies and concocted stories.” oh deeni meaning SC rejected anatta. Good to know

antey bro veedu , pre programmed brain tho vuntadhu or else  denial mode vuntadhu malli db ki vachi yedava trash anta spread chesthadhu .