Jump to content

Rama theertham temple destroyed in vizianagaram


NiranjanGaaru

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Killer66 said:
  • The Court observed that archaeological evidence from the Archaeological Survey of India shows that the Babri Masjid was constructed on a "structure", whose architecture was distinctly indigenous and non-Islamic.

edi ra chepinde SC nuvu brain lo yedi fix ithey adi chepadhu court halwey key ball

mee bathukulaki, ippudu Babri masjid judgement direct ga choopettaali anukunta.

ayna siggu lekunda argue chestaremo.. choopiyaala?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, narsy said:

are you like fcuking dumb, to copy and paste something that I specifically said was a wrong claim in my following posts?

SC did not uphold the ASI report. Its common knowledge.

mari edi enti ra

 

  • The Court observed that archaeological evidence from the Archaeological Survey of India shows that the Babri Masjid was constructed on a "structure", whose architecture was distinctly indigenous and non-Islamic.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, narsy said:

are you like fcuking dumb, to copy and paste something that I specifically said was a wrong claim in my following posts?

SC did not uphold the ASI report. Its common knowledge.

Enduku ra frustrate avthunav. You obviously edited your post. If you’re honest enough you would’ve admitted that you have erred. But that’s too much to expect from an asshole like you

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, narsy said:

mee bathukulaki, ippudu Babri masjid judgement direct ga choopettaali anukunta.

ayna siggu lekunda argue chestaremo.. choopiyaala?

siggu lekunda nuvey kadha topic nuche inko topic ki jumping, orayi adi official dhi ra, wiki lo kooda vuntundi choodu, malla nii liberal media channels tesukuni vachi edi judgement ani chepaku 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Killer66 said:

mari edi enti ra

 

  • The Court observed that archaeological evidence from the Archaeological Survey of India shows that the Babri Masjid was constructed on a "structure", whose architecture was distinctly indigenous and non-Islamic.

Nuvvu enni chupichina vaadi delusional world la vaadu brathukutaadu.. piccha naayala gaadu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mirage said:

Enduku ra frustrate avthunav. You obviously edited your post. If you’re honest enough you would’ve admitted that you have erred. But that’s too much to expect from an asshole like you

I edited it because I assumed that the report claimed that ASI was not accepted by SC, which I know is true since I remember it well.

then I read the thing again, and was surprised that they claim that SC upheld ASI report.

what's there to admit, dumbfcuk? do you understand how logic works?

are you now claiming that ASI report was accepted or rejected by SC? because I'm confused what you are mocking me for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mirage said:

Nuvvu enni chupichina vaadi delusional world la vaadu brathukutaadu.. piccha naayala gaadu

nenu adey cheptuna, pity endi antey vadu delusional lo vunadhu ani vadike telusu but bayataki ralekapotunadhu . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Killer66 said:

siggu lekunda nuvey kadha topic nuche inko topic ki jumping, orayi adi official dhi ra, wiki lo kooda vuntundi choodu, malla nii liberal media channels tesukuni vachi edi judgement ani chepaku 

arey babri masjid judgement was not based on ASI report. SC did not uphold the report. lol.

brainless pakodi laaga, nuvvu aa mirage gaadu edho vaaguthunnaru.. 

wait babri masjid judgement thavvutha... wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, narsy said:

I edited it because I assumed that the report claimed that ASI was not accepted by SC, which I know is true since I remember it well.

then I read the thing again, and was surprised that they claim that SC upheld ASI report.

what's there to admit, dumbfcuk? do you understand how logic works?

are you now claiming that ASI report was accepted or rejected by SC? because I'm confused what you are mocking me for.

Ne bonda ra. Neeku argument cheyyaneeki chaathakaadu. Frustration thoni edo vaaguthav. Dashabdam nundi ide sollu vaaguthu kaalam gadipesthunav

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, narsy said:

I edited it because I assumed that the report claimed that ASI was not accepted by SC, which I know is true since I remember it well.

then I read the thing again, and was surprised that they claim that SC upheld ASI report.

what's there to admit, dumbfcuk? do you understand how logic works?

are you now claiming that ASI report was accepted or rejected by SC? because I'm confused what you are mocking me for.

Ade confusion lo continue aipo..baaga set aithadi neeku

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, narsy said:

so this fcukface makes up a new claim everytime he's interviewed aa? lol.

Court ASI report lo temple dates back to 13 the century 

Report lacks reasons for destruction of pre-existing or the pre-existing one was destructed for the construction of mosque. Also four centuries time gap evidence ledhu 

But originally akkada temple undhi from the ASI report annaru and it should be read contextually Ani anaru 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, narsy said:

arey babri masjid judgement was not based on ASI report. SC did not uphold the report. lol.

brainless pakodi laaga, nuvvu aa mirage gaadu edho vaaguthunnaru.. 

wait babri masjid judgement thavvutha... wait.

orayi aaa statement echinde sc nennu post cheshinde but judgement based on right to faith , yepudu right to faith ana dani consider cheyadam enta nijamo ala kinda statement kooda antey nijam 

 

  • The Court observed that archaeological evidence from the Archaeological Survey of India shows that the Babri Masjid was constructed on a "structure", whose architecture was distinctly indigenous and non-Islamic.

 

ni lanti prefixed brain galu direct ga cheputhey frustration tho sachipotharu ani evidence kani pistundi ani chepinde SC. lekapothey eee patikey BP tho poye vadive.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mirage said:

Ne bonda ra. Neeku argument cheyyaneeki chaathakaadu. Frustration thoni edo vaaguthav. Dashabdam nundi ide sollu vaaguthu kaalam gadipesthunav

nee bondha... frustration emundhi ra bochhu.. I'm just amused at how dumb you guys are.

you claim that SC accepted ASI report. and now you are afraid to state it, because you know its not true.

SC did not accept ASI report sare na.

lol dumbfucks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, narsy said:

nee bondha... frustration emundhi ra bochhu.. I'm just amused at how dumb you guys are.

you claim that SC accepted ASI report. and now you are afraid to state it, because you know its not true.

SC did not accept ASI report sare na.

lol dumbfucks. 

Alaage. Ala continue aipo ne bubble lo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...