Jump to content

Rama theertham temple destroyed in vizianagaram


NiranjanGaaru

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Sachin200 said:

Court ASI report lo temple dates back to 13 the century 

Report lacks reasons for destruction of pre-existing or the pre-existing one was destructed for the construction of mosque. Also four centuries time gap evidence ledhu 

But originally akkada temple undhi from the ASI report annaru and it should be read contextually Ani anaru 

so does it mean that SC upheld ASI report?'

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arey @narsy ga nuvvu elaagu em sadvav,   Poni sagam sagam sadivina daantla padi paisalu kuda ardam ayi saavadu neeku.. adkenchi idkenchi erkochina sollu post chesthav.. iga malla emanna ante maatram rosham podsukosthadi.. ela ra ila aithe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mirage said:

Alaage. Ala continue aipo ne bubble lo

yes... naa bubble lo Modi oka maha purushudu... India oka great country, destined for greatness.. inka

Ram temple was demolished for building a masjid. 

anthe na, inka emanna undha?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, narsy said:

yes... naa bubble lo Modi oka maha purushudu... India oka great country, destined for greatness.. inka

Ram temple was demolished for building a masjid. 

anthe na, inka emanna undha?

Neeku ela comfortable aithe ala

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mirage said:

Arey @narsy ga nuvvu elaagu em sadvav,   Poni sagam sagam sadivina daantla padi paisalu kuda ardam ayi saavadu neeku.. adkenchi idkenchi erkochina sollu post chesthav.. iga malla emanna ante maatram rosham podsukosthadi.. ela ra ila aithe

nenu sadavanu le.. adhem kottha kaadhu...

kaani nuvvu edho sadivi podichesnattu build up isthuntey navvosthundhi bossu.

antha tekku ekkad nundi osthadi? matter emi lekunda minimum...

edho temple proof ante, edho kothaga chepthademo anukunte, same rotta SC judgement lo undey chethha malla rehash cheyyatam endhi ra babu.

adhi already lite ani SC nay cheppesaaru ga..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sachin200 said:

As per asi report ,  temple undhi anadhi consider chesaru. 

meaningless consideration, without an understanding of what happened to it. means there is no proof ani artham annai.

andukey SC stayed clear of making any pronouncements on this matter

just andaru ishtamochinatttu vaalla own claims cheskuntunnaru... anthe

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, narsy said:

meaningless consideration, without an understanding of what happened to it. means there is no proof ani artham annai.

andukey SC stayed clear of making any pronouncements on this matter

just andaru ishtamochinatttu vaalla own claims cheskuntunnaru... anthe

 

 

neeku nachithey meaningful nakapothey meaningless antey ga  pedda tedha gadive ra nuvu 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Killer66 said:

neeku nachithey meaningful nakapothey meaningless antey ga  pedda tedha gadive ra nuvu 

already cheppina neeku, that SC is not the arbiter for these kind of arguments ani. 

nuvvu proof ani cheppi, malli chethha techhav..

aa mirage gaadu edho kanipettinattu vaadochhi oka sollu.

ASI report should be peer reviewed and be accepted as legitimate in anthropological depts. anything less than that, is not proof.

SC did not consider the report in its judgement. They cannot. It did not conclude anything that the hindutva side claims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, narsy said:

already cheppina neeku, that SC is not the arbiter for these kind of arguments ani. 

nuvvu proof ani cheppi, malli chethha techhav..

aa mirage gaadu edho kanipettinattu vaadochhi oka sollu.

ASI report should be peer reviewed and be accepted as legitimate in anthropological depts. anything less than that, is not proof.

SC did not consider the report in its judgement. They cannot. It did not conclude anything that the hindutva side claims.

mari deni meaning endi ra

 

  • The Court observed that archaeological evidence from the Archaeological Survey of India shows that the Babri Masjid was constructed on a "structure", whose architecture was distinctly indigenous and non-Islamic.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, narsy said:

already cheppina neeku, that SC is not the arbiter for these kind of arguments ani. 

nuvvu proof ani cheppi, malli chethha techhav..

aa mirage gaadu edho kanipettinattu vaadochhi oka sollu.

ASI report should be peer reviewed and be accepted as legitimate in anthropological depts. anything less than that, is not proof.

SC did not consider the report in its judgement. They cannot. It did not conclude anything that the hindutva side claims.

as excepted denial mode as always no one can match stupidness of yours . enjoy your bubble scpk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Killer66 said:

mari deni meaning endi ra

 

  • The Court observed that archaeological evidence from the Archaeological Survey of India shows that the Babri Masjid was constructed on a "structure", whose architecture was distinctly indigenous and non-Islamic.

it means nothing ra. enni saarlu cheppaali? it means absolutely nothing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...