సీఎం హోదాలో తిరుమల వెళ్లే వ్యక్తి డిక్లరేషన్ ఇవ్వాల్సిన అవసరం లేదు: జగన్ పై కేసులో హైకోర్టు తీర్పు

[ChinnaBhasha]

Just now, Vaampire said:

1 min time spend chesi declaration form meedha sign cheyyadaniki jaggadiki G balupu. 

Daaniki malli court lo petition. Proceedings.  Court time and people money waste

politicians they are.. they will try to avoid this kind of declarations  

[aakathaai789]

1 minute ago, ChinnaBhasha said:

yes ra inka manalni aapetodu ledu

Aadevadu eedevadu jaganannaki edhuru evadu

[Vaampire]

3 minutes ago, ChinnaBhasha said:

politicians they are.. they will try to avoid this kind of declarations  

How this it change. Vaadu Christian Ani state motham telusu

[tom bhayya]

1 minute ago, aakathaai789 said:

Aadevadu eedevadu jaganannaki edhuru evadu

Tirumala lo inka official ga biddalu poyi pracharam chesukovachu antaava 

[tom bhayya]

Just now, Vaampire said:

How this it change. Vaadu Christian Ani state motham telusu

23% of AP are Christians but officially less than 3% , reservation ki govt padhakaalaki original caste cheppukodaaniki Christian 

[Vaampire]

Just now, tom bhayya said:

23% of AP are Christians but officially less than 3% , reservation ki govt padhakaalaki original caste cheppukodaaniki Christian 

My question was different.

Jaggad Christian Ani state motham telusu. Vaadi hardcore supporters ki kooda telusu.

Adhey mukka declaration form lo rasthey vachina nastam enti vaadiki?

[Anta Assamey]

Ante Hodha (Position and Power) ni batti rules apply avutayi ani High Court cheptunda ?? ... 

[snoww]

23 minutes ago, tom bhayya said:

Court is like uscis it relies on documentation only mana documentation strong undaali 

Court relies on Google search results ani judge rakesh briefed kada vuncle ninna.

Google sesthe thelisi poyedi kada jalaganna religion. 

[tom bhayya]

40 minutes ago, Vaampire said:

My question was different.

Jaggad Christian Ani state motham telusu. Vaadi hardcore supporters ki kooda telusu.

Adhey mukka declaration form lo rasthey vachina nastam enti vaadiki?

Firstly vaadu cm kaakamundhu kuda velladu tirumala but no one asked vaadu cm ayyaka TTD vallu separate ga oka notice pettaru no need for declaration ani that’s the controversy. Yv subba reddy swami bakthi chupiddham ani kori thechukunna controversy idhi . Vaadi kosam rules marchaaru ani 

[tom bhayya]

37 minutes ago, snoww said:

Court relies on Google search results ani judge rakesh briefed kada vuncle ninna.

Google sesthe thelisi poyedi kada jalaganna religion. 

Lol avunu Jagan anna ki idhi avamaanam AP hc lo undi judge ki Jagan anna Entha cotton seed oo theliyakapovadam 

[Sachin200]

9 minutes ago, tom bhayya said:

Firstly vaadu cm kaakamundhu kuda velladu tirumala but no one asked vaadu cm ayyaka TTD vallu separate ga oka notice pettaru no need for declaration ani that’s the controversy. Yv subba reddy swami bakthi chupiddham ani kori thechukunna controversy idhi . Vaadi kosam rules marchaaru ani 

Petindhey Mana jaggu visit tarvatha in 2012

 

Non-Hindus to sign faith form to enter Tirumala temple in Andhra Pradesh

The decision was taken in the wake of recent controversy over the entry of YSR Congress Party chief Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy, a devout Christian, into the temple.

 

 

The Tirumala temple in Andhra Pradesh.

 

The Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD), which manages the affairs of the country's richest temple of Tirumala in Andhra Pradesh, has now banned the entry of all non-Hindus into the temple, if they do not declare their faith in Lord Venkateshwara, the presiding deity 

 

[Sachin200]

Observation of the Court:

On Right to Freedom of Religion and meaning of a Professing Christian

The bench while interpreting a person's right to freedom of religion under Art. 25 was of the view that "The individual right contained in Article 25 of the Constitution guarantees to every person the freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion subject to public order, health and morality. Therefore, it is clear that subject to the restrictions imposed in the Article 25, every person has a fundamental right under the constitution not merely to entertain such religious belief but to exhibit its belief and ideas as are enjoyed or sanctioned by this religion and further to propagate his religious views for the edification of the others."

 

 

 

Further, the bench interpreted the provisions of the Act dealing with Admission of Non-Hindus into the Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams Temples contained in Rule 136 of the Act. While doing so, the Court analyzed the meaning of "professing a religion" and who is a "Hindu". The bench relied on the case of Punjabrao vs. Dr. D.P.Meshram & Ors. (1965) wherein the Supreme Court held that the word professing means to avow publicly; to make an open declaration, to declare one's belief, to profess Christ and to accept into a religious order. On the point of the meaning of being a Hindu, the court relied on Sastri Yagnapurushadji & Ors. v. Muldas Bhudardas Vaishya (1966) where the Court examined the broad features of Hindu religion, after tracing the historical and etymological genesis of the word 'Hindu' to river Sindhu otherwise known Indus.

 

After analyzing the decisions on the subject, the bench took note of the point that the Supreme Court has described the Hindu religion as a way of life based on certain basic concepts. While considering the meaning of "Professing Christian religion", the bench referred to Sec. 3 of the Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 which defines the meaning of Christian and Native Christians. "Any person professing the Christian religion is a Christian for the purpose of the said Act and Christian residence of Natives of India converted to Christianity as well as such converts are classified as Native Christians. Baptism is the sacrament by which a person is admitted into the Church of Christ and it is not only a sign and distinguished mark of the Christian profession." The bench observed.

 

On Entry of Respondents (Non Hindus) to the Temple

The Court observed that the petitioner failed to show any material evidence on record which establishes that the Respondent (Y S Jaganmohan Reddy) is a professing Christian. Therefore, the allegations of the petitioner were not entertained by the bench. The bench also noted that merely attending the Christian Gospel conventions and attending the prayers in Churches, one cannot be considered as a Christian.

 

"Recently, the respondent has participated in the prayers in Gurudwara at Vijayawada. Can he be treated as professing the "Sikh" religion? Does one become a "Christian" just by having a biblical name or just by attending a Church sermon? Can one be called as a 'Christian' just because they read the Bible or have the Crucifix in their house? Admittedly, the answer will be negative." The Court observed.

 

Further, the Court also noted that there is a State tradition from years to invite the serving Chief Ministers for offering prayers to Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams temples to present "Pattu Vastralu" during Brahmotsavam as per the procedure provided under "Kainkarya Patti". "In the opinion of this Court, he entered into the Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam's temples, in the capacity of the Chief Minister of the State, as a representative of the people of the state, and as such, he need not submit a declaration as provided under Rule 136 of the Rules." The court held.

 

However, the bench clarified that if the respondent visits the temple in his personal capacity, it shall be mandatory for him to submit the declaration under the Rule.

The Bench dismissed the petition and did not go into the allegations made by the petitioners due to the failure of producing any backing evidence.

Case Name: Alokam Sudhakar Babu v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. W.P. No. 17616 of 2020

 

[tom bhayya]

12 minutes ago, Sachin200 said:

Petindhey Mana jaggu visit tarvatha in 2012

 

Non-Hindus to sign faith form to enter Tirumala temple in Andhra Pradesh

The decision was taken in the wake of recent controversy over the entry of YSR Congress Party chief Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy, a devout Christian, into the temple.

 

 

The Tirumala temple in Andhra Pradesh.

 

The Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD), which manages the affairs of the country's richest temple of Tirumala in Andhra Pradesh, has now banned the entry of all non-Hindus into the temple, if they do not declare their faith in Lord Venkateshwara, the presiding deity 

 

2012 lo evaru ruling? That rule eppatinundo undhi but governor narasimhan aa rule legal cheyyali ani tried. 2016 thatavatha kuda Jagan visited but no one expect kalyan babu made a scene of it. Again let me iterate yv subba reddy said declaration not required ani annapuudey issue started 

[ChinnaBhasha]

1 hour ago, Vaampire said:

My question was different.

Jaggad Christian Ani state motham telusu. Vaadi hardcore supporters ki kooda telusu.

Adhey mukka declaration form lo rasthey vachina nastam enti vaadiki?

Repu ela untundo evadiki telsu. enduku maname declarations ichukoni tarvata irukkovadam ani jagananna policy

[Vaampire]

28 minutes ago, tom bhayya said:

Firstly vaadu cm kaakamundhu kuda velladu tirumala but no one asked vaadu cm ayyaka TTD vallu separate ga oka notice pettaru no need for declaration ani that’s the controversy. Yv subba reddy swami bakthi chupiddham ani kori thechukunna controversy idhi . Vaadi kosam rules marchaaru ani 

Uncle I am not talking about the rule.

Okka declaration form fill cheyyadaniki jagga ki antha G balupu enduku anedhi naa question