Alekhya was very learned and follower of OSHO

[Dosakai]

1 minute ago, betapilli said:

Logical reasoning is thought in highschool. You're saying aliens are not real because you didn't see them. The fact that you didn't see them doesn't mean they don't exist, it just means you haven't searched them enough. 

I'm the asshole who purposefully failed highschool. and then repeated the trick in graduation too.

you must be right if you say it is right. since you were obviously a keener student than I ever was.

[Lonelyloner]

I might be a neanderthal reincarnated as human in this generation

[RSUCHOU]

2 minutes ago, Lonelyloner said:

How do we know if we are in last incarnation?

Any possibility?

According to Hinduism, you would know if it were.  You would not be asking questions about whether it is your last incarnation if you are in your last. By then, all this would stop bothering you. So, if the reincarnation is a true phenomenon, I am sure, I am not in my last. I still have a lot of attachments/jealousy/anger/ego etc. Identifying with nature as one is the defined as a stage you reach when you are devoid of all ego, attachments, jealousy, emotion.

[Dosakai]

1 minute ago, RSUCHOU said:

According to Hinduism, you would know if it were.  You would not be asking questions about whether it is your last incarnation if you are in your last. By then, all this would stop bothering you. So, if the reincarnation is a true phenomenon, I am sure, I am not in my last. I still have a lot of attachments/jealousy/anger/ego etc. Identifying with nature as one is the defined as a stage you reach when you are devoid of all ego, attachments, jealousy, emotion.

Brahmin is the last incarnation, duh!!

special people with special powers

[RSUCHOU]

Just now, Dosakai said:

Brahmin is the last incarnation, duh!!

special people with special powers

Naah,.. No one is special. If someone really believes in Hinduism, they would know that Brahmins are not special people. Infact, Bhakta Kannappa was no Brahmin, the Spider/Snake and elephant that attained moksha in Srikalahasti were not even human, Sabari was no brahmin. The Brahmin supremacy was a later day evil spread during the mid 17th to 19th century. 

[DummyVariable]

18 minutes ago, betapilli said:

How can you logically prove that God doesn't exist? 

Can you prove a universal negative? 

[betapilli]

4 minutes ago, Dosakai said:

Brahmin is the last incarnation, duh!!

special people with special powers

 

 

[Dosakai]

Just now, RSUCHOU said:

Naah,.. No one is special. If someone really believes in Hinduism, they would know that Brahmins are not special people. Infact, Bhakta Kannappa was no Brahmin, the Spider/Snake and elephant that attained moksha in Srikalahasti were not even human, Sabari was no brahmin. The Brahmin supremacy was a later day evil spread during the mid 17th to 19th century. 

whatever you say. I don't believe in any of this anyway. especially in rebirth. good luck.

[betapilli]

2 minutes ago, DummyVariable said:

Can you prove a universal negative? 

I don't know what that is.  

[Amrita]

1 hour ago, RSUCHOU said:

I am not sure where you got that from. Aham Brahmasmi and Tat tvam asi are not the same sentence. They are from the mahavakyas of advaitha philosophy. And also, Tat Tvam Asi ante you are that ani kadhu. Thou art that ante ikkada reference is with Sat, the eternal truth. The four maha vakyas are, Prajnanam Brahma/Ayam Atma Brahma/Tat Tvam Asi & Aham Brahsmi. The Advaitha philosophy is defined by the 4 mahavakyas and all of them say the same thing. Jiva is not different from Aatma and both are the same and a part of the whole which is brahma.

Just to clear further, Tat Tvam Asi is from sama veda and Aham Brahmasmi is from Yajur Veda. The manifestation is represented in multiple forms. In Hinduism there are several schools of thought. Dvaita philosophy which treats the JivaAtma and brahman as separate entities and brahman is independent while Jivatma is dependendent of the independent. After the raise of Budhism in the middle ages, Adi Sankaracharya took up the task of debating and bringing back the glory of Hinduism. He proposed the Advaita Vedanta.

Aham Brahmasmi is loosely translated to I am god. But, that is to be looked in with the context. Hinduism treats Sat as the extreme manifestation of Brahman and vice versa. Ekam Sat, Vipra Bahuda vadanti. Truth is one,learned call it by many names. So, the multiplicity of Gods is inherent. That is the difference in mono theistic religions and Hindutva. The Hindutva philosophy lends itself to Jivatma and believes in oneness with nature which is the exreme end goal and called nirvana. So, if someone is able to identify that there is brahman in every being in the nature, they donot have to say Aham Brahsmi again. Also, Brahman is not God, it is the truth and oneness with truth. A lot of us Indians, do a self slap action when our leg hits a paper or someone else. That is in recognition of the fact that the brahman exists in every being. 

Hindutva is not about egos or God. It is about self and self realization. This is what I understood from whatever I have read so far.

Aham brahmasmi tatva masi anedi maha vakyam . I have taken this maha vakyam too.  I got it from my guru. I have no opika now but i can talk on it some other time.

[Dosakai]

3 minutes ago, betapilli said:

 

 

what about it?

[Amrita]

53 minutes ago, betapilli said:

I am God anukunte ok, but God dumbbell tho tala enduku pagalagodathadu?

In this particular case mental patients kabatti or may be something went wrong in the family. Spirituality valla evaru evarini champaru they will be more sensitive towards fellow humans, animals or any living species. Spirituality says to see paramatma in every thing and everyone and that there is nothing which isnt you and there is nothing to be afraid of. Inka prema ga undali pranalu teyaleru. 

[RSUCHOU]

Well, for people who ask every Atheist to prove that God does not exist, I would say, read what Atheist is all about. He/She does not believe in God because there is no definitive proof that God exists. So, to prove an Atheist wrong, the theists are tasked to find proof that God exists and the proof to stand the test of Atheists's cross examination. Atheist cannot be tasked with bringing proof to your party.  

[DummyVariable]

5 minutes ago, betapilli said:

I don't know what that is.  

Do you think unicorns exist?

[undarware_troller]

15 minutes ago, Lonelyloner said:

I might be a neanderthal reincarnated as human in this generation

The messenger looks cute ani @Daaarling pinged @Pappu_Packitmar