Supreme Court agrees to dismiss challenge to Trump public charge rule

[csrcsr]

The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to a Biden administration request to dismiss an upcoming case challenging the Trump’s administration’s "public charge" rule, which limited access to green cards for those deemed likely to accept public assistance.

The court had agreed last month to hear challenges to the 2018 rule, but the Biden administration in its request noted that all parties had agreed to ask the court to toss the case.

The request signaled that the White House is likely to scrap the rule on its own. The rule had been challenged by numerous states and advocacy groups who argued it amounted to a wealth test for immigrants. The latest federal government filings were appeals that had been brought by the Trump administration.

The Biden administration has taken a similar posture in other major immigration cases, convincing the court to cancel hearings on cases challenging former President Trump’s border wall and his changes to the asylum process.

It has already mandated a review of the public charge rule by the Department of Homeland Security in an early February executive order.

The rule has already been tied up in litigation for years, with the Supreme Court previously setting aside other lower court injunctions freezing it.

“Immigrant families can now access life-saving health care, food, and housing assistance for which they are eligible without fear that they will lose the chance to obtain lawful permanent residence, because the actions today mean that the harmful Trump public charge rule will again be blocked,” the Legal Aid Society, Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc. and others who had challenged the rule said in a release Tuesday.

• Minnesota Supreme Court won't hear appeal to drop third-degree murder...
• Third-degree murder charge reinstated in Derek Chauvin trial

“The Trump rule erected an invisible wall in the form of a wealth test that discriminated against people on the basis of race as a condition for regularizing their immigration status. ...And because of the public charge rule, immigrant families have been living in fear of using essential benefits like healthcare, despite serving as frontline workers who have been among those hardest hit by COVID-19.”

While critics say the rule has blocked those who may qualify for food stamps or other social safety nets, the Trump administration argued it was in the best interest of the United States to ensure immigrants could be self-sufficient.

Updated at 3:07 p.m.

[csrcsr]

Enni forms enni printouts tipincharu raa

[snoww]

2 minutes ago, csrcsr said:

Enni forms enni printouts tipincharu raa

So No need to file form i944 now ?

[csrcsr]

19 minutes ago, snoww said:

So No need to file form i944 now ?

Yaaa inka USCIS guide lines raledu but vastaundochu bro soon in some weeks time

[ShruteSastry]

32 minutes ago, csrcsr said:

The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to a Biden administration request to dismiss an upcoming case challenging the Trump’s administration’s "public charge" rule, which limited access to green cards for those deemed likely to accept public assistance.

The court had agreed last month to hear challenges to the 2018 rule, but the Biden administration in its request noted that all parties had agreed to ask the court to toss the case.

The request signaled that the White House is likely to scrap the rule on its own. The rule had been challenged by numerous states and advocacy groups who argued it amounted to a wealth test for immigrants. The latest federal government filings were appeals that had been brought by the Trump administration.

The Biden administration has taken a similar posture in other major immigration cases, convincing the court to cancel hearings on cases challenging former President Trump’s border wall and his changes to the asylum process.

It has already mandated a review of the public charge rule by the Department of Homeland Security in an early February executive order.

The rule has already been tied up in litigation for years, with the Supreme Court previously setting aside other lower court injunctions freezing it.

“Immigrant families can now access life-saving health care, food, and housing assistance for which they are eligible without fear that they will lose the chance to obtain lawful permanent residence, because the actions today mean that the harmful Trump public charge rule will again be blocked,” the Legal Aid Society, Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc. and others who had challenged the rule said in a release Tuesday.

• Minnesota Supreme Court won't hear appeal to drop third-degree murder...
• Third-degree murder charge reinstated in Derek Chauvin trial

“The Trump rule erected an invisible wall in the form of a wealth test that discriminated against people on the basis of race as a condition for regularizing their immigration status. ...And because of the public charge rule, immigrant families have been living in fear of using essential benefits like healthcare, despite serving as frontline workers who have been among those hardest hit by COVID-19.”

While critics say the rule has blocked those who may qualify for food stamps or other social safety nets, the Trump administration argued it was in the best interest of the United States to ensure immigrants could be self-sufficient.

Updated at 3:07 p.m.

not sure what this is, but how is this a Trump Rule..is he a Dictator?

i think rules come from Agencies. These news outlets still living on his name.

[csrcsr]

4 minutes ago, ShruteSastry said:

not sure what this is, but how is this a Trump Rule..is he a Dictator?

i think rules come from Agencies. These news outlets still living on his name.

Under his administration ani kabolu , lite bro what is important to us is thats a waste documentation fo 500 pages unnecessary for EB categories , less clutter for future applicants and no need to worry about credit score and crap 

[no01]

public charge ante GC's can now start claiming govt benefits ah? like health, medical, unemployment etc? 

 

[ShruteSastry]

10 minutes ago, csrcsr said:

Under his administration ani kabolu , lite bro what is important to us is thats a waste documentation fo 500 pages unnecessary for EB categories , less clutter for future applicants and no need to worry about credit score and crap 

credit score aa, and 500 pages good god. Glad then its removed.

[JackSeal]

56 minutes ago, csrcsr said:

The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to a Biden administration request to dismiss an upcoming case challenging the Trump’s administration’s "public charge" rule, which limited access to green cards for those deemed likely to accept public assistance.

 

 

The court had agreed last month to hear challenges to the 2018 rule, but the Biden administration in its request noted that all parties had agreed to ask the court to toss the case.

 

 

The request signaled that the White House is likely to scrap the rule on its own. The rule had been challenged by numerous states and advocacy groups who argued it amounted to a wealth test for immigrants. The latest federal government filings were appeals that had been brought by the Trump administration.

The Biden administration has taken a similar posture in other major immigration cases, convincing the court to cancel hearings on cases challenging former President Trump’s border wall and his changes to the asylum process.

It has already mandated a review of the public charge rule by the Department of Homeland Security in an early February executive order.

The rule has already been tied up in litigation for years, with the Supreme Court previously setting aside other lower court injunctions freezing it.

“Immigrant families can now access life-saving health care, food, and housing assistance for which they are eligible without fear that they will lose the chance to obtain lawful permanent residence, because the actions today mean that the harmful Trump public charge rule will again be blocked,” the Legal Aid Society, Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc. and others who had challenged the rule said in a release Tuesday.

• Minnesota Supreme Court won't hear appeal to drop third-degree murder...
• Third-degree murder charge reinstated in Derek Chauvin trial

“The Trump rule erected an invisible wall in the form of a wealth test that discriminated against people on the basis of race as a condition for regularizing their immigration status. ...And because of the public charge rule, immigrant families have been living in fear of using essential benefits like healthcare, despite serving as frontline workers who have been among those hardest hit by COVID-19.”

While critics say the rule has blocked those who may qualify for food stamps or other social safety nets, the Trump administration argued it was in the best interest of the United States to ensure immigrants could be self-sufficient.

Updated at 3:07 p.m.

Public charge rule should be there, to filter of people who relied on public money while on non immigrant visa.

[ShruteSastry]

1 minute ago, JackSeal said:

Public charge rule should be there, to filter of people who relied on public money while on non immigrant visa.

idhi kuda alochansakyam gane undi kada, why would an immigrant use govt money? When you choose to come here and work/study.

[csrcsr]

2 minutes ago, JackSeal said:

Public charge rule should be there, to filter of people who relied on public money while on non immigrant visa.

Agreed bro but for why EB categories, if you dont have a job you are not there , you are illegal the moment you dont have a job and already h1 and L1 have some base pay set with LCA , you will never be a public charge with those wages

[csrcsr]

1 minute ago, ShruteSastry said:

idhi kuda alochansakyam gane undi kada, why would an immigrant use govt money? When you choose to come here and work/study.

Family olu kontha mandini , ikkada vallu  agencies utter ga misuse chstaru anta  valani tisukoni poyi food stamps, unemployment etc etc benefits ki enroll chestaru anta oka package laga

[csrcsr]

24 minutes ago, no01 said:

public charge ante GC's can now start claiming govt benefits ah? like health, medical, unemployment etc? 

 

no no bro this rule intakamundu public chareg avutavo emo ani pedda questionare unde bro they removed that, GCs can always avail benefits like unemplloyment etc already

[Sucker]

Ee 4 years lo yentha Mandi veelaithe antha Mandi ni dimpaali India nundi antunna @r2d2