England Yuvaraju joins Silicon Valley startup as senior executive

[betapilli]

1 minute ago, DummyVariable said:

Poverty impacts self esteem and one’s ability to be successful. You end up with invisible glass ceilings in your mind and are more prone to be a victim later on in life. Let us not compare; just appreciate the privileges that made us successful. 

Of the manor born and proud.

Did you have more or less than the privileges that Zuckerberg had? 

[siru]

6 hours ago, ysshakeela said:

The Royal Family of England ruled 25% of the Earths' surface and 40% of the world population for over 200 years.

The USA population as you see it now mainly comprises of people of British Origin with Irish, Scottish and German flavours.

They built what you see today as USA.

Does you family have that kind of History? 

You people still wait for Visas at every WesternNation's Embassy in India. and anywhere in the World.

Thats the difference between beggars and rulers.

 

thokka em kadu..royal family did not have any powers back then also. Ipudu elaga name sake vunnaro ..300 years back kuda vallu anthe. UK has the oldest democracy and always PM was the powerful leader not the royals

[DummyVariable]

5 minutes ago, betapilli said:

Did you have more or less than the privileges that Zuckerberg had? 

Zuckerberg would not be considered poor without the money/Facebook.

[siru]

English Royalty held no power since 1600s lol

In the Kingdom of England, the Glorious Revolution of 1688 led to a constitutional monarchy restricted by laws such as the Bill of Rights 1689 and the Act of Settlement 1701, although limits on the power of the monarch ("a limited monarchy") are much older than that (see Magna Carta). At the same time, in Scotland, the Convention of Estates enacted the Claim of Right Act 1689, which placed similar limits on the Scottish monarchy.

Although Queen Anne was the last monarch to veto an Act of Parliament when, on 11 March 1708, she blocked the Scottish Militia Bill, Hanoverian monarchs continued to selectively dictate government policies. 

[betapilli]

2 minutes ago, DummyVariable said:

Zuckerberg would not be considered poor without the money/Facebook.

So would you and me, so would a lot of people. But there is only one Zuckerberg. So, would you say he is who he is because he is privileged? 

[betapilli]

4 minutes ago, DummyVariable said:

Zuckerberg would not be considered poor without the money/Facebook.

You and @tom bhayya disappoint me, I didn't know both of you had so much socialist inclination when I first started talking with you both. 

[quickgun_murugun]

9 hours ago, Spartan said:

mental torture valla palace dati vachindou...

mental health officer aa

Aa experience ikkada use chestadu 

[DummyVariable]

3 minutes ago, betapilli said:

You and @tom bhayya disappoint me, I didn't know both of you had so much socialist inclination when I first started talking with you both. 

You do know that a majority of the left denies that they are privileged... 

[betapilli]

Just now, DummyVariable said:

You do know that a majority of the left denies that they are privileged... 

I am not saying privileged people don't have a benefit. I am saying privilege alone doesn't make you Uber rich, or doesn't stop you from being poor. 

[tom bhayya]

11 hours ago, ysshakeela said:

Did they take away Dhavaleswaram barrage as well?

Roads railways  barrages kattindhi generate more income and transport back to their country koncham vaadu social service cheyadaaniki vachaaru antunnava? 

[Raven_Rayes]

On 3/24/2021 at 9:29 AM, betapilli said:

I am not saying privileged people don't have a benefit. I am saying privilege alone doesn't make you Uber rich, or doesn't stop you from being poor. 

people live in bubbles, outside of which they are utterly useless. economic/social privilege is one such bubble. 

even I tried to work as construction labourer for a few months.. broke my brain. I'm utterly incapable of interacting with anyone outside my relatives and friends now, without having a migraine.

yes, you are broadly right though. Unless someone is hailing Harry taking up a job as something more than some mundane news, there's no need to pile on that poor guy.

[Raven_Rayes]

On 3/24/2021 at 9:29 AM, betapilli said:

I am not saying privileged people don't have a benefit. I am saying privilege alone doesn't make you Uber rich, or doesn't stop you from being poor. 

Privilege is a loaded term. if you are uppercaste, and go against that ecosystem, you will be cut off from all the privilege of being born into it. There are norms and social customs that one must follow to continue to receive privilege and easy life. eg. sudha bhardwaj jailed for almost 3yrs now under made up charges for speaking for adivasi rights.

So yes, prince Harry working any job (even flipping burgers) is absolutely a huge chore for him. That he is willing to do it is appreciable.  

That he cut himself from the toxic english royalty is note worthy. kudos to him.

[Raven_Rayes]

On 3/24/2021 at 9:20 AM, betapilli said:

You and @tom bhayya disappoint me, I didn't know both of you had so much socialist inclination when I first started talking with you both. 

why don't you stick to your research? especially when your understanding of the world outside it seems to be so poor.

calling tombhayya or dummy a socialist is just insane. the right word is probably petty bourgeois

[DummyVariable]

On 3/23/2021 at 11:59 PM, betapilli said:

I am not saying privileged people don't have a benefit. I am saying privilege alone doesn't make you Uber rich, or doesn't stop you from being poor. 

But you still cannot cross out all glory days of your privilege just because it is convenient later on.

[Raven_Rayes]

5 minutes ago, DummyVariable said:

But you still cannot cross out all glory days of your privilege just because it is convenient later on.

Harry working any job is a huge step up from being royalty. It doesn't have to be flipping burgers. Him being CEO means that he still has to fight against all his instincts as royalty to work for the company. It is a struggle.

It doesn't have to be glorified. But it also doesn't deserve mockery (aside from the fact that almost all startups are just con jobs), unless Harry gives this all up and goes back to being royalty. He'd be breaking a number of people's trust and effort into initiate him into a job.