Jump to content

Modi ‘Super Spreader’ Of Covid-19: Indian Medical Association


Anta Assamey

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Iriswest said:

all india

Why? 
 

If a state is able to take care of its subjects why should that state go under President’s rule? Crisis is state-wise and certain states are able to handle the situation better than others. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, futureofandhra said:

useless opposition

 

Opposition untene pani chestara. And is the opposition only qualified to criticize the government.

media emi chesthundi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, dewarist said:

Opposition untene pani chestara. And is the opposition only qualified to criticize the government.

media emi chesthundi.

PM is from opposition.

he calls all shots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ellen said:

Cooperative federalism

This is the only reason I supported that asshole in 2014.

his stance on GST, Aadhar etc were rational, and I got carried away and even said a few nasty things about muslims just toi support this asshole. A stain I can never wash off myself.

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Raven_Rayes said:

This is the only reason I supported that asshole in 2014.

his stance on GST, Aadhar etc were rational, and I got carried away and even said a few nasty things about muslims just toi support this asshole. A stain I can never wash off myself.

Likewise. But I never got carried away with religious stuff though. 

But having everything in same color will never work in a country like India. It is opposite to what they promised.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bhaigan said:

This is the reason UPA 1 in damn successful, In UPA 2 union govt became too too weak hence death blow for congress in 2014

Union govt. should neither be too strong nor too weak also

was UPA 2 really weak? I don't think so. They were arrogant and tried to create a supranational state via GST Aadhar. UPA 2 was more arrogant than UPA 1, because they won more seats the second time.

UPA created most of the policies that NDA is exploiting to the hilt today. NDA is doing it with a charismatic (I feel yucky to say this, but he's really loved by the masses, I wont understand why) leader at the top.When UPA pushed for the same policies, states simply dismissed them, while they couldn't do so with NDA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Ellen said:

Likewise. But I never got carried away with religious stuff though. 

But having everything in same color will never work in a country like India. It is opposite to what they promised.

you are a much better person than I am, obviously.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dewarist said:

Summarizes the attitude of BJP, sacche janalu ela aina chastaru, power mukhyam.

opposition lo pappu gadu unantha varaku NDA gelustune untundi..no other option for people

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dewarist said:

_-_ ala cheppukoni neettuku ravadame. Chesindi maatram emi ledu.

janalaki inko option ledu antunna. Inko better option unte vote for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, bhaigan said:

This is a lesson who to vote and who not vote in elections in India

Gujarat development model is utter failure ani deeni batti ardam ayipoyindi

I neither support some congress leaders too, vote for legit guys who does care about development, health, infrastructure and jobs also minimum basic needs

Gujarat model utter failure ani ela antav bro ? everything always have room for improvement.. health side fail ayyindi ani migithavi kuda fail ante ela ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Raven_Rayes said:

was UPA 2 really weak? I don't think so. They were arrogant and tried to create a supranational state via GST Aadhar. UPA 2 was more arrogant than UPA 1, because they won more seats the second time.

UPA created most of the policies that NDA is exploiting to the hilt today. NDA is doing it with a charismatic (I feel yucky to say this, but he's really loved by the masses, I wont understand why) leader at the top.When UPA pushed for the same policies, states simply dismissed them, while they couldn't do so with NDA.

corrected 

Thought congress succumbed to coalition partners pressure , yes you are right they were arrogant too 

But I still stand on my point union govt should neither be too strong nor too weak to

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...