vankarodu_1 Posted May 14, 2021 Report Share Posted May 14, 2021 Whoever, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards, the Government established by law in India, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, to which fine may be added, or with imprisonment which may extend to three years, to which fine may be added, or with fine. Explanation 1.—The expression “disaffection” includes disloyalty and all feelings of enmity. Explanation 2.—Comments expressing disapprobation of the measures of the Government with a view to obtain their alteration by lawful means, without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, contempt or disaffection, do not constitute an offence under this section. Explanation 3.—Comments expressing disapprobation of the administrative or other action of the Government without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, contempt or disaffection, do not constitute an offence under this section. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vankarodu_1 Posted May 14, 2021 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2021 Know what is section 124-A of IPC which Congress' manifesto promises to remove Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vankarodu_1 Posted May 14, 2021 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2021 never knew such section exist. ila aithe, no one should talk against an elected govt anamata. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birsa Posted May 14, 2021 Report Share Posted May 14, 2021 Repu judge suresh reddy, raju gariki bail isthe Hindu reddy Lekapothe @XtianTeddy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vankarodu_1 Posted May 14, 2021 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2021 A case in 1958, Ram Nandan v State, heard by the Allahabad High Court declared the sedition law void.[6] The Punjab high court had also struck down the law.[7] A Supreme Court judgement in 1962 brought back sedition into the Constitution, interpreting the section to say that it only applies if there is "incitement to violence".[8][2] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pitta Posted May 14, 2021 Report Share Posted May 14, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vankarodu_1 Posted May 14, 2021 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2021 In post-independence India, Section 124A came under criticism at numerous intervals, being singled out for its curbing of free speech. When the First Amendment of the Constitution of India was passed in 1951, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru proposed to "get rid of it [Section 124A]" as written, and favoured handling sedition-related by other means Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Somedude Posted May 14, 2021 Report Share Posted May 14, 2021 1 minute ago, vankarodu_1 said: Whoever, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards, the Government established by law in India, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, to which fine may be added, or with imprisonment which may extend to three years, to which fine may be added, or with fine. Explanation 1.—The expression “disaffection” includes disloyalty and all feelings of enmity. Explanation 2.—Comments expressing disapprobation of the measures of the Government with a view to obtain their alteration by lawful means, without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, contempt or disaffection, do not constitute an offence under this section. Explanation 3.—Comments expressing disapprobation of the administrative or other action of the Government without exciting or attempting to excite hatred, contempt or disaffection, do not constitute an offence under this section. Dheeni ki against ga dissent express chesthe protect cheyyadaniki chala sections ne unnayi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vankarodu_1 Posted May 14, 2021 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2021 pichi puvvu reddy gadu ilantivi eskochi manchi pani chesadu ippdu andhari mundhu malli erri pku avathaniki ready ayyadu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apple Posted May 14, 2021 Report Share Posted May 14, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DummyVariable Posted May 14, 2021 Report Share Posted May 14, 2021 Ee section why will anyone remove? Umar Khalid and Kanhaya Kumar ni deeni kindanega lopala vesindhi? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuvvu_naakina_paalem Posted May 14, 2021 Report Share Posted May 14, 2021 7 minutes ago, vankarodu_1 said: In post-independence India, Section 124A came under criticism at numerous intervals, being singled out for its curbing of free speech. When the First Amendment of the Constitution of India was passed in 1951, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru proposed to "get rid of it [Section 124A]" as written, and favoured handling sedition-related by other means 2 minutes ago, DummyVariable said: Ee section why will anyone remove? Umar Khalid and Kanhaya Kumar ni deeni kindanega lopala vesindhi? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.gif.343fe49c7e1c507ae0056326bd8cf77e.gif)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.