Vakeel saab movie doubt

[Ellen]

4 minutes ago, AppatloBhutto said:

 

"Okay..okay....okay....okay....okay..okay....memu dabbulu teeskunnam"

"sir, memu dabbulu adigam, memu dabbulu DEMAND chesam. memu dabbulu teeskunnam."

"sir, memu dabbulu teeskunnamu. but, teeskunnaka pallavi manasu marchukundi. vaddu ani cheppindi" .

this is how she ADMITS. 

 

anduke cinema sarigga chudali anedi.

Matter ikada even if it is a prostitute if she is not comfortable with the sexual advances... u shud abstain from touching her ani. No means no ante ade kada. 

[AppatloBhutto]

1 minute ago, AppatloBhutto said:

 

"Okay..okay....okay....okay....okay..okay....memu dabbulu teeskunnam"

"sir, memu dabbulu adigam, memu dabbulu DEMAND chesam. memu dabbulu teeskunnam."

"sir, memu dabbulu teeskunnamu. but, teeskunnaka pallavi manasu marchukundi. vaddu ani cheppindi" .

this is how she ADMITS. 

 

anduke cinema sarigga chudali anedi.

when she says this, ananya CRIES and denies (cuz she isn't aware of that anjali and nivetha demanded for money).

but look at nivetha, she silently feels bad that the truth came out, unexpectedly.

both anjali and nivetha committed crime and yet there were let go free.

[AppatloBhutto]

Just now, Ellen said:

Matter ikada even if it is a prostitute if she is not comfortable with the sexual advances... u shud abstain from touching her ani. No means no ante ade kada. 

no body is denying that. so chill.

[MRI]

1 minute ago, AppatloBhutto said:

no body is denying that. so chill.

adi correct ee.. kaani basic ga memu illegal panulu chestaam.. paisal dongalinchi ishtam vachinattu maata maarustaam.. ayina vaati gurinchi maatram maatladam.. maa chuttuney bhoomi tiragaali antaaru.. 

[AppatloBhutto]

10 minutes ago, Amrita said:

Chudalsindi mari sarigga miku ardham ayyedi. 

artham kavalsindi tamarike...andke dialogue kuda raasanu, chusi artham cheskuntaru ani.

[Ellen]

3 minutes ago, MRI said:

adi correct ee.. kaani basic ga memu illegal panulu chestaam.. paisal dongalinchi ishtam vachinattu maata maarustaam.. ayina vaati gurinchi maatram maatladam.. maa chuttuney bhoomi tiragaali antaaru.. 

Wtf 

[Ellen]

7 minutes ago, AppatloBhutto said:

when she says this, ananya CRIES and denies (cuz she isn't aware of that anjali and nivetha demanded for money).

but look at nivetha, she silently feels bad that the truth came out, unexpectedly.

both anjali and nivetha committed crime and yet there were let go free.

Type chese opika leka pink meeda rasina post ettesi pasting here...may be this shud explain :

The explanation was given by Falak in the next scene itself but let me explain a bit about their position in the case due to the question raised by the Prosecution about the exchange of money. The main argument of the prosecution was that the girls had taken money and agreed to consensual sex but having disputed over the money then attacked the victim. And by consistently bringing up the matter of money the prosecution was trying to drift the court towards the point that the guys in this case were not the perpetrators but the victims.

 

"To start with there was no concrete evidence about the money changing hands and it was just one’s word against the other’s. By dragging it around the prosecution was trying to cast shadow on the girls’ character as well as their defense. The video footage unfortunately shows them in poor light and Falak knew that no matter what they say they had no evidence that they did not accept money. So by agreeing to the allegation, Falak forces them to move on to the point that even if they had reached an agreement on the matter of money, they withdrew consent and by law should have been absolved of their end of the bargain. At this point the people as an audience and the court are forced to address the fact that at any point, be it a man or a woman, whether of sound or questionable character, if they withdraw their consent then the act becomes sexual assault and is punishable by Law."

[Amrita]

2 minutes ago, AppatloBhutto said:

artham kavalsindi tamarike...andke dialogue kuda raasanu, chusi artham cheskuntaru ani.

I understood the movie . I can’t explain and write essays even on a movie . Let it be it . 

[AppatloBhutto]

8 minutes ago, AppatloBhutto said:

when she says this, ananya CRIES and denies (cuz she isn't aware of that anjali and nivetha demanded for money).

but look at nivetha, she silently feels bad that the truth came out, unexpectedly.

both anjali and nivetha committed crime and yet there were let go free.

OMG, look what i found in wiki (if only its an authenticated source). "As long as it is done individually and voluntarily, a woman (male prostitution is not recognised in any law in India) can use her body in exchange for material benefit.". 

 

law ala undi, so, i take back my words above. 

[AppatloBhutto]

3 minutes ago, Amrita said:

I understood the movie . I can’t explain and write essays even on a movie . Let it be it . 

" Yeah agreed . But basically vallu sluts ani anukunnaru anedi naku shocking ga undi . They are innocent women who were just in wrong place ani ardham kaley ante  "

this is what you said. anduke dialogue kuda rayalsi vachindi. 

 

[AppatloBhutto]

14 minutes ago, MRI said:

adi correct ee.. kaani basic ga memu illegal panulu chestaam.. paisal dongalinchi ishtam vachinattu maata maarustaam.. ayina vaati gurinchi maatram maatladam.. maa chuttuney bhoomi tiragaali antaaru.. 

😂

[Amrita]

10 minutes ago, AppatloBhutto said:

" Yeah agreed . But basically vallu sluts ani anukunnaru anedi naku shocking ga undi . They are innocent women who were just in wrong place ani ardham kaley ante  "

this is what you said. anduke dialogue kuda rayalsi vachindi. 

 

Even if they are into prostitution in this case they are innocent .  Prostitution Chesina they aren’t public property . They didn’t take money they were in wrong situation consent is needed. Irrelevant to this case valla character assassination is what is talked more in the court .Pink lo they established this clearly that they are innocent .  Even aFter she agree in court PK intiki velli she says  that scene lo they established she said it in frustration.  

Screen play perfect like pink ani anatle but gist ardham kale annanu. 

[MRI]

16 minutes ago, Ellen said:

So by agreeing to the allegation, Falak forces them to move on to the point that even if they had reached an agreement on the matter of money, they withdrew consent and by law should have been absolved of their end of the bargain. At this point the people as an audience and the court are forced to address the fact that at any point, be it a man or a woman, whether of sound or questionable character, if they withdraw their consent then the act becomes sexual assault and is punishable by Law."

ishtam vachindi raasesi law cheptundi antey comedy ga vuntundi.. which law says this.. quote the appropriate law..

They haven't reached an agreement on matter of money.. they agreed they accepted payment.. "dabbulu teesukunnam" if I remember the money correctly.. if they revoked consent, which means they are breaking an agreement, they have to prove that they returned the accepted payment..which did not happen.. chesindi chesi taravata convenience batti maata maaristey law vaalla vaipu ayipodu.. specifically in Telugu, there is no where proven that they withdrew consent before the act.. in Hindi, they did.

[AppatloBhutto]

3 minutes ago, Amrita said:

Even if they are into prostitution in this case they are innocent .  Prostitution Chesina they aren’t public property . They didn’t take money they were in wrong situation consent is needed. Irrelevant to this case valla character assassination is what is talked more in the court .Pink lo they established this clearly that they are innocent .  Even aFter she agree in court PK intiki velli she says  that scene lo they established she said it in frustration.  
 

they are innocent only cuz the Indian law does not refer to the practice of selling one's own sexual service as prostitution. (any any legal experts can correct me if i'm wrong) 

[Ellen]

Just now, Amrita said:

Even if they are into prostitution in this case they are innocent .  Prostitution Chesina they aren’t public property . They didn’t take money they were in wrong situation consent is needed. Irrelevant to this case valla character assassination is what is talked more in the court .Pink lo they established this clearly that they are innocent . 

Basic ga oka mindset toh oka 30+ years perginaka.. it is difficult to change people's mindset. The core issue of the movie ne ilanti mindset ni address cheyadam. Adi maaradu light. 

Ikada money teeskuna kani doesn't mean it is equal to consent. Money is just synonymous to many other things as well such as friendly behavior, dressing, being open etc. Ila enni unnai kani it would still be counted as molestation if a guy approaches to her sexually. 

"This point is important in all the subtexts as many cases are built against a woman to show background, previous sexual escapades, etc. These are irrelevant and should NOT be taken into account - including a sex worker - cannot be forced with sex!!

Falak does this in a moment of frustration when she realises the prosecution is trying to humiliate the girls by money money!! So in anger she says yes, We took money but later Minnal withdrew consent - that should still be molestation in the eyes of the law!"

U know...most of the people's curiosity about this matter  in itself explains the basis of this film
Taking or not taking money is not the question here and should not be a parameter in judging the women or judging the act of the men. But the above  thought is exactly what the filmmakers wanted to evoke in the viewer's mind. Ainaa kani we shall empathize with those molesters... So... Em cheyalem don't bother explaining light.