Great India sale

[Pulkapresident]

3 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

i guess...you are aware of corporate syndicats...in USA...specially with cabel and internet...

consumer..dont have right (indirectly) to choose the provider...its up to the corporate syndicate...

IMO...welfare (public partnership) and development (private partnership) should be in balance...like 50-50...not like entire ownership in someone hands...

just imagine...few decades back...like 70s 80s BSNL..if they were in private hands...do you think all the telephone poles/infrastructure are in place across the country...and wide network was available across the country...?

This is why, the work of the Government is to prevent collusion between firms to monopolize businesses. Having another business called BSNL will not solve the problem of internet and cable. The purpose of the Government is to regulate firms making money, not making money by itself. 

[huma]

4 hours ago, Everydayrunner said:

India needs capitalism

[Raven_Rayes]

33 minutes ago, TOM_BHAYYA said:

Yes, already most of the money is going towards R&R , going forward it is going to be more expensive. India lanti countries lo it is better to keep its land with gov.

Nee land edanna SEZ kosam, road kosam, airport kosam ichhaava govt ki? 

Nuvvu market rate ki koncham takkuva ichhintaav. Today that will be transferred to corporates. Lol

PulkaPresident is extremely dumb. 

[dasari4kntr]

7 minutes ago, Pulkapresident said:

This is why, the work of the Government is to prevent collusion between firms to monopolize businesses. Having another business called BSNL will not solve the problem of internet and cable. The purpose of the Government is to regulate firms making money, not making money by itself. 

its not just about making money....

its about welfare...

Corporates only provide services where the money comes...

so..there will be one section of people will be ingored...

just another example...in govt banks..any person can open account...but in private banks..you need to have certain opening balance..etc

it will be similar to LIC..etc also..

[Raven_Rayes]

6 minutes ago, Pulkapresident said:

This is why, the work of the Government is to prevent collusion between firms to monopolize businesses. Having another business called BSNL will not solve the problem of internet and cable. The purpose of the Government is to regulate firms making money, not making money by itself. 

If the govt has no power how will it prevent the collusion?

Will you even consider an argument that is made by someone who didn't go to IIT or worked in Stanford? Lol. Same corporates will either ask govt to off or ignore it.

[Raven_Rayes]

Just now, dasari4kntr said:

its not just about making money....

its about welfare...

Corporates only provide services where the money comes...

so..there will be one section of people will be ingored...

just another example...in govt banks..any person can open account...but in private banks..you need to have certain opening balance..etc

it will be similar to LIC..etc also..

You guys are feeding his sociopathy. Allowing him to make dumber and dumber statements so he can get off on it.

 

[Raven_Rayes]

56 minutes ago, Pulkapresident said:

Mana vallu enakesukodanki land okkate undi, a land anta private people ki ichi paradobbite better. The Government should not be able to run on any income other than taxes. Only then will development happen. 

Next time road kattaali ante, the acquisition cost of any infrastructure will zoom to 100times.

Why you think China built 30new metro systems in the last 20yrs, and US built zero?

[Raven_Rayes]

Anyway I'm ambivalent on this move, except my irrational love for indian railways which sheltered me for 6 months when i was on the roads.

I don't expect much good from this move, but i also don't expect too much bad from this.

However the other announcement that GoI made yesterday regarding easy approval for projects built inside protected forest zones is even more scary

[veerigadu]

Disastrous. Capitalism proliferation is never a good move for a third world country such as India. 

[veerigadu]

We have a huge population that still relies on government for everything. Weakening govt like this will be a disaster for their future 

[Raven_Rayes]

1 hour ago, Pulkapresident said:

Mana vallu enakesukodanki land okkate undi, a land anta private people ki ichi paradobbite better. The Government should not be able to run on any income other than taxes. Only then will development happen. 

Lol. Ask Kansas how that experiment went. 

Why did US run $24t debt then? Let me guess, it was all democrats. But then reality disagrees with you. Trump racked up trillion dollar budget deficits even before the pandemic, and when the economy was doing reasonably well. 

 

[Raven_Rayes]

1 minute ago, veerigadu said:

Disastrous. Capitalism proliferation is never a good move for a third world country such as India. 

Capitalism is not the problem. Farm laws are the example to prove that indian govt lacks the understanding of how efficient markets function, and have no long term vision other than short term profits for its cronies.

 

While world is capitalist. It is inescapable. What India needs is an enlightened understanding of govts role.

 

When guys who went to India's premier institutes like pillibeta carry archaic notions about govts role in the market, what hope do you have for the rest of India?

[Pulkapresident]

4 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

its not just about making money....

its about welfare...

Corporates only provide services where the money comes...

so..there will be one section of people will be ingored...

just another example...in govt banks..any person can open account...but in private banks..you need to have certain opening balance..etc

it will be similar to LIC..etc also..

Like I said the function of the Government is to ensure firms are working properly, not be a firm itself. 

[Raven_Rayes]

Govts role is to ensure markets function efficiently. 

Which no govt has achieved anywhere close to perfection in the world. Including the US. 

But most govts have done atleast the basics right. Created or helped create infrastructure (both physical, legal, and social) to make sure basic goods market is efficient. India's wildly fluctuating agri market is an example of failure of GoI over the decades. 

[Raven_Rayes]

1 minute ago, Pulkapresident said:

Like I said the function of the Government is to ensure firms are working properly, not be a firm itself. 

Okay. And then? There's something more.

Provide capital for those firms. That's also the function of govts. Run up huge deficits to provide capital to firms. Otherwise there's no economy. Only chattel slavery.

Ofcourse i can have a couple s3x slaves for cheap, if i get over my guilt inheriting a huge fortune