Jump to content

Do Countries need army???


NiranjanGaaru

Recommended Posts

After losing to rogue people like taliban, does US need army.??? 

Same with India, china occupied 60 sq km in recent times, but no fighting back

Then what was army for.....????? For doing military exercises on independence day and republic Day a???? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/31/2021 at 1:07 AM, NiranjanGaaru said:

After losing to rogue people like taliban, does US need army.??? 

Same with India, china occupied 60 sq km in recent times, but no fighting back

Then what was army for.....????? For doing military exercises on independence day and republic Day a???? 

we need army but with generals like George S Patton and Douglas MacArthur instead of attack chesthe political ga mana ruling party ki emavuddi jaffa peace activists and lefty CCP channels peelings emavthay anedi alochinchakunda I think war ki elle mundu alochinchali ee treaties and stuff but china lanti situation lo it's a matter defending the homeland not advancing into enemy lines kada so i guess PM must STFU and leave the matter to Generals to take care of

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/30/2021 at 12:37 PM, NiranjanGaaru said:

After losing to rogue people like taliban, does US need army.??? 

Same with India, china occupied 60 sq km in recent times, but no fighting back

Then what was army for.....????? For doing military exercises on independence day and republic Day a???? 

Back in the day, military is more powerful. Now, economy and diplomacy are more powerful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/30/2021 at 2:37 PM, NiranjanGaaru said:

After losing to rogue people like taliban, does US need army.??? 

Same with India, china occupied 60 sq km in recent times, but no fighting back

Then what was army for.....????? For doing military exercises on independence day and republic Day a???? 

whaat u see is not reality

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, NaMo_JaMo said:

we need army but with generals like George S Patton and Douglas MacArthur instead of attack chesthe political ga mana ruling party ki emavuddi jaffa peace activists and lefty CCP channels peelings emavthay anedi alochinchakunda I think war ki elle mundu alochinchali ee treaties and stuff but china lanti situation lo it's a matter defending the homeland not advancing into enemy lines kada so i guess PM must STFU and leave the matter to Generals to take care of

Yeah but modi did nothing...... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

employment guarantee program kosam, duh!

fight chestey enti use? mutual destruction guaranteed. 1940s lo nay antha mandhi chanipoyaaru.

ippudu fight chesthey, enti soldiers tho chestaru ani anukuntunnava. idemanna video game aa..

direct ga civilians meedhey esedhi bomb lu. mooskoni padundu. ekkuva oohinchaku.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, NaMo_JaMo said:

we need army but with generals like George S Patton and Douglas MacArthur instead of attack chesthe political ga mana ruling party ki emavuddi jaffa peace activists and lefty CCP channels peelings emavthay anedi alochinchakunda I think war ki elle mundu alochinchali ee treaties and stuff but china lanti situation lo it's a matter defending the homeland not advancing into enemy lines kada so i guess PM must STFU and leave the matter to Generals to take care of

homeland aa bochha. Indian economy baaguntey, China will think twice about trying to strongarm India.

army tho peekedhi em ledhu.

every year China is leaving India in the dust. Army kaadhu, China is going to outbid India in every deal, and leave India poorer. unless India picks up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Army exists only for intimidation. Not for fighting.

Two powerful nations (no joke, India is really powerful, but doesn't know how to leverage it) India and China can never engage in a war.

That China thins that it can start a confrontation with India shows how low of an opinion Chinese rulers holds on India. India can prove them wrong by backing off a little, and surprising them when India has the upper hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/31/2021 at 1:07 AM, NiranjanGaaru said:

After losing to rogue people like taliban, does US need army.??? 

Same with India, china occupied 60 sq km in recent times, but no fighting back

Then what was army for.....????? For doing military exercises on independence day and republic Day a???? 

US didn't lose to Taliban.. lol.

They achieved their objective with Taliban eppudo, even before killing Osama. and they are simply wasting money to maintain their infra there, making many military contractors rich. So Biden - the greatest US president of this century, decided to stop wasting that money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Raven_Rayes said:

US didn't lose to Taliban.. lol.

They achieved their objective with Taliban eppudo, even before killing Osama. and they are simply wasting money to maintain their infra there, making many military contractors rich. So Biden - the greatest US president of this century, decided to stop wasting that money.

Lol , then why they did made a deal with taliban

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NiranjanGaaru said:

Lol , then why they did made a deal with taliban

Because they realised its a waste of their time fighting them. They were just trying to protect the 'democratic' govt they installed there.

Taliban emi peekuthundi US army ni? dreams lo unnava. But Taliban has the power to disrupt reconstruction of Afghan. So deal chesaru.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...