did you ever face racism in US vaa?

[jiggubhai]

Just now, Pulkapresident said:

Xenophobia ante meaning erukana

 

1 minute ago, jiggubhai said:

by saying there are too many indians in an area, he is implying he thinks it's not ok to have that number of indians in that area, which is the definition of prejudice.

And prejudice against a certain race is the definition of xenophobia. 

 

[Pulkapresident]

Just now, jiggubhai said:

by saying there are too many indians in an area, he is implying he thinks it's not ok to have that number of indians in that area, which is the definition of prejudice.

And prejudice against a certain race is the definition of xenophobia. 

What the fcuk are you talking ra? What did he say that made it seem like he hates Indians

[tennisluvrredux]

4 minutes ago, jiggubhai said:

by saying there are too many indians in an area, he is implying he thinks it's not ok to have that number of indians in that area, which is the definition of prejudice.

And prejudice against a certain race is the definition of xenophobia. 

Bokkem kaadu, gadida guddu logic la undi vayya. 

By saying there are too many Indians in an area, he's actually saying the truth. Compared to most places in the Bay Area, Fremont has a higher concentration of Indians so it's his observation which is 100% true. He never implied anything, it's you that are implying that he "might" have meant that it's not okay with him having so many Indians in Fremont.  

So no where did he project any kind of xenophobia, neeku ride ivvanu nuvvu desi gadivi ani dobbeyamante then you could have claimed Xenophobia. Btw, Indians in the US are on average multiple times more racist in the same vein towards other races esp African Americans, Hispanics etc. So mana G manam kadukkodam better. Look at that asswipe @jambalhaatrajas posts here, that gives you a good clue. Of course, most desis I know in person aren't even close to the gutter dweller he is when it comes to some of his statements anuko. 

[Pulkapresident]

1 minute ago, tennisluvrredux said:

Bokkem kaadu, gadida guddu logic la undi vayya. 

By saying there are too many Indians in an area, he's actually saying the truth. Compared to most places in the Bay Area, Fremont has a higher concentration of Indians so it's his observation which is 100% true. He never implied anything, it's you that are implying that he "might" have meant that it's not okay with him having so many Indians in Fremont.  

So no where did he project any kind of xenophobia, neeku ride ivvanu nuvvu desi gadivi ani dobbeyamante then you could have claimed Xenophobia. Btw, Indians in the US are on average multiple times more racist in the same vein towards other races esp African Americans, Hispanics etc. So mana G manam kadukkodam better. Look at that asswipe @jambalhaatrajas posts here, that gives you a good clue. Of course, most desis I know in person aren't even close to the gutter dweller he is when it comes to some of his statements anuko. 

To be honest, even if he meant to say that there are too many Indians taking jobs of white men, I don't think that's being racist since there is a lot of truth to it. 

[Epic]

16 minutes ago, jiggubhai said:

too many indians

Folks here use “too many” for negative statements, “a lot of” would have been appropriate in this context. I agree with ts’s view here.

[tennisluvrredux]

3 minutes ago, Epic said:

Folks here use “too many” for negative statements, “a lot of” would have been appropriate in this context. I agree with ts’s view here.

Andaru grammar lo experts undaka povachu le vo, thanu racist uddesam tho annado ledo manakem telusu "too many" padam use chesinanduku

[Epic]

3 minutes ago, tennisluvrredux said:

Andaru grammar lo experts undaka povachu le vo, thanu racist uddesam tho annado ledo manakem telusu "too many" padam use chesinanduku

Valla vaaduka bhasha kabatti they know what they are talking - we need to understand the thin lining and be careful.

“Ikkada chaala mandi unnaru” vs “ikkada ekkada padithe akkada unnaru”  ki theda undhi

[jiggubhai]

14 minutes ago, tennisluvrredux said:

Bokkem kaadu, gadida guddu logic la undi vayya. 

By saying there are too many Indians in an area, he's actually saying the truth. Compared to most places in the Bay Area, Fremont has a higher concentration of Indians so it's his observation which is 100% true. He never implied anything, it's you that are implying that he "might" have meant it. 

So no where did he project any kind of xenophobia, neeku ride ivvanu nuvvu desi gadivi ani dobbeyamante then you could have claimed Xenophobia. Btw, Indians in the US are on average multiple times more racist in the same vein towards other races esp African Americans, Hispanics etc. So mana G manam kadukkodam better. 

I think my logic is sound vaa.. I agree that there is a higher concentration of Indians in Fremont. But why is a certain number of Indians too many is the real kochen here. When someone says "too many of something", it means they think there should be a smaller number of that thing, and when someone says that about a race of people that's definitely messed up. Imagine tella people here saying the number of blacks in the US is too many. Would you still say it's an acceptable statement to make?

[jiggubhai]

11 minutes ago, Epic said:

Folks here use “too many” for negative statements, “a lot of” would have been appropriate in this context. I agree with ts’s view here.

@tennisluvrredux This is exactly what I mean. "Too many" is used in a negative way here. "many" or "a lot of" is the right thing to use if his intention was to just say there are a lot of Indians (which I don't think was his intention because he specifically said "too many").

[ShruteSastry]

17 minutes ago, jiggubhai said:

by saying there are too many indians in an area, he is implying he thinks it's not ok to have that number of indians in that area, which is the definition of prejudice.

And prejudice against a certain race is the definition of xenophobia. 

Bruh, you are assuming what he meant by his words. 

That's never right.

Only hear and react, Assumptions ki velthe, you will think everyone in the world are hating you.

[tennisluvrredux]

8 minutes ago, jiggubhai said:

@tennisluvrredux This is exactly what I mean. "Too many" is used in a negative way here. "many" or "a lot of" is the right thing to use if his intention was to just say there are a lot of Indians (which I don't think was his intention because he specifically said "too many").

I think it depends on the context, and you can usually judge if someone's saying that just as a compliment or being sarcastic/satirical about this. 

Since I am not there when this incident happened, I would leave it upto you bro. Nuvvela anukunte alane 

[yemdoing]

 

-------------------

Me: I heard you purchased new home.

 colleague 1: yeah , too many indians in XXX , moving to different location.

----------

Client: Why are there so many indians in IT field.

Me: still a insignificant number compared against total indian population

-----------------

Me:  I would like to order XXXX

Mexican restaurant Server: ok sure, we will curry it up for you !

 

-------------------------

Colleague got a scam call , he started bashing him how too many people are scamming Americans from india . He not so subtly insulted all indians.

------------------

everytime I heat some food in office microwave so tella guy will comment like how much they love curries. 

-------------------------

and many more .............

[jiggubhai]

12 minutes ago, ShruteSastry said:

Bruh, you are assuming what he meant by his words. 

That's never right.

Only hear and react, Assumptions ki velthe, you will think everyone in the world are hating you.

bro alaithe we can never judge the meaning of something. Imagine some tella dude said "indians are worthless". Should I not assume what he means by his words?

[jiggubhai]

4 minutes ago, yemdoing said:

 

-------------------

Me: I heard you purchased new home.

 colleague 1: yeah , too many indians in XXX , moving to different location.

----------

Client: Why are there so many indians in IT field.

Me: still a insignificant number compared against total indian population

-----------------

Me:  I would like to order XXXX

Mexican restaurant Server: ok sure, we will curry it up for you !

 

-------------------------

Colleague got a scam call , he started bashing him how too many people are scamming Americans from india . He not so subtly insulted all indians.

------------------

everytime I heat some food in office microwave so tella guy will comment like how much they love curries. 

-------------------------

and many more .............

10gei mani seppu vaa to those fooks

[jambalhaatraja]

32 minutes ago, tennisluvrredux said:

Bokkem kaadu, gadida guddu logic la undi vayya. 

By saying there are too many Indians in an area, he's actually saying the truth. Compared to most places in the Bay Area, Fremont has a higher concentration of Indians so it's his observation which is 100% true. He never implied anything, it's you that are implying that he "might" have meant that it's not okay with him having so many Indians in Fremont.  

So no where did he project any kind of xenophobia, neeku ride ivvanu nuvvu desi gadivi ani dobbeyamante then you could have claimed Xenophobia. Btw, Indians in the US are on average multiple times more racist in the same vein towards other races esp African Americans, Hispanics etc. So mana G manam kadukkodam better. Look at that asswipe @jambalhaatrajas posts here, that gives you a good clue. Of course, most desis I know in person aren't even close to the gutter dweller he is when it comes to some of his statements anuko. 

khi khi ... mast comedy angle undira neelo...BB lo lobo lekka..but only used as tissue paper to clean bum..nuvvu ante