Jump to content

Assam police under BJP Himant Biswas Sarma use machine guns on encourachers and photographer jumps on a dead/injured man


Telugodura456

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

why were assamese not raging maniacs during british rule. i find no instances of genocides of assamese against bengalis in theri 150 year rule of both provinces. 

Those detention centers are managed by GoI.

British governed it under the bengal presidency and then spun it off as north eastern frontier as a separate administrative region, which comprised of naga hills, mizoram etc.

it was a large and diverse territory, including even bangladeshi sylhet. It was again partitioned into eastern and western bengal, and Assam was under western bengal then.

the idea of assam as an ethnic group comes from the ahom kingdom. but modern assam, and even large parts of british assam were not part of the ahom kingdom. large part of what is Assam today was ceded by burmese after the anglo burmese war. The entire portion west of kamrup district was part of cooch behar kingdom whose capital was in Bengal. So bengalis were always living in that region. so to claim that assamese have natural right to these areas is just silly.

now there is some merit to assamese nationalist claims that bengal was imposed on assamese speakers during the regions reign under colonial bengal under the british. and that Assamese need their own identity.

also Assamese and Bengali are almost the same language, and they can understand each other well. It was the british that enforced an official language 'bengal' on Assamese territory after them having tasted partial independence as a separate province for a couple of decades in late 1800s. .

xenophobic displays of assamese nationalism started when the area was under british governance itself in the 1930s. British civil servant cs mullen in a report talks about how 'hordes of muslim immigrants invading and changing the assamese culture'. So your idea that it was India that fueled this, is just plain wrong.

the Assamese were not even majority speakers in the region that were claimed for assam during linguistic division of india states, and assamese ran campaigns in the 50s trying to convince bengalis in goalpara district (which was at the time the largest district in assam and bengali majority) to identify themselves as assamese so areas can come under Assamese control.

so for assamese to simply claim all that land is theirs is just unacceptable.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

Assam detention centers are sanctioned and run by Union home ministy. But blame must go to assam "nationalists"

https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/9/17/20861427/india-assam-citizenship-muslim-detention-camps

dude, dont keep on making extraneous points to this discussion to simply drive home an agenda. grow up.

assamese nationalists in fact demand detention camps to be built or the bengalis be settled elsewhere. since settling them elsewhere is impossible, the detention centers were built.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

Assam detention centers are sanctioned and run by Union home ministy. But blame must go to assam "nationalists"

https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/9/17/20861427/india-assam-citizenship-muslim-detention-camps

learn to accept that you are wrong. its just the internet. and yes, try and not support ethnonationalism.

and atleast read your own history, if not assamese.

your 'debates' with telangana posters were so painful, and bereft of any facts or any decent point, apart from reeking of entitlement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Raven_Rayes said:

British governed it under the bengal presidency and then spun it off as north eastern frontier as a separate administrative region, which comprised of naga hills, mizoram etc.

it was a large and diverse territory, including even bangladeshi sylhet. It was again partitioned into eastern and western bengal, and Assam was under western bengal then.

the idea of assam as an ethnic group comes from the ahom kingdom. but modern assam, and even large parts of british assam were not part of the ahom kingdom. large part of what is Assam today was ceded by burmese after the anglo burmese war. The entire portion west of kamrup district was part of cooch behar kingdom whose capital was in Bengal. So bengalis were always living in that region. so to claim that assamese have natural right to these areas is just silly.

now there is some merit to assamese nationalist claims that bengal was imposed on assamese speakers during the regions reign under colonial bengal under the british. and that Assamese need their own identity.

also Assamese and Bengali are almost the same language, and they can understand each other well. It was the british that enforced an official language 'bengal' on Assamese territory after them having tasted partial independence as a separate province for a couple of decades in late 1800s. .

xenophobic displays of assamese nationalism started when the area was under british governance itself in the 1930s. British civil servant cs mullen in a report talks about how 'hordes of muslim immigrants invading and changing the assamese culture'. So your idea that it was India that fueled this, is just plain wrong.

the Assamese were not even majority speakers in the region that were claimed for assam during linguistic division of india states, and assamese ran campaigns in the 50s trying to convince bengalis in goalpara district (which was at the time the largest district in assam and bengali majority) to identify themselves as assamese so areas can come under Assamese control.

so for assamese to simply claim all that land is theirs is just unacceptable.

 

I asked about evidence of "genocide" of assamese against bengalis during british era what you gave me is a statement of a british civil servant. why do you act like such a weasel ?  Also the statement seems to imply British tried to fuel to and were unsuccessful. How come india facilitated genocides so well ?

Answer this thing first - Did India facilitate peace there or enabled genocides ? evidence indicates it failed to manage peace.

Have you ever considered the possibility assamese and bengalis left to themselves will work out something amicable?. Assamese are not even 2 crore whereas bengalis are 25 crores. you really think 2 crore peope will commit genocides against 25 crore neighbours without fear of retailation ? it is india which facilitates these genocides and even such possibilities.

Assamese and Bengalis are quiet well capable of sorting out their difference. you and your indian govt can fck off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Raven_Rayes said:

learn to accept that you are wrong. its just the internet. and yes, try and not support ethnonationalism.

and atleast read your own history, if not assamese.

your 'debates' with telangana posters were so painful, and bereft of any facts or any decent point, apart from reeking of entitlement.

fck you hateful scum. . Are you trying a dog whistle with telangana guys now like your tried with "krishna lanka" batch? thoo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Raven_Rayes said:

dude, dont keep on making extraneous points to this discussion to simply drive home an agenda. grow up.

assamese nationalists in fact demand detention camps to be built or the bengalis be settled elsewhere. since settling them elsewhere is impossible, the detention centers were built.

 

Oh I see - poor union govt. Its such a nice thing - you see these locals force them to do such horrible things - if not for these savages indian govt would be such a nice gentle thing no?

Why indian govt built detention centers in Delhi - fcking four of them? one exclusively for bangladeshis? you lying scum.,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Telugodura456 said:

I asked about evidence of "genocide" of assamese against bengalis during british era what you gave me is a statement of a british civil servant. why do you act like such a weasel ?  Also the statement seems to imply British tried to fuel to and were unsuccessful. How come india facilitated genocides so well ?

Answer this thing first - Did India facilitate peace there or enabled genocides ? evidence indicates it failed to manage peace.

Have you ever considered the possibility assamese and bengalis left to themselves will work out something amicable?. Assamese are not even 2 crore whereas bengalis are 25 crores. you really think 2 crore peope will commit genocides against 25 crore neighbours without fear of retailation ? it is india which facilitates these genocides and even such possibilities.

Assamese and Bengalis are quiet well capable of sorting out their difference. you and your indian govt can fck off.

Lol. You have zero capacity to actually argue, other than demand that I make my case to you, while you keep repeating your own little wisdom about how India is the root cause of evil in the region. 

Assamese have already committed genocide on Bengalis idiot, why should I consider the possibility of them working out their differences when they've shown that they can't without external pressure.

Bengali politicians, including mamata hasn't spoken out against these atrocities on Bengalis inside of india and outside of Bengal. Why you think fuckface? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Telugodura456 said:

Oh I see - poor union govt. Its such a nice thing - you see these locals force them to do such horrible things - if not for these savages indian govt would be such a nice gentle thing no?

Why indian govt built detention centers in Delhi - fcking four of them? one exclusively for bangladeshis? you lying scum.,

Yeah the locals committed multiple genocides dude. How thick are you? Lol 

You obviously support indigenous people killing whoever they consider outsiders. Even if their claim to the land is just bs. Just admit it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Telugodura456 said:

fck you hateful scum. . Are you trying a dog whistle with telangana guys now like your tried with "krishna lanka" batch? thoo

Like I said, no one is reading this sh1t exchange. Get off your high horse. You are an unimportant useless moron in a db that's worth even less 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Raven_Rayes said:

Lol. You have zero capacity to actually argue, other than demand that I make my case to you, while you keep repeating your own little wisdom about how India is the root cause of evil in the region. 

Assamese have already committed genocide on Bengalis idiot, why should I consider the possibility of them working out their differences when they've shown that they can't without external pressure.

Bengali politicians, including mamata hasn't spoken out against these atrocities on Bengalis inside of india and outside of Bengal. Why you think fuckface? 

 

why arent 2 crore assamese not fearing 25 crore bengalis before committing "genocides" - whats givving assamese idea that they can genocide bengalis when they are so tiny infront of them ? thats the question ra dumbo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Raven_Rayes said:

Yeah the locals committed multiple genocides dude. How thick are you? Lol 

You obviously support indigenous people killing whoever they consider outsiders. Even if their claim to the land is just bs. Just admit it.

 

Detention centers are run by union in delhi also. you made the bluff they are run in assam becausse of assamese "nationlists" despite the fact they are run by home ministry. WHAT IS YOUR EXPLANATION FOR RUNNING THEM IN DELHI  - you hateful scumbag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 crore bengalis are divided in to two thanks to india/pakistan nonsense. Now the bengalis are so weak that they cannot prevent assamese from committing genocide. Neither can indian govt prevent them. whats the cause of this? this is the idea of india and its alternate pakistan. thats what creates this suffering/these murders/ these genocides/ this unending poverty/ this caste system which wont end even after 70 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Telugodura456 said:

why arent 2 crore assamese not fearing 25 crore bengalis before committing "genocides" - whats givving assamese idea that they can genocide bengalis when they are so tiny infront of them ? thats the question ra dumbo

Keep arguing hypotheticals fuckface.

You don't know history. You don't know that Assamese don't have right to the land they claim. You just want to blindly support some ethnic claim. 

That's why you are ethnonationalist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

Detention centers are run by union in delhi also. you made the bluff they are run in assam becausse of assamese "nationlists" despite the fact they are run by home ministry. WHAT IS YOUR EXPLANATION FOR RUNNING THEM IN DELHI  - you hateful scumbag.

Detention centers willbe run in Bangalore also in future. Even DMK govt is rounding up 'illegal bangladeshis' in TN to send them to detention centers. So what does it have to do with the murderous Assamese nationalist ideology?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...