Jump to content

Sekhar Kammula pacha media valla pulkaga marada?


Pulkapresident

Recommended Posts

Pilli brought up extremely rich neighbourhoods like Menlo Park, Palo Alto as if they are the norm.

most small sized cities like that can't sustain themselves, unless they have a university. and even with that, without increasing housing supply, the city is going nowhere. and living there is only exciting only for people who don't want to socialize.

no idea why you think why it matters where innovators come from. most people try to live as close to work as possible. unless they have other constraints like school neighbourhoods or something like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Raven_Rayes said:

Pilli brought up extremely rich neighbourhoods like Menlo Park, Palo Alto as if they are the norm.

most small sized cities like that can't sustain themselves, unless they have a university. and even with that, without increasing housing supply, the city is going nowhere. and living there is only exciting only for people who don't want to socialize.

no idea why you think why it matters where innovators come from. most people try to live as close to work as possible. unless they have other constraints like school neighbourhoods or something like that.

People want to live in large houses with big yards. it is foolish to argue against that. Only arguments are economics. In america it makes economic sense OR america is wealthy enough to pay the cost for what it wants - large suburbs with spread out housing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

I am talking about primary/middle/high schools. Do you know from where these unicorn start up founders grow and study ?

how does it matter? you make no sense.

I'm talking about unsustainability of small sized cities, and you are talking about how they supply innovators. lol.

so why doesn't this 'innovator' open a huge office in his hometown? because of his fcuking scum neighbours. they won't appreciate it.

so he moves to the city to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Raven_Rayes said:

how does it matter? you make no sense.

I'm talking about unsustainability of small sized cities, and you are talking about how they supply innovators. lol.

so why doesn't this 'innovator' open a huge office in his hometown? because of his fcuking scum neighbours. they won't appreciate it.

so he moves to the city to do it.

why isnt the city nurturing top talent if it is so great- most of the schools in cities are in shambles.  Paying for suburbs which raise productive kids is the social contract in america. ika chaalle - pakkaku thappuko.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Telugodura456 said:

People want to live in large houses with big yards. it is foolish to argue against that. Only arguments are economics. In america it makes economic sense OR america is wealthy enough to pay the cost for what it wants - large suburbs with spread out housing.

Apparently there is a new trend is against suburbs. America is spending more and more gentrifying its cities, improving housing supply.

recently berkeley passed law that doesn't mandate parking space for any new buildings. means builders won't build car parking spaces unless there's demand. And the demand for that is dwindling inside the cities.

LA is also considering such resolutions. Most people dont want to live in large houses, because most people are not making a lot of money. the few people that are, are speaking for the majority.

public push towards high density housing is unavoidable. All those people who want to live with big yards can be forced to pay more property taxes, if the federal govt just decides to stop subsidizing their cities.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankly kondaru ycp batch cbn chesindi em support chesina pacha antaru.

My friend okadu Anil brother meetings ki velley vaadu. Around 2013/2014.

Akkada nundi vachaka room lo dabidi dibidey.....

The amount of propaganda and filth about tdp or anything remotely related to tdp is immense.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Raven_Rayes said:

Apparently there is a new trend is against suburbs. America is spending more and more gentrifying its cities, improving housing supply.

recently berkeley passed law that doesn't mandate parking space for any new buildings. means builders won't build car parking spaces unless there's demand. And the demand for that is dwindling inside the cities.

LA is also considering such resolutions. Most people dont want to live in large houses, because most people are not making a lot of money. the few people that are, are speaking for the majority.

public push towards high density housing is unavoidable. All those people who want to live with big yards can be forced to pay more property taxes, if the federal govt just decides to stop subsidizing their cities.

 

 

berkely passing one law is greater impact than a million brand new suburban houses being sold EVERY month in america ?

Fed wont stop subidizing.  No one is saying suburban living is  not expensive. It just that Americans want it and are wealthy enough to pay for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

why isnt the city nurturing top talent if it is so great- most of the schools in cities are in shambles.  Paying for suburbs which raise productive kids is the social contract in america. ika chaalle - pakkaku thappuko.

haha.. you are in love with middle class.

zuckerberg was raised in NYC. admittedly in one of its suburbs. but that suburb is not a Atherton type suburb where ghosts live. but one with multistoreyed buildings all around. dense neighbourhood.

most productive kids do come from such neighbourhoods. Not from home with a huge pool and a large lawn.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

berkely passing one law is greater impact than a million brand new suburban houses being sold EVERY month in america ?

Fed wont stop subidizing.  No one is saying suburban living is  not expensive. It just that Americans want it and are wealthy enough to pay for it.

dude, try to make some sense. housing in cities are in obviously much higher demand than in suburbs.

people move to suburbs because they can't afford cities.

you want me to call those who move to suburbs as productive or innovators. lol.

if they were making above average salaries, they wouldn't have to make that move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

berkely passing one law is greater impact than a million brand new suburban houses being sold EVERY month in america ?

Fed wont stop subidizing.  No one is saying suburban living is  not expensive. It just that Americans want it and are wealthy enough to pay for it.

name one innovator who was born in Atherton.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Raven_Rayes said:

haha.. you are in love with middle class.

zuckerberg was raised in NYC. admittedly in one of its suburbs. but that suburb is not a Atherton type suburb where ghosts live. but one with multistoreyed buildings all around. dense neighbourhood.

most productive kids do come from such neighbourhoods. Not from home with a huge pool and a large lawn.

 

 

 

 

stop talking from your ass. He grew up in dogs ferry . It is far lower density than atherton. I have never seen a person more ignorant than you but acts so cocky. Even the denser houses below are nearer to river. Look at google maps. Its far lesser dense.

Dobbs%20Ferry%20New%20York.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

stop talking from your ass. He grew up in dogs ferry . It is far lower density than atherton. I have never seen a person more ignorant than you but acts so cocky. Even the denser houses below are nearer to river. Look at google maps. Its far lesser dense.

Dobbs%20Ferry%20New%20York.png

okay. I just went by what wiki said. obviously I jumped the gun there.

but still my point stands. Zuckerberg needed to move to where the action is - Palo Alto. And today its not Palo Alto, but San Francisco where the action has moved to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...