Jump to content

Mughals were refugees


JustChill_Mama

Recommended Posts

  • JustChill_Mama changed the title to Mughals were refugees
Just now, Ryzen_renoir said:

British Empire were just traders 

 

Yes. Valla vallane mana telugus ki English nerchukoni amrika lo jobs chesthunnaru (offcouse half of the credit goes to leader too). Lekunte Chinese people elago manalni thokkesevallu IT lo 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AWS said:

Whats the difference between Mughals and British?

Both are good people. They developed our country. Before independence 1 rupee = 1 $. 
BJP: all because of Nehru 

congi & other seculars: all because of upper caste 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JustChill_Mama said:

Yes. Valla vallane mana telugus ki English nerchukoni amrika lo jobs chesthunnaru (offcouse half of the credit goes to leader too). Lekunte Chinese people elago manalni thokkesevallu IT lo 

Vallu english neepinchindi mana meeda prematho kaadu valla gumastagiri koosam

ICS (indian civil service) lantidi petti daaniki eligibility kooda below 20 years chesaaru

do you think any indian in those days can learn english in below 20 years age? Only brother of ravindranath tagor got that admission

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JustChill_Mama said:

Both are good people. They developed our country. Before independence 1 rupee = 1 $. 
BJP: all because of Nehru 

congi & other seculars: all because of upper caste 

Hahaa 

good evaru kaadu

mughals came here and settled, what ever good or bad they did to india they did it as citizens of india

british came here to steal, they never treat them as indians eventjough some one born in india during that time. They treat india only exporter of raw material like they export cotton from india to london on low price and they make cloths and import to india with high prices

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, AWS said:

Vallu english neepinchindi mana meeda prematho kaadu valla gumastagiri koosam

ICS (indian civil service) lantidi petti daaniki eligibility kooda below 20 years chesaaru

do you think any indian in those days can learn english in below 20 years age? Only brother of ravindranath tagor got that admission

Nee bondha, chadivithe proper gaa History chaduvu boss, leekapoothe leedhu.

British were mainly a Military Force till 1857. They have established many Laws by that time but primarily all were meant to rob Indians of their wealth. But 1857 Revolt ousted them out of power and no British soldier was left by Oct, 1857. But they came back again in late 1858 with 10 times more ammunition and captured India from all directions.

But 1857 taught a lesson to the British and they started involving Indians into the Govt formation. More civil institutions were established like Indian Railways, Indian Judiciary, Indian Engineers Institute etc. And promoted English Convent education. Do you think English Convents are for over 20s?

By the end of WW-1 in 1918, all Educational Institutes, all Muncipalities, all Civic Corporations had 90% of Indians. Most importantly the BAR Associations of Law Practise had 90% Indians. Where do you think people like Mahatma Gandhi finished their studies? Most of the Front line leaders of Indian Independence struggle like Sardar Patel, Jinnah, Dadabai Nauroji etc were all Lawyers. And they studied and graduated from the schools and colleges established by the British.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, AWS said:

Hahaa 

good evaru kaadu

mughals came here and settled, what ever good or bad they did to india they did it as citizens of india

british came here to steal, they never treat them as indians eventjough some one born in india during that time. They treat india only exporter of raw material like they export cotton from india to london on low price and they make cloths and import to india with high prices

Thats all propaganda by the Gandhi-family owned free India. Dhavaleswaram Anacut was built around 1840s by a British Engineer which is still feeding AP. 

British were ready to leave India by 1918 after the end of WW-1 as they had only 10,000 Army left deployed around present day India, SL, B'desh, Pakistan, Nepal, Burma and Singapore plus some parts of Malaysia and China. They know they cannot continue ruling India.

But then they saw a soft-sh!t like M Gandhi whose principle of Non-Violence helped British continue their Empire instead of winding up. Gandhi never encouraged Violence and for that reason people like Balgangadhar Tilak, Bhagat Singh and Alluri were branded as terrorists that time. 

Tell me who is the main benefactor if the Indians adopt Non-Violence? Its obviously the British as they need only a minimal Police to control the dissent arousing from general Indians.  

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ysshakeela said:

Nee bondha, chadivithe proper gaa History chaduvu boss, leekapoothe leedhu.

British were mainly a Military Force till 1857. They have established many Laws by that time but primarily all were meant to rob Indians of their wealth. But 1857 Revolt ousted them out of power and no British soldier was left by Oct, 1857. But they came back again in late 1858 with 10 times more ammunition and captured India from all directions.

But 1857 taught a lesson to the British and they started involving Indians into the Govt formation. More civil institutions were established like Indian Railways, Indian Judiciary, Indian Engineers Institute etc. And promoted English Convent education. Do you think English Convents are for over 20s?

By the end of WW-1 in 1918, all Educational Institutes, all Muncipalities, all Civic Corporations had 90% of Indians. Most importantly the BAR Associations of Law Practise had 90% Indians. Where do you think people like Mahatma Gandhi finished their studies? Most of the Front line leaders of Indian Independence struggle like Sardar Patel, Jinnah, Dadabai Nauroji etc were all Lawyers. And they studied and graduated from the schools and colleges established by the British.

Arey erri pushpa did you atleast googled what is ICS?

nuvvu cheppede history migatvaladdi nonsense ane nee overconfidence ki i am laughing with my arss raa

You said before 1856 they are military force that biggest wring they were called east india company. Basically a business having a private army and they involved in local politics and helped local kings.

 Next after 1856 britsh queen abolished the east india company and made it as british empire. 
 

nenu cheppindi kooda gumastaa jobs kosam ane kadaraa vallu english local ga start chesindhi. Vallu manavallani inly gumasta jobs lone vuncharu 

have you heared Simon goback asalu adi enduku jarigindho

stop dreaming like british thought us english for india benefit….they did just for gumasta slavery

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ysshakeela said:

Thats all propaganda by the Gandhi-family owned free India. Dhavaleswaram Anacut was built around 1840s by a British Engineer which is still feeding AP. 

British were ready to leave India by 1918 after the end of WW-1 as they had only 10,000 Army left deployed around present day India, SL, B'desh, Pakistan, Nepal, Burma and Singapore plus some parts of Malaysia and China. They know they cannot continue ruling India.

But then they saw a soft-sh!t like M Gandhi whose principle of Non-Violence helped British continue their Empire instead of winding up. Gandhi never encouraged Violence and for that reason people like Balgangadhar Tilak, Bhagat Singh and Alluri were branded as terrorists that time. 

Tell me who is the main benefactor if the Indians adopt Non-Violence? Its obviously the British as they need only a minimal Police to control the dissent arousing from general Indians.  

 

Nee opinion ni history gaa cheppmaaka

jarigindhi cheppu

all conspiracy $hit heads

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ysshakeela said:

Thats all propaganda by the Gandhi-family owned free India. Dhavaleswaram Anacut was built around 1840s by a British Engineer which is still feeding AP. 

British were ready to leave India by 1918 after the end of WW-1 as they had only 10,000 Army left deployed around present day India, SL, B'desh, Pakistan, Nepal, Burma and Singapore plus some parts of Malaysia and China. They know they cannot continue ruling India.

But then they saw a soft-sh!t like M Gandhi whose principle of Non-Violence helped British continue their Empire instead of winding up. Gandhi never encouraged Violence and for that reason people like Balgangadhar Tilak, Bhagat Singh and Alluri were branded as terrorists that time. 

Tell me who is the main benefactor if the Indians adopt Non-Violence? Its obviously the British as they need only a minimal Police to control the dissent arousing from general Indians.  

 

nee comedy maamooluga ledhu gaa

inta sympathy choopistunnav british paina

after WW1 who did the round table conference drama?

who attended first round table? leaders andarini jails lo petti round table ki rammanppudu emindi british sincerity about india freedom?

antha dayaa hrudyalu mari jaliyan vaala bhag enduku chesaru?

read history as history dont be another QAonn

malla nuvvu cheppadam naaku proper ga history chaduvu ani

hahahaa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...