People in red states enjoy

[Raven_Rayes]

1 hour ago, MRI said:

may be.. depends on what it is being used for.. advocating for a woman's health is ok.. but it is not her choice all the time..

But banning it is okay i guess

[Iriswest]

4 hours ago, MRI said:

may be.. depends on what it is being used for.. advocating for a woman's health is ok.. but it is not her choice all the time..

Why is it not her choice again? You can always advocate whatever you want a woman should and shouldn’t do. Don’t force it on her. 

[Raven_Rayes]

27 minutes ago, Iriswest said:

Why is it not her choice again? You can always advocate whatever you want a woman should and shouldn’t do. Don’t force it on her. 

they are going to use the same logic that was used for roe v wade, to bring back anti-miscegenation laws.

it'll be funny when states start banning interracial marriage.

then these guys whose life ambition is to have a white gf will start crying. lol.

[MRI]

1 hour ago, Iriswest said:

Why is it not her choice again? You can always advocate whatever you want a woman should and shouldn’t do. Don’t force it on her. 

Stop claiming baby as her property and wish when both man and woman are the reason. 

[Raven_Rayes]

3 hours ago, MRI said:

Stop claiming baby as her property and wish when both man and woman are the reason. 

stop your bs pretense like you were born in the US.

do you see this dialogue around abortion happening in any other country? In most countries, this is not even an issue. Or handled by the doctor and the girl in question.

[Iriswest]

10 hours ago, MRI said:

Stop claiming baby as her property and wish when both man and woman are the reason. 

Where are they even saying that if the father consents, it can be aborted?????? It’s a ridiculous blanket rule that says any foetus cannot be aborted. That is the level of stupidity women have to deal with.

[MRI]

3 minutes ago, Iriswest said:

Where are they even saying that if the father consents, it can be aborted?????? It’s a ridiculous blanket rule that says any foetus cannot be aborted. That is the level of stupidity women have to deal with.

 

On 5/7/2022 at 10:26 PM, Iriswest said:

It’s a woman’s uterus. That is HER body part.  Implantation of embryo doesn’t happen after informing the mother. That is autonomous and happens even if she doesn’t agree to it, even if she has taken every precaution on earth for it to not happen. SHE and only she has the right to decide to nourish the embryo or not, because she is THE part of reproductive system(not mother yet) that can sustain life.

Same way, women are dictating that they can do whatever they want. Highlighted is the part of hypocrisy men have to deal with.

I have stronger words to say but I am not going to say it to you. Vere vallaki. Stop sleeping around and using men, and then say your body your wish.

[Iriswest]

10 hours ago, MRI said:

Stop claiming baby as her property and wish when both man and woman are the reason. 

Their main intent is to curtail planned parenthood. Like good olden days when people had kids left and right without thinking much about finances. A good way to keep people from getting rich quicker. They want to ingrain the thought that abortion is going against God. And they are audacious enough to make it a law even when the mother is at risk????? Is this even a first world country?
 

Look beyond their histrionics, they want to blackmail you that women are killing babies. The bigger picture is they want to keep your rights in check.

[MRI]

1 minute ago, Iriswest said:

Their main intent is to curtail planned parenthood. Like good olden days when people had kids left and right without thinking much about finances. A good way to keep people from getting rich quicker. They want to ingrain the thought that abortion is going against God. And they are audacious enough to make it a law even when the mother is at risk????? Is this even a first world country?
 

Look beyond their histrionics, they want to blackmail you that women are killing babies. The bigger picture is they want to keep your rights in check.

Can you point to me the laws that forbid abortions when mom's health is at risk? I may change my opinion if this is true. Please don't quote me news links by liberal media.

 

define rich. Money or happiness? People may start arguing here as well.

 

If that is the case, why are women going the liberal way and not libertarian? The new age mahila sanghalu are these people. 

[Pavanonline]

2 minutes ago, Iriswest said:

Their main intent is to curtail planned parenthood. Like good olden days when people had kids left and right without thinking much about finances. A good way to keep people from getting rich quicker. They want to ingrain the thought that abortion is going against God. And they are audacious enough to make it a law even when the mother is at risk????? Is this even a first world country?
 

Look beyond their histrionics, they want to blackmail you that women are killing babies. The bigger picture is they want to keep your rights in check.

 

14 minutes ago, Iriswest said:

Where are they even saying that if the father consents, it can be aborted?????? It’s a ridiculous blanket rule that says any foetus cannot be aborted. That is the level of stupidity women have to deal with.

antha ne imagination lo undi, event he reddest states have no blanket ban on abortion. Cancelling Roe doesn't ban anything, it moves it to states to make legislation. 

[Iriswest]

9 minutes ago, MRI said:

 

Same way, women are dictating that they can do whatever they want. Highlighted is the part of hypocrisy men have to deal with.

I have stronger words to say but I am not going to say it to you. Vere vallaki. Stop sleeping around and using men, and then say your body your wish.

Rajaa, you are talking as if all women are hell bent on getting abortions. Look at who will get hurt most by this law. Sex workers/women who cannot afford to have kids (even after taking precautions)/ rape cases/ babies that have genetical defects. Can you give them a solution what to do if they get pregnant?

[MRI]

3 minutes ago, Pavanonline said:

 

antha ne imagination lo undi, event he reddest states have no blanket ban on abortion. Cancelling Roe doesn't ban anything, it moves it to states to make legislation. 

exactly.. all the court said was they do not have the right to frame legislation.. they just enforce it and the legislature needs to roll out new laws.. liberal media drama telisindega..

[MRI]

7 minutes ago, Iriswest said:

Rajaa, you are talking as if all women are hell bent on getting abortions. Look at who will get hurt most by this law. Sex workers/women who cannot afford to have kids (even after taking precautions)/ rape cases/ babies that have genetical defects. Can you give them a solution what to do if they get pregnant?

I reverted back the blanket statements you made.. the law will also stop those some women who want to commit murder.. 

own the pregnancy or they can stop from becoming pregnant.. Vasectomy or sterilization is the answer. deeni taggara kooda vankalu cheppaku inka..

[Iriswest]

9 minutes ago, Pavanonline said:

 

antha ne imagination lo undi, event he reddest states have no blanket ban on abortion. Cancelling Roe doesn't ban anything, it moves it to states to make legislation. 

Ma daridrapu Texas lo undi ga. Any abortion after 6 weeks is illegal. That is just one week away from missed period. Even pregnancy tests show negative when there is very low hcg level at 6 weeks.

[Iriswest]

8 minutes ago, MRI said:

exactly.. all the court said was they do not have the right to frame legislation.. they just enforce it and the legislature needs to roll out new laws.. liberal media drama telisindega..

The only way for women in Texas to get abortion is to go out of state.