10 rupees petti condom konukko kunda...why are people breaking their heads

[MRI]

9 minutes ago, veerigadu said:

Reproductive rights. Under this clause, they can decide when they can have a baby.
 

If they find that it’s not going to work for them socially, safety wise or economically.

They can get an abortion. It’s their right. They did not plan for it. It’s unplanned and may be accidental. 
 

State cannot enforce and tell them to have a baby when it was not something they are interested in. That’s like taking away their rights. 
 
People might be careful 99/100 times. However there is always that unwanted pregnancy whether it’s a case of unplanned or a rape situation. That’s my opinion. One should leave it to woman. If she decides to kill. It’s on her conscience. Until the baby is born and touches the land of this mighty nation. Law cannot be enforced upon the unborn fetus. Once the baby is delivered. He/she is a property of this nation. Period. 

Period period anukuntu mee agenda ni andari meeda ruddalanukuntey debate cheyadam enduku??

Where your arguments fall behind is the cases most list.. rape, accidental, life risk.. all these are allowed by all states if i am not wrong.. doesn't the person know within a certain period on whether she wants the baby or not?? undeveloped organs antunnaru.. late in time.. i do not know all these cases.. this certainly is a topic of debate if the law doesn't allow already..

woke virus ippudu vachindi.. 1973 lo courts overstep chesinappudu emayyaru?? you still can implement this through legislation.. Biden gaadu nidra potunnada?? vaadu anukuntey entha sepu idi?? hypocrisy gallu..

[MRI]

3 minutes ago, sarvayogi said:

ok ok ok. I cant read the 3 pages now..whats the solution for this..rule is passed 

social media kodukul will blabber for a week or so...prabhutvalu will never go back on this

so is it like people will use all their HIGH FREQUENCY words in DB twitter and just forget after a month or so

no rule was passed. Understand that first.

[Pavanonline]

18 minutes ago, veerigadu said:

The ban on abortion judgement is based on grounds of 14th amendment. Whereas guns issue is releated to 2nd. There is a commonality. All these are stemming from amendments and rights. 

Not sure if you have enough knowledge on this subject. Oh here you go. Atleast you learnt something today. Thanks to this post. You are welcome 

2nd amendment explicitly mentions arms, 14th amendment is about due process, nothing about abortion is even close to it which is why the latest ruling overturned it.
When roe was ruled more than 30 states had a ban but somehow scotus ruled it was a fundamental right. even your favorite Rbg agreed roe stands on shaky ground. And you can’t just take text either you need to go back and see the debate around those amendments to make sense of those amendments. 

[MRI]

1 minute ago, Pavanonline said:

2nd amendment explicitly mentions arms, 14th amendment is about due process, nothing about abortion is even close to it which is why the latest ruling overturned it.
When roe was ruled more than 30 states had a ban but somehow scotus ruled it was a fundamental right. even your favorite Rbg agreed roe stands on shaky ground. And you can’t just take text either you need to go back and see the debate around those amendments to make sense of those amendments. 

incorrect. They expressed an opinion. That was not a ruling. Courts have the authority to express their opinion and recommend something for the lawmakers. Whether the lawmakers consider their opinion or wipe their ass is up to them. Courts do not have the authority to introduce a law. They just need to interpret them, defined by the legislature. in 1973, court overstepped its boundaries. Now the court corrected their overreach and left it to the legislature to define whatever they want.

[Pavanonline]

2 minutes ago, MRI said:

Period period anukuntu mee agenda ni andari meeda ruddalanukuntey debate cheyadam enduku??

Where your arguments fall behind is the cases most list.. rape, accidental, life risk.. all these are allowed by all states if i am not wrong.. doesn't the person know within a certain period on whether she wants the baby or not?? undeveloped organs antunnaru.. late in time.. i do not know all these cases.. this certainly is a topic of debate if the law doesn't allow already..

woke virus ippudu vachindi.. 1973 lo courts overstep chesinappudu emayyaru?? you still can implement this through legislation.. Biden gaadu nidra potunnada?? vaadu anukuntey entha sepu idi?? hypocrisy gallu..

They didn’t do anything because they want the courts to do their dirty work, same with gun control. They know they’ll miserably fail if they take these issues to ballot. 
comedy entante they wouldn’t have majority conservative judges if harry reid didn’t remove filibuster when dems controlled senate. All their disaster started there which they won’t talk and now want to remove filibuster, pure comedy gold.

[veerigadu]

10 minutes ago, Pavanonline said:

2nd amendment explicitly mentions arms, 14th amendment is about due process, nothing about abortion is even close to it which is why the latest ruling overturned it.
When roe was ruled more than 30 states had a ban but somehow scotus ruled it was a fundamental right. even your favorite Rbg agreed roe stands on shaky ground. And you can’t just take text either you need to go back and see the debate around those amendments to make sense of those amendments. 

Arms ante pistols and muskets. That’s all back in the day. Now even small sizeddd bumbbbbbssss is considered under the broad definition of arms. Do we allow them then.? 14th amendment is about all rights. It may not say specifically mention about abortion and masturbation. But indeed talks about rights. Whether to have a baby or not is a right. Unless state is going to sponsor and pay for the kids and family. Also it should Provide protection from death in case of medical complications. 

[sarvayogi]

7 minutes ago, MRI said:

no rule was passed. Understand that first.

taxes and inflation lu periginappudu okkadu matladadu..."mee mohal manda why should I pay inflated prices or why cant you reduce taxes" ani..all holes muskuni kadataru...ee condom topics la matram rayy rayy ani vastaru andaru..every tom and dick raises his voice..

saavandi andaru...

[Pavanonline]

4 minutes ago, MRI said:

incorrect. They expressed an opinion. That was not a ruling. Courts have the authority to express their opinion and recommend something for the lawmakers. Whether the lawmakers consider their opinion or wipe their ass is up to them. Courts do not have the authority to introduce a law. They just need to interpret them, defined by the legislature. in 1973, court overstepped its boundaries. Now the court corrected their overreach and left it to the legislature to define whatever they want.

That’s what I said too, they twisted the constitution to grant something which was never the intention of it.

[kittaya]

6 hours ago, Vaampire said:

Naaku telisina friend vallu pregnancy 5th month lo telisindi baby heart ki issue undi. Life long issue undochu ani.  Appudu vallu unna state lo laws oppukovu ani verey state ki vellaru. Ilanti scenarios chaala untayi. 
 

Abortion itself is very tough decision for women. Why make it more complex for them. 

Heart issues mostly will cure... Asaluu baby ni kill cheytammm devudah... Some cases it's okk

[pakeer_saab]

47 minutes ago, veerigadu said:

The ban on abortion judgement is based on grounds of 14th amendment. Whereas guns issue is releated to 2nd. There is a commonality. All these are stemming from amendments and rights. 

Not sure if you have enough knowledge on this subject. Oh here you go. Atleast you learnt something today. Thanks to this post. You are welcome 

I don't need a lecture on which amendment is what, point is how are those 2 related as you brought it up, dont show you aak is pak skills here

[pakeer_saab]

49 minutes ago, veerigadu said:

The ban on abortion judgement is based on grounds of 14th amendment. Whereas guns issue is releated to 2nd. There is a commonality. All these are stemming from amendments and rights. 

Not sure if you have enough knowledge on this subject. Oh here you go. Atleast you learnt something today. Thanks to this post. You are welcome 

commonality just bcoz they both are amendments 😁, this is why say you need some life experience not brainwashing

[pakeer_saab]

53 minutes ago, MRI said:

5th amendment aa 3rd amendment aa bro nuvvu analanukunnadi??

let him ask his libtard mentor, ala sudden ga adigite ela??

[Pavanonline]

18 minutes ago, veerigadu said:

Arms ante pistols and muskets. That’s all back in the day. Now even small sizeddd bumbbbbbssss is considered under the broad definition of arms. Do we allow them then.? 14th amendment is about all rights. It may not say specifically about abortion and masturbation. But indeed talks about rights. Whether to have a baby or not is a right. Unless state is going to sponsor and pay for the kids and family. Also it should Provide protection from death in case of medical complications. 

Yes even canons were owned by people. Today we have much watered down version. The 2nd amendment ruling that you didn’t like, read about it. Ny made a law saying you need to convince a bureaucrat why you need a gun to carry it outside which is what 2nd amendment explicitly prohibits. No other amendment works that way is what the court said. 

14th amendment doesn’t include privacy rights , they are in 4th amendment where govt can’t do unauthorized searches and seizures. Again you are pointing at the wrong tree. Onus is on politicians to make laws , courts should not do It no matter how right they think it is. There are avenues to address all shortcomings using legislature which is accountable to the people. It idiotic people protesting in ny, ca and other states that allow abortion till baby is out. If people of Texas don’t like their law it’s for them to send lawmakers that make laws supporting abortion. Right now people of texas don’t like abortions and have strict rules. You think texas politicians are doing it for fun? They are reacting to their voters. People of Florida and Arizona are okay until 15 weeks. So if dems are so sure it’s a winning topic, take it to elections. Midterms are here now. 

[pakeer_saab]

17 minutes ago, veerigadu said:

Arms ante pistols and muskets. That’s all back in the day. Now even small sizeddd bumbbbbbssss is considered under the broad definition of arms. Do we allow them then.? 14th amendment is about all rights. It may not say specifically mention about abortion and masturbation. But indeed talks about rights. Whether to have a baby or not is a right. Unless state is going to sponsor and pay for the kids and family. Also it should Provide protection from death in case of medical complications. 

liberals wanted to save humanity from extinction due to pollution but want to kill babies through abortion, isn't that an irony??

[veerigadu]

2 minutes ago, Pavanonline said:

Yes even canons were owned by people. Today we have much watered down version. The 2nd amendment ruling that you didn’t like, read about it. Ny made a law saying you need to convince a bureaucrat why you need a gun to carry it outside which is what 2nd amendment explicitly prohibits. No other amendment works that way is what the court said. 

14th amendment doesn’t include privacy rights , they are in 4th amendment where govt can’t do unauthorized searches and seizures. Again you are pointing at the wrong tree. Onus is on politicians to make laws , courts should not do It no matter how right they think it is. There are avenues to address all shortcomings using legislature which is accountable to the people. It idiotic people protesting in ny, ca and other states that allow abortion till baby is out. If people of Texas don’t like their law it’s for them to send lawmakers that make laws supporting abortion. Right now people of texas don’t like abortions and have strict rules. People of Florida and Arizona are okay until 15 weeks. 

Agreed. As is every red state other than Texas is a shitttttt hole. Now they will degenerate further and turn into a taliban. I’m very sure this will only help dems to get hold of house and senate soon. The legislations will be made even at the federal level soon. 
 

There was time one of the amendments said only male citizens can vote but not females. Now it’s amended to make it applicable to all. Conservatives can probably slower the progress but history has repeatedly proved that we will progress. I rest my case here