10 year experienced employee vs 3 year experience employee

[veerigadu]

are working at same company and have same job day to day responsibilities, can a 10 year experienced employee still deserve 40% more salary?

Never understood this whole more experience fundaaaaa.

Objectively speaking, Unless senior experienced person is take over some additional responsibilities than a rookie, experienced person is no way superior right?

[Piracy Raja]

Experience(10 years) teaches fools(3 years) ani @Ja_Janaka_Janaare eppudo cheppadu ga

[veerigadu]

14 minutes ago, Piracy Raja said:

Experience(10 years) teaches fools(3 years) ani @Ja_Janaka_Janaare eppudo cheppadu ga

I have seen fools regardless of their exp. Its an invalid assumption. 

[Trump_is_a_moron9]

32 minutes ago, veerigadu said:

are working at same company and have same job day to day responsibilities, can a 10 year experienced employee still deserve 40% more salary?

Never understood this whole more experience fundaaaaa.

Objectively speaking, Unless senior experienced person is take over some additional responsibilities than a rookie, experienced person is no way superior right?

7 more years of experience at just 40% more salary ante, I'll almost always prefer the experienced one. The average 10 year experienced person is faster and more efficient than 3 year experienced ones. Let's take code for example. Not only does the 10 exp guy do things faster, his coding practises also will be better in terms of readability, maintainability and extendability because he would have already seen the issues that bite back in the ass later. And then there are also some deviations in tasks like a developer being asked to do something out of his comfort zone (eg. switching test unit framework or database) and then too the experienced guy would come ahead because he must have seen something similar in his decade of experience. If a 10 year experienced guy is a similarly skilled with a 3 year one, they shouldn't even be working in the same company. One of them undervalued (joined a sub par company for his skillset) or overvalued (fake resume etc) 

[teluguraja]

6 minutes ago, Trump_is_a_moron9 said:

7 more years of experience at just 40% more salary ante, I'll almost always prefer the experienced one. The average 10 year experienced person is faster and more efficient than 3 year experienced ones. Let's take code for example. Not only does the 10 exp guy do things faster, his coding practises also will be better in terms of readability, maintainability and extendability because he would have already seen the issues that bite back in the ass later. And then there are also some deviations in tasks like a developer being asked to do something out of his comfort zone (eg. switching test unit framework or database) and then too the experienced guy would come ahead because he must have seen something similar in his decade of experience. If a 10 year experienced guy is a similarly skilled with a 3 year one, they shouldn't even be working in the same company. One of them undervalued (joined a sub par company for his skillset) or overvalued (fake resume etc) 

well said

[Piracy Raja]

3 years exp employee - @veerigadu

valla office lo senior meda widow crying thread as usual 

[AndhraPickles]

1 hour ago, veerigadu said:

are working at same company and have same job day to day responsibilities, can a 10 year experienced employee still deserve 40% more salary?

Never understood this whole more experience fundaaaaa.

Objectively speaking, Unless senior experienced person is take over some additional responsibilities than a rookie, experienced person is no way superior right?

Yes brother...ur 100% correct

[jalsa01]

1 hour ago, veerigadu said:

are working at same company and have same job day to day responsibilities, can a 10 year experienced employee still deserve 40% more salary?

Never understood this whole more experience fundaaaaa.

Objectively speaking, Unless senior experienced person is take over some additional responsibilities than a rookie, experienced person is no way superior right?

10 yrs exp surgeon and 3 yrs exp surgeon both does same operation.. who is best in this case?

[SGB]

1 hour ago, veerigadu said:

are working at same company and have same job day to day responsibilities, can a 10 year experienced employee still deserve 40% more salary?

Never understood this whole more experience fundaaaaa.

Objectively speaking, Unless senior experienced person is take over some additional responsibilities than a rookie, experienced person is no way superior right?

I’m surprised you are asking this DUMB question around “experience” and still arguing both candidates should be paid equally regardless of their experience!

@Trump_is_a_moron9 said what needs to be said and nailed the topic. You can close this thread now…

[veerigadu]

9 minutes ago, SGB said:

I’m surprised you are asking this DUMB question around “experience” and still arguing both candidates should be paid equally regardless of their experience!

@Trump_is_a_moron9 said what needs to be said and nailed the topic. You can close this thread now…

Bokka lee.....It doesnt matter if both are doing same job and generate same output. 

I only agree in those cases where programmers can code better as well generate more value to company. Otherwise, its immaterial if it does not generate any time or money-based value.

Only some musaliii experienced valla paithyammm idanthaaa. 

[Swatkat]

40 minutes ago, Piracy Raja said:

3 years exp employee - @veerigadu

valla office lo senior meda widow crying thread as usual 

Hahahahahah

[Swatkat]

Enni seppina andharu inka malinga gadu acceot cheyadu 3 years nibba ne great antadu. 

[veerigadu]

4 minutes ago, Swatkat said:

Enni seppina andharu inka malinga gadu acceot cheyadu 3 years nibba ne great antadu. 

Areyyy db janalaaa gurinchiiii theliseee matladuthunnava??? herd mentality ki mother husband galluuuu. Nuvvu chill ayipooooo

[veerigadu]

47 minutes ago, Piracy Raja said:

3 years exp employee - @veerigadu

valla office lo senior meda widow crying thread as usual 

yes true bro...But aaadu neekantee peddhaaa KVP gaduu...Btw Neee experience 10 kantee ekkuvee naaa? 

[SGB]

16 minutes ago, veerigadu said:

Bokka lee.....It doesnt matter if both are doing same job and generate same output. 

I only agree in those cases where programmers can code better as well generate more value to company. Otherwise, its immaterial if it does not generate any time or money-based value.

Only some musaliii experienced valla paithyammm idanthaaa. 

output will not be the same in terms of quality of work or time taken.

So if you are hiring for your own company, would you hire the one with 3 years or the one with 10 years?? yeah right!

Experience matters! You are saying that the qualified HR Executives of all these billion/trillion Dollar companies hiring candidates and paying matching salaries to candidates based on experience are doing it wrong and they should learn from your false wisdom because you think you know more than them? Leave alone those ultra large companies, not even a single person on this forum will agree with you because you are grossly mistaken.

so, why did you start this thread knowing that you were wrong?