Jump to content

#Gachibowli Diwakarams Cricket Disco#


Sucker

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Naaperushiva said:

BTW the best ODI innings antey Bevan dhi WI medha 1996 lo chasing a target of 173 aus looses their top 6 for 35 odd runs and with 3 wkts needing 99 of 96 balls...they pulled off a victory with one wkt

Nenu Monna oka video chusa Asia VS Rest of the world. Vaadu one man army sussu poyinchadu Asia bowlers ki. Baagundhi aa innings. HD kosam chusthunna yevaranna chestharemo ani

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Naaperushiva said:

Many consider that as luck..but i would say as a wkt keeper he used to observe what the batsmen is doing very well..and used to ask the bowlers to bowl according to it and also field placements kooda out of the box vundevi..

I wouldn't call that luck baa..oka saari ayithe luck chaala saarlu ayithe dhanni luck anaru anukuntunna

Do you think joginder bowled what dhoni suggested to get misbah and catch to sreeshanth come on man for every successful person there is luck.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CaptainCool said:

I Agree in that Era teams had some world class bowlers , different field restrictions etc ,
but this is Just Comparison Stats between MSD and Dhoni

Their strike rates are strikingly different with Bevan making his runs at 74.16 and Dhoni making his at 88.40. Also, the numbers of sixes hit by the two are vastly different, with Dhoni hitting 217 sixes, to Bevan’s 21 sixes.
This gives Dhoni a big edge over Bevan in the better hitter department

In chases, Dhoni has 46 not outs in 174 matches, while Bevan has 30 not outs from 112 matches. Bevan’s strike rate is 67.60, while Dhoni made his runs at 81.50.

Before Dhoni, India failed to chase down runs, mostly in important games (cue 1996 World Cup semi-final vs. Sri Lanka). They loved batting first and then defend targets. However, since Dhoni’s arrival, things have changed a lot

Both Bevan and MSD are amazing at running between the wickets, assessing risk, assessing the situation and playing with the lower middle order and lower order batsmen.

MSD had a longer career than Bevan and with the added responsibility of keeping wickets.

MS Dhoni has had to endure the pressure of more than a billion people as captain

Therefore, the history of ODI and limited overs cricket will definitely crown MS Dhoni as the greatest finisher of all time, an accolade he deserves when we consider stats , pressure and extra responsibilities MSD had to deal with.

Bevan ganni ODI specialist Ani stamp vesi okka test kuda aadanivvaledhu fafam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CaptainCool said:

I Agree in that Era teams had some world class bowlers , different field restrictions etc ,
but this is Just Comparison Stats between MSD and Dhoni

Their strike rates are strikingly different with Bevan making his runs at 74.16 and Dhoni making his at 88.40. Also, the numbers of sixes hit by the two are vastly different, with Dhoni hitting 217 sixes, to Bevan’s 21 sixes.
This gives Dhoni a big edge over Bevan in the better hitter department

In chases, Dhoni has 46 not outs in 174 matches, while Bevan has 30 not outs from 112 matches. Bevan’s strike rate is 67.60, while Dhoni made his runs at 81.50.

Before Dhoni, India failed to chase down runs, mostly in important games (cue 1996 World Cup semi-final vs. Sri Lanka). They loved batting first and then defend targets. However, since Dhoni’s arrival, things have changed a lot

Both Bevan and MSD are amazing at running between the wickets, assessing risk, assessing the situation and playing with the lower middle order and lower order batsmen.

MSD had a longer career than Bevan and with the added responsibility of keeping wickets.

MS Dhoni has had to endure the pressure of more than a billion people as captain

Therefore, the history of ODI and limited overs cricket will definitely crown MS Dhoni as the greatest finisher of all time, an accolade he deserves when we consider stats , pressure and extra responsibilities MSD had to deal with.

two different eras u are comparing all together...30 not outs anutunnav vs 46 not outs that makes Bevan's Avg even better...As notouts boosts ur avg right...Before 2000's count how many times a team has scored 300+ vs after 2000

u'll get ur answer...

 

Agreed on Captain part....No doubt in that being a captain that's added pressure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, argadorn said:

Do you think joginder bowled what dhoni suggested to get misbah and catch to sreeshanth come on man for every successful person there is luck.. 

AA T20 WC lo Misbah gadu almost Pakis ni winner chesadu. Just one wrong shot. League stage la Sreesanth gadu baaga defend chesadu final Joginder aithe out of syllabus 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sucker said:

Bevan ganni ODI specialist Ani stamp vesi okka test kuda aadanivvaledhu fafam

yes though he had a very good first class avg(57ish)...he never made it big in the test arena..

Reason he failed initially and also Aus middle order competition tight vuntundey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Naaperushiva said:

two different eras u are comparing all together...30 not outs anutunnav vs 46 not outs that makes Bevan's Avg even better...As notouts boosts ur avg right...Before 2000's count how many times a team has scored 300+ vs after 2000

u'll get ur answer...

Here the discussion is about best finisher so - it matters how many times u won it for your team by staying not out

Even Bevan Agrees

https://www.instagram.com/p/Ce9YL2QuZw-/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CaptainCool said:

Here is discussion about best finisher so - it matters how many times u won it for your team by staying not out

Even Bevan Agrees

https://www.instagram.com/p/Ce9YL2QuZw-/?utm_source=ig_embed&utm_campaign=loading

 

What he agreed i dont get it ..He is a brilliant finisher ani adhi correct ey...

ippudu sachin ni Ponting gurinchi adigithe he is a fantastic batsmen and captain ane antaadu gaa baa..

That's called as humility..

COming to 46 no's convo actually iddaru rate same vundhi Dhoni played 60 more matches as a result 16 more not outs ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Naaperushiva said:

What he agreed i dont get it ..He is a brilliant finisher ani adhi correct ey...

ippudu sachin ni Ponting gurinchi adigithe he is a fantastic batsmen and captain ane antaadu gaa baa..

That's called as humility..

COming to 46 no's convo actually iddaru rate same vundhi Dhoni played 60 more matches as a result 16 more not outs ...

No body asked him in the first place , he has posted on his own - Again i can only comment on what i saw and stats and extra responsibilities players had to go through so for me its MSD - For you its Bevan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Sucker said:

Nenu Monna oka video chusa Asia VS Rest of the world. Vaadu one man army sussu poyinchadu Asia bowlers ki. Baagundhi aa innings. HD kosam chusthunna yevaranna chestharemo ani

I remember Bevan mostly from playing cricket trump cards as a kid

most notouts and best average, and then after this mammoth innings, he won me many cards/ pocket money because of this beast of a score .. fun school times.. 🤓

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Naaperushiva said:

I would say both Dhoni and Bevan were equally impressive...the only reason i chose Bevan over Dhoni was because those days a batting avg of 50+ was never heard of in white ball cricket and also lower order never used to play as good modern day players...

also add running b/w wickets, quick 1 & 2 etc, outstanding fielder, and handy bowler chipping in...

technically his is Mr. Cricket for Oz before M.Hussey

S. Waugh mentions about him quite a lot in many of his interviews about him being cool headed and a great team mate with other players..

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Naaperushiva said:

yes though he had a very good first class avg(57ish)...he never made it big in the test arena..

Reason he failed initially and also Aus middle order competition tight vuntundey

Yes, it was between G.Blewett and M.Bevan for this spots both in Tests and ODI's

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One difference between Bevan and Dhoni generation are the pitches as well...

In Dhoni's time, there were more batting friendly pitches and power plays to boost chasings and high scoring games..

51 minutes ago, Naaperushiva said:

What he agreed i dont get it ..He is a brilliant finisher ani adhi correct ey...

ippudu sachin ni Ponting gurinchi adigithe he is a fantastic batsmen and captain ane antaadu gaa baa..

That's called as humility..

COming to 46 no's convo actually iddaru rate same vundhi Dhoni played 60 more matches as a result 16 more not outs ...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...