Ponniyin Selvan Characters & Trailer Explained ...

[hunkyfunky2]

6 hours ago, Raven_Rayes said:

Tamils who are blaming Telugus for not liking the movie are assholes.

what about the telugus who use racist epithets for a silly movie? including you. all of you are idiots who are not fit to talk about movies.

 

Fcuker ... I don't have blue ticks on twitter - those with blue ticks openly criticized Telugu audience - including threatening future releases...

Get the f out 

 

[hunkyfunky2]

7 hours ago, dasari4kntr said:

@Raven_Rayes @hunkyfunky2

Listen to this review…very good points …unbiased…

 

I'll listen later...

Reason they didn't give introductions  is because some how they have this " superiority" mentality - most of them assume that world revolves around them ... Start your hateful comments , but this is proven many times - including this movie introductions ...

Mani ratnam missed establishing the conflict point - they should do it in trailer itself 

[Raven_Rayes]

14 minutes ago, hunkyfunky2 said:

Fcuker ... I don't have blue ticks on twitter - those with blue ticks openly criticized Telugu audience - including threatening future releases...

Get the f out 

 

You call yourself a movie lover. Go hide behind some fcuking blue tick to justify your own racism. Lmao.

 

[Raven_Rayes]

4 hours ago, Telugodura456 said:

Tamils dont use racist eptithets ? i have seen far worse behaviour there,

One guy from nellore told me he  tried to join a tamil coaching for iit..and the owner said iit is not for "people like you".

Not as casually and socially acceptable in Tamil circles as Telugu ones. Unless they are Tamil nationalists. Here ms educated scum do it. With pride. 

[Raven_Rayes]

4 hours ago, Telugodura456 said:

Nee thalakayi. All you are saying here in screenplay of dialogues.

I dont know tamil that fluently but from translations i have seen ..they are far inferior and generally tedious to screenplay in telugu..where dialouges are crisp and pack a punch.

Wtf is your problem idiot? What is 'screen play of dialogues' ? 

How are you this inarticulate and still manage to feel like you have to say something? 

Are you saying that Tamil dialogues are inferior to screenplay in Telugu? What a stupid general thing to say. 

[Raven_Rayes]

4 hours ago, Telugodura456 said:

so many words you use ra mental narsi. But the repeated comparision of brahmastra - a native hindi movie with baahubali a hindi dubbed movie - shows your game.

You speak with an undercurrent of jealousy and heartburn.

What jealousy? Lmao. Brahmastra did quite well when the idiot hunkyfunky was so cocksure that it won't. 

How does it matter if it's a Hindi or Telugu movie? 

Or did hunkyfunky mean only the Telugu states when he said it won't work? Lmao. 

Because a few films became hits idiots in this db and twitter suddenly become experts in cinema. Jokers.

[Raven_Rayes]

10 hours ago, Telugodura456 said:

Really ? I never heard that a reviewer's job is to act like a stenographer of director/artist and put in labor to explain his vision and propagandize his views.

A director already has full play of the medium of cinema to convey his vision - story, screenplay, artists, visual and audio effects, budget - why does he need people to further elaborate it ?

A reviewer job is to apply his (hopefully professional) level of understanding of film making and use that understanding to evaluate or judge the film. How can a reviewer avoid judging the film.

You neither have a commonsense understanding of review nor a scholarly one.

You first give up your underhand games of region/caste resentments then you have a chance to write better.

Interpreting a work of art is not a stenographers job. His job is to judge the film on the merits of what the director tried to achieve with it. Not pass silly judgements about whether the audience would like it. Or if the audience would connect to it. 

It is his job to make audience understand the film if the film is beyond understanding of the audience.

Not every movie is made like bahubali so that even 5yr olds can understand it. Duh! 

They are layers to filmmaking even in Rajamouli films that needs critics to expand and make our viewing experience better 

Show me a Telugu critic who writes or speaks about the film without referring to it from audience point of view? They all suck. Useless fcuks. 

Audience is usually dumb so I don't have the patience to sit through a review where the reviewer wants to connect with that dumb audience, only in a hurry to give it some fcuking rating. I can't take that much dumbfcukery.

[Raven_Rayes]

5 hours ago, hunkyfunky2 said:

I'll listen later...

Reason they didn't give introductions  is because some how they have this " superiority" mentality - most of them assume that world revolves around them ... Start your hateful comments , but this is proven many times - including this movie introductions ...

Mani ratnam missed establishing the conflict point - they should do it in trailer itself 

it looks like you are the one insecure about tamils making movies for themselves.

you want to be spoonfed like bahubali. stick to watching that kind of movies.

tamils will continue making movies for themselves. they don't need telugu market. they don't need stupid free advice from telugu 'movie lovers' with expert opinions that think they have superior mentality.

don't watch their movies and vomit your pent up racial hatred even more.

[Raven_Rayes]

9 hours ago, Telugodura456 said:

Really ? I never heard that a reviewer's job is to act like a stenographer of director/artist and put in labor to explain his vision and propagandize his views.

i didn't say 'professional' reviewer dumbfcuk. Any person with a passion for the work of art he enjoyed and can articulate a point of view of the movie that regular person cannot catch is good enough.

I don't read professional/scholarly reviewer in a hurry to rattle off some buzz words, and pretend like they are experts by critiquing the 'pacing' of the movie etc. I mean why should the movie have the right 'pacing'? what is even 'pacing'?

professional reviewers acting like trade pundits trying to gauge whether the movie will be liked by the common folk, and if it would do well commercially is bane of the visual medium. I have nothing but scorn for all those reviewers.

I don't need a reviewer to tell me about ps1, unless he has something to say that I didn't notice. anything good or bad. saying that it was hard to follow the story or characters blah blah is what dumbfcuks would say. If such a person calls himself a reviewer, its laughable.

[Telugodura456]

15 hours ago, Raven_Rayes said:

Interpreting a work of art is not a stenographers job. His job is to judge the film on the merits of what the director tried to achieve with it. Not pass silly judgements about whether the audience would like it. Or if the audience would connect to it. 

It is his job to make audience understand the film if the film is beyond understanding of the audience.

Not every movie is made like bahubali so that even 5yr olds can understand it. Duh! 

They are layers to filmmaking even in Rajamouli films that needs critics to expand and make our viewing experience better 

Show me a Telugu critic who writes or speaks about the film without referring to it from audience point of view? They all suck. Useless fcuks. 

Audience is usually dumb so I don't have the patience to sit through a review where the reviewer wants to connect with that dumb audience, only in a hurry to give it some fcuking rating. I can't take that much dumbfcukery.

LOL ..so you double down on the your dumb fuckery . Do you bother to ever re-read the nonsense you post?

Basically  you are implying ..Director makes "beyond understanding" films(whatever it means) -not for the audience - but for the reviewer. And its reviewer job to "explain" to audience and get them to watch it.

WTF????

Again and again r narsy you are a simple fool who is seduced by high sounding words but without making any attempts to understand what they mean. in this process you tarnish every high sounding and even praise worthy words.

Take "Right" for example. By calling doras whimsical and heartless decision to kick out SA people whenever they want as "Right" - you strip the word of all its meaning associated with justice and standing up for downtrodden.

In your mouth a "Right" becomes a thuggish entitlement of a dora or a upper caste goon like to you to wield at their whim and drive and kick out or reduce access to millions of people. To something they had to for 60 years in matter of year or two with like not only no discussion, But even deny the legitimacy of having a need for discussion ("not their business they have no right")

Shameful - really. Shameful morals.

[Telugodura456]

15 hours ago, Raven_Rayes said:

Not as casually and socially acceptable in Tamil circles as Telugu ones. Unless they are Tamil nationalists. Here ms educated scum do it. With pride. 

chaa.. neekedho tamil circles acces unnattu. If they really accepted you and you really like them as you pretend here to do so - you would never even bother to come to a forum like this.

Tamils are pretty active on social media.

 

[Telugodura456]

15 hours ago, Raven_Rayes said:

Wtf is your problem idiot? What is 'screen play of dialogues' ? 

How are you this inarticulate and still manage to feel like you have to say something? 

Are you saying that Tamil dialogues are inferior to screenplay in Telugu? What a stupid general thing to say. 

screen play ra idiot. All the crap you wrote about how with one dialogue someone established something - refers to Screenplay which is a script where dialogues are written.

I saw translation of tamil screenplay and dialogues in films like roja and some english subtitles - i didnt like them that much then. 

[hunkyfunky2]

tamils will continue making movies for themselves. they don't need telugu market.

 

Then don't complain about telugu people not watching - my comments are specifically against them - both blue ticks and few reviewers... As far as telugu and hindi people are considered, it is a boring slugfest with difficult to understand character names and 0 emotional connection - no one could answer one simple thing - who the viewer is supposed to root for? who is protagonist and antagonist ? don't say you don't need to - there are battles and mind games going on. 

 

[Raven_Rayes]

4 minutes ago, hunkyfunky2 said:

tamils will continue making movies for themselves. they don't need telugu market.

 

Then don't complain about telugu people not watching - my comments are specifically against them - both blue ticks and few reviewers... As far as telugu and hindi people are considered, it is a boring slugfest with difficult to understand character names and 0 emotional connection - no one could answer one simple thing - who the viewer is supposed to root for? who is protagonist and antagonist ? don't say you don't need to - there are battles and mind games going on. 

 

I don't. I don't care about the viewer or your views on the movie or the maker.

as long as you don't make racist remarks.

[Raven_Rayes]

1 hour ago, Telugodura456 said:

screen play ra idiot. All the crap you wrote about how with one dialogue someone established something - refers to Screenplay which is a script where dialogues are written.

I saw translation of tamil screenplay and dialogues in films like roja and some english subtitles - i didnt like them that much then. 

no idea what you are saying. pretty sure you don't too.

sounds like a childish way to tell someone that you don't appreciate a particular movie or maker.