Jump to content

homage to queen through a song


Telugodura456

Recommended Posts

Just now, Telugodura456 said:

moreover donga sotthu dhaani abba dochukunna ..dheeniki pettukovalsina avasaram yemundhi ..thirgi iccheyacchuga ?

Venakki ichi Mughal rule teesukuramantava?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DummyVariable said:

Venakki ichi Mughal rule teesukuramantava?

ardham kaale ..mughal rule manadegaara ekkadundhi ivvadaaniki.

its just decency to give back loot to where it was taken from. especially when you can clear trace where it came form.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Telugodura456 said:

ardham kaale ..mughal rule manadegaara ekkadundhi ivvadaaniki.

its just decency to give back loot to where it was taken from. especially when you can clear trace where it came form.

It is the price Hindus paid for their freedom from Muslim rule is the way I see it. Not seeing the relationship between wealth not being returned to actual cruelty by Thatcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DummyVariable said:

It is the price Hindus paid for their freedom from Muslim rule is the way I see it. 

ba. we would have got that freedom anyway. maha maha power ki colonies poyinai as soon as people rebelling. you think mughals could have stood up - no chance assala. we dont need brits for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Telugodura456 said:

ba. we would have got that freedom anyway. maha maha power ki colonies poyinai as soon as people rebelling. you think mughals could have stood up - no chance assala. we dont need brits for it.

Or we would all be Muslim. What makes you think that it would not have happened in 300 years? People tend to follow the religion of the leadership. India has Muslims and Christians because of Moghul and British rule. It would have only been a matter of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, DummyVariable said:

Or we would all be Muslim. What makes you think that it would not have happened in 300 years? People tend to follow the religion of the leadership. India has Muslims and Christians because of Moghul and British rule. It would have only been a matter of time.

they didnt convert in 1000 years. already shivaji was winning battles - went up to panipat. Jats were rebelling.

Vijayanagar empire was already there.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Telugodura456 said:

they didnt convert in 1000 years. already shivaji was winning battles - went up to panipat. Jats were rebelling.

Vijayanagar empire was already there.

 

The realities of 19th century were different. How many countries have minority leadership ruling over the majority? Why did the Nizam bring in the Razakkars? He wanted legitimacy to his rule by converting people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...