distributors ki refund ivadama correcta kadha????movie flop aithe

[veerigadu]

1 hour ago, Raven_Rayes said:

handle risk emundhi indulo.. it was an oversold product.

20rs product ni hype chesi 2000rs ki ammaru... malli 1500rs venakki isthunnaru. distributors still will be at loss.

nuvvu cheppedhi ela undantey... elon musk gaadu sollu cheppi cheppi stock manipulate chestey, no one should intervene annattu undhi..

sure retail investors don't have the power to intervene, but minority stockholders of the company do.. and they will. either legally or extra legally.

Cinema is a product. Nuvvu seppinaaa example is stock which is an ownership issue. You can’t compare both. 
 

Distributors are not owners. Whereas shareholders are. Hence regulatory industry intervenes. Anyways take it easy. Let’s agree to disagree on this. 

[Raven_Rayes]

7 minutes ago, veerigadu said:

Cinema is a product. Nuvvu seppinaaa example is stock which is an ownership issue. You can’t compare both. 
 

Distributors are not owners. Whereas shareholders are. Hence regulatory industry intervenes. Anyways take it easy. Let’s agree to disagree on this. 

there's nothing to disagree. you are obviously wrong.

try and build a business, then you'll understand why producers are giving money back to the distributors.

[Kakynada]

aa chetta Pk gadu started this trend with johnny, he returned some of his remuneration to distributors and allu arvind producer.,, enduku ivvali doesn't make any sense, profits vaste distributors full bank cheskuntaru, cinema dobbithey labo dibo ma Faisal poyayi evadina adukondi ane edupu is very silly. product vere cinema business vere brotheru.... 

[Lovecrusader]

2 minutes ago, Kakynada said:

aa chetta Pk gadu started this trend with johnny, he returned some of his remuneration to distributors and allu arvind producer.,, enduku ivvali doesn't make any sense, profits vaste distributors full bank cheskuntaru, cinema dobbithey labo dibo ma Faisal poyayi evadina adukondi ane edupu is very silly. product vere cinema business vere brotheru.... 

Hits aina cinemalaki kuda profits ravu telsa distributors ki ,recent example RRR

[Kakynada]

4 minutes ago, Lovecrusader said:

Hits aina cinemalaki kuda profits ravu telsa distributors ki ,recent example RRR

depends on agreement, between producer, distributor, theater owners, how many days adidnhi theater lo how many full shows how many eegalu tholing shows, chana factors untayi annoy,

[Original Profile]

5 minutes ago, Kakynada said:

aa chetta Pk gadu started this trend with johnny, he returned some of his remuneration to distributors and allu arvind producer.,, enduku ivvali doesn't make any sense, profits vaste distributors full bank cheskuntaru, cinema dobbithey labo dibo ma Faisal poyayi evadina adukondi ane edupu is very silly. product vere cinema business vere brotheru.... 

PK ni thittadam pakkana pedithey that is true. Valla ishtam tho return isthey that’s fine, it’s up to them. But andarinunchi Ade expect cheyyadam ento. Ila workout Kakapotey return iccheyyali ante best business idey. Oka 4 cinemaalu ilaane egirithey buyers aagipotharu. Demand batte cash chesukuntaru obvious ga

[Kakynada]

2 minutes ago, Original Profile said:

PK ni thittadam pakkana pedithey that is true. Valla ishtam tho return isthey that’s fine, it’s up to them. But andarinunchi Ade expect cheyyadam ento. Ila workout Kakapotey return iccheyyali ante best business idey. Oka 4 cinemaalu ilaane egirithey buyers aagipotharu. Demand batte cash chesukuntaru obvious ga

okadu start chetshey manolu telsindhe kahda, follow ipotharu...thats why pk ki blame in this matter... 

 

[Raven_Rayes]

29 minutes ago, veerigadu said:

Cinema is a product. Nuvvu seppinaaa example is stock which is an ownership issue. You can’t compare both. 
 

Distributors are not owners. Whereas shareholders are. Hence regulatory industry intervenes. Anyways take it easy. Let’s agree to disagree on this. 

power meedha thesis chesnattu pose kodtaav.. but simple market power dynamics kooda intuitive ga catch cheyyaleka pothunnav.

whoever controls the market controls the terms of commercial exchange.

if no one controls the market, then the one with the most persuasive argument who can convince majority players will control the terms of exchange.

if producer can convince the market that he doesn't need to pay back, he doesn't have to. basic stuff bro.

[RedThupaki]

On 9/10/2022 at 12:16 AM, Lovecrusader said:

nijamena idhi @bharathicement @RedThupaki , i dont know , if this is true i take my words back and if this is true chiru could have trusted koratala blindly but cinema flop avagane talk enti chiru fingered too much in taking and tory of the film... and there are counters from other side ...tooo....directors vallane cinemalu flop avthunai aani...blame game happend right for that movie

antey...sirio anniya nenu soosukuntaa...nenu unnaanu serrio unaaadu nuvvu usuko...nee dorection craze undhi...front face la koratala ni petti...backend fingering and story fingering antha anniya chessadu..koratala....anavasaranga business la involve thats his problem...at the same storyy la fingering...bakend la business la fingering ...maa anniya chesi naakem thelvadh antunaaadu ...thats the matter.....both parties mistakes unai...but anniyaa konchem chessadu as usual kadha