Jump to content

Tax contribution and Distribution of funds by individual states of India


Ryzen_renoir

Recommended Posts

Just now, veerigadu said:

Exactly. High populated Countries like China, Mexico and vomerica use less than 15% land for agriculture. They are able to generate good output. In India, we use almost 56% of total land in agriculture. The lack of machinery is an issue. Indian farmers still use ancient agriculture practices. It’s such a waste of time and land cover. 

take best example of israel…

there are different methods of agriculture…depending on the conditions…agriculture,horticulture, aquaculture, vertical farming, hydroponics, aquaponics…etc people need to get some awareness..govt should help in adopting the new methods…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

This year is a bad indication because most of india was closed down for half the period. State incomes took a severe hit during that period 

2018-19 would be a better indicator 

Neeku edhi convenient unte adhe better anu… na matta…

Lavdalo 22-23 kaki lekkalu pattukochhi… TG contribution ledhu ani propaganda create cheyadaniki thread esaav… just 1 year is not an indicator to draw conclusion this way or that way mari… ayina ni source inka verify cheyale…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

take best example of israel…

there are different methods of agriculture…depending on the conditions…agriculture,horticulture, aquaculture, vertical farming, hydroponics, aquaponics…etc people need to get some awareness..govt should help in adopting the new methods…

Agreed. That would be a great start. Instead of providing Raithuuu bandhuuu,  They should provide 80% subsidy in the purchase of agricultural oriented machinery etc. It will pay its dividends and our govt will be able to export more to foreign countries. But it won’t happen. Raithuuu bandhhhuuu is very popular vote bank scheme now. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, veerigadu said:

Agreed. That would be a great start. Instead of providing Raithuuu bandhuuu,  They should provide 80% subsidy in the purchase of agricultural oriented machinery etc. It will pay its dividends and our govt will be able to export more to foreign countries. But it won’t happen. Raithuuu bandhhhuuu is very popular vote bank scheme now. 

agree…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

agree…

Democracy has its own shortcomings.
 

Statesmen constantly seek for short term public acceptance. In the process, long term prospects for growth is often neglected.
 

It’s a sad state of affairs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ryzen_renoir said:

Self proclaimed rich state Telangana is actually not that rich , doesn't really contribute anywhere near Karnataka or maharastra 

In fact it is much closer to south Bihar AP

 

 

17 minutes ago, reality said:

Neeku edhi convenient unte adhe better anu… na matta…

Lavdalo 22-23 kaki lekkalu pattukochhi… TG contribution ledhu ani propaganda create cheyadaniki thread esaav… just 1 year is not an indicator to draw conclusion this way or that way mari… ayina ni source inka verify cheyale…

 

5 minutes ago, reality said:

7a1fjq.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, veerigadu said:

It’s same trend both in India and vomerica. Deeply land locked states such as Bihar, Jharkand and Uttar Pradesh have least development. Just like Oklahoma, Kansas and other red states here in vomericaaa. Scum baggage. 

It’s nothing to do with land locked ness of these states. They lost their prosperity to other states. If anything has to be blamed then it’s the Union Govt. UP, Rajasthan, Bihar, Jharkhand and Bengal together supply more than 50% of the mines and minerals. If these states start charging royalty then states like Maharastra, Tamil Nadu will be left behind. For other states prosperity, these states have become poor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

If anything has to be blamed then it’s the Union Govt.

adhe le…. aa beggar states maku overwhelming funds ivvalani emi adagatledhu le… UP sweep chesinodidhe… center power… its obvious…. UP inko 4 parts ga divide ayyi, kinchem janalu brain tho forward thinking start chesthe…. ilanti situation undadhu…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, reality said:

adhe le…. aa beggar states maku overwhelming funds ivvalani emi adagatledhu le… UP sweep chesinodidhe… center power… its obvious…. UP inko 4 parts ga divide ayyi, kinchem janalu brain tho forward thinking start chesthe…. ilanti situation undadhu…

Ok, my opinion has nothing to with politics or politicians. Your point focuses on future part but my observation was on what happened in the past and how the Union arrangement did not help but miserably  failed these states collectively ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, reality said:

Abba chaa… konchem extra ayyindhi….Funds anni corrupt CMs thintunnara?

Funds ? Corrupt states and CM’s tintunara ? Mineral rich states do not have control on their minerals. Jharkhand has India’s highest tribal population who should have maximum access to the funds yet they don’t have a day in their mineral wealth, Which CM do you want to blame ? 
 

Jharkhand lanti states nundi Iron ore and coal tho other states prosper avutunte, This states is struggling to mop up funds. progress. Endukantav ? What if Jharkhand starts supplying coal and iron ore to Maharastra, what would happen to light industrial state ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

It’s nothing to do with land locked ness of these states. They lost their prosperity to other states. If anything has to be blamed then it’s the Union Govt. UP, Rajasthan, Bihar, Jharkhand and Bengal together supply more than 50% of the mines and minerals. If these states start charging royalty then states like Maharastra, Tamil Nadu will be left behind. For other states prosperity, these states have become poor.

It’s a very arbitrary statement. Is central govt involved in the leasing of those mines currently? I thought it comes under state govt purview. 

Anyways, I’m also assuming that it’s a private enterprise that has licenses for mining in those states. Why aren’t they charging royalty from those owners? Is it a willful act of endearment to increase profits for the leasing partner. 
 

One way or the other, they can’t let this slide. Its sad if they don’t want to do it. 
 

I also won’t be surprised if most of the material is exported rather than being utilized for domestic needs. I don’t think there is any law that regulates their greed for more profits. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...