Jump to content

2014 lo Amaravathi capital enduku pettaru. genuine disco


veerigadu

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, anna_gari_maata said:

Two cities is not entire state... for a place to be a capital that place should address all groups and stakeholders. 

Guntur is pretty good in handling this because a lot of groups have investment in that place. Amaravati is too close to Bezawada and a single group

Amaravathi is a group of villages uncle....it starting from Tulluru/undavalli (which is closer to Vjw) and end at tadikonda (which is closer to guntur)...even say if its closer to vjw...it should be the place to pick as the lands are cheap and can take advantage of the near by city instead of building everything from scratch.....why do you think places like mokila etc are booming...bcoz the land is cheap and easy access to Gachibowli and hitech city

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, veerigadu said:

Agreed. They failed to suggest a specific location. That was very incompetent on their behalf 

thats what I am saying...vadu teliviga pros and cons seppi vurukunnadu...say if I do the same with you...its up to you to take the decision...nuvvu ee decision teskunna I can opposite referring the pros and cons

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vij  and guntur is best place for capital TDP koda political gain for money moved it to Amaravati any way it got lot of agri lands also available present  guntur or vij land ekkada vunnadi vunna chala expensive lot of people from guntur and vij send money to TRS to flight for seperation of TG so they know they land prices will go high talk vunnadi eppudu 2010 to 12 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • It is justified to give sop for Andhra Pradesh to help the state in economic deficit.
  • SDC should be approached soon to grant special sop to Andhra Pradesh The area between Vijayawada-Guntur may impose threat for the economy to the state, apart from creating environmental degradation
  • Rs 1536cr required for the provision of basic amenities in the capital region The ring road near VGTM may increase the land rates beyond limit, apart from a heavy threat imposed to fertile lands.
  • There is no mandatory rule the High Court should be located at the same place where there are assembly and secretariat. Committee reminded of the fact that many states have such a situation in this milieu.
  • High court should be established in Visakhapatnam and a special bench for Rayalaseema should also be established
  • Rajbhavan needs 15 acres land Assembly Bhavan needs 80-100 acres land Suggested for the establishment of CM, Ministers, Offices, Secreteriart near VGTM.
  • All these need 20 acres land Near VGTM only 1,458 acres land is available while the capital needs 10,00 acres.
  • Land acquisition will take 3-4yrs and the land acquisition on the present market rates is a costly affair. The land rates have been increased at Vijayawada & Guntur. Capital and development should be decentralised.
  • Nuzvid, Musunur, Amaravtahi, Pulichintala can be utilised for few government offices. There should be a definite strategy for equal development of all districts The backward areas should be developed with basic amenities and educational institutions. Government offices should be distributed in all 13 districts. The domestic and foreign investments should be development oriented. The quarters for the staff of various departments should be scattered at many places. All IT related industries should be established in Visakhapatnam. CMO and Secretariat can be established at Nuzivid, Gannavaram, Musunur.


https://www.thehansindia.com/posts/index/Andhra-Pradesh/2014-09-04/Sivaramakrishnan-committee-report-Full-Text/106416

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, idibezwada said:

Amaravathi is a group of villages uncle....it starting from Tulluru/undavalli (which is closer to Vjw) and end at tadikonda (which is closer to guntur)...even say if its closer to vjw...it should be the place to pick as the lands are cheap and can take advantage of the near by city instead of building everything from scratch.....why do you think places like mokila etc are booming...bcoz the land is cheap and easy access to Gachibowli and hitech city

Building a city to make money is different from building a city to run a state ... already unna city ni develop cheyyataniki ide main reason, there is good amount of infrastructure to kick-start the state. Every other state, country has did the same...manaki em poyye kaalam. It could have saved lot of money too, lands cheap ga vaste emundi building costly kada. How much sand kabja happened all these years ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, anna_gari_maata said:

1. KCR hit right at the core of pride of Andhra people so there was feeling to build a city from scratch

2. Vizag is not a capital material even now and is already facing ton of traffic issues..... it's atmost a luxury place and very close to Orissa than the rest of the state. Vijaywada and surroundings is the best suited place for AP capital

3. Kurnool is too close to Telangana and too far from Uttarandhra. also it's a very small city

 

 

Coming to Cons :

1. Amaravati sounds like Atlantis, El Dorado ... a city that exists in dreams

2. Used agricultural lands which are the crux of AP livelihood

3. CBN ignored all his election promises of developing the other districts, instead he made Amaravati a financial burden for everyone

4. Amaravati development was pure scam and nothing else. Guntur should have been made the capital instead

 

how is this made a burden to everyone....he tried to spend on the infra and started selling land which now belongs to gov for premium price....RBI and some hotels brought at 3-6 Cr...who would get the land at that premium price if there is no infra?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, anna_gari_maata said:

Building a city to make money is different from building to run a state ... already unna city ni develop cheyyataniki ide main reason, there is good amount of infrastructure to kick-start the state. It could have saved lot of money too, lands cheap ga vaste emundi building costly kada. How much sand kabja happened all these years ? 

uncle....you are missing the logic...buildings costly ante ippudu vjw or vizag or gunturni cheste hyd nunchi move aina employees road meeda kusoni pani chestara? gov should still buy a land or build in gov land....instead if they build the same in a cheaper place, the prime land in city can generate money

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, anna_gari_maata said:

1. KCR hit right at the core of pride of Andhra people so there was feeling to build a city from scratch

2. Vizag is not a capital material even now and is already facing ton of traffic issues..... it's atmost a luxury place and very close to Orissa than the rest of the state. Vijaywada and surroundings is the best suited place for AP capital

3. Kurnool is too close to Telangana and too far from Uttarandhra. also it's a very small city

 

 

Coming to Cons :

1. Amaravati sounds like Atlantis, El Dorado ... a city that exists in dreams

2. Used agricultural lands which are the crux of AP livelihood

3. CBN ignored all his election promises of developing the other districts, instead he made Amaravati a financial burden for everyone

4. Amaravati development was pure scam and nothing else. Guntur should have been made the capital instead

 

Why this lie of ignored other districts?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, idibezwada said:

how is this made a burden to everyone....he tried to spend on the infra and started selling land which now belongs to gov for premium price....RBI and some hotels brought at 3-6 Cr...who would get the land at that premium price if there is no infra?

simple logic .... unnecesary infra 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, idibezwada said:

uncle....you are missing the logic...buildings costly ante ippudu vjw or vizag or gunturni cheste hyd nunchi move aina employees road meeda kusoni pani chestara? gov should still buy a land or build in gov land....instead if its built the same in a cheaper place, the prime land in city can generate money

Can't a city accomodate new incoming people ? Govt antha powerless untada ... even to buy a few good buildings in city

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, idibezwada said:

ee baised refs deniki uncle...unte direct aa report link veyyi...did capital region get any floods in the last 100-150 years...and more over this is the best region for capital ani cheppakunda enta report iste emlabam

Flat plains with river bank, Delta estuary and a fragile eco system…ie reasons saripova not to build a city here ani ? Sri Krishna Commission emi avasaram ledu ie vishayam chepanika….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, anna_gari_maata said:

Can't a city accomodate new incoming people ? 

how?...if you living in your home...will you be able to accommodate my family if every room is allocated to something? In combined state there are many gov departments who are in hyd got moved now....go check out...all vjw surrounding are fill with these office in rented premises starting from Kanuru, gollapudi and tadepalli

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...