You do Khalistani appeasement politics.....and this is what you get....

[kevinUsa]

[kevinUsa]

Canada’s top politician Jagmeet Singh under the radar of Indian Intelligence officials for his Pro-Khalistani and Pro-Pakistan propaganda: Reports

 

 

[kevinUsa]

The controversial Canadian lawmaker Jagmeet Singh is under the radar of Indian Intelligence agencies for not only sheltering pro-Khalistani sympathisers in Canada but also for leading an anti-Indian movement more vociferously in the Americas, especially after the abrogation of Article 370, reports Outlook.

According to the latest dossier prepared by the Indian intelligence officials, Jagmeet Singh, the Leader of Canada’s second-largest party, remains a ”pro-Khalistani and a pro-Pakistani” ringleader in the country despite his deep Punjabi roots.

On a specific report of India’s external intelligence agency Research and Analysis Wing, Singh was denied a visa in 2013 for his anti-Indian stance. The RAW has revealed in one its report that Singh had been funding Khalistani outfits, operating from Pakistan. He is also connected with prominent Khalistani and Kashmiri separatist groups based in different countries of Europe.

Latest reports also suggest that Jagmeet Singh is also trying to bring Khalistani and Kashmiri separatists under one umbrella in Canada. Recently he held a meeting in this connection at his residence in Ontario.

Who is Jagmeet Singh?

Jagmeet Singh, also known as Jimmy Dhaliwal, was born in 1979 to immigrant Indian parents in Canada. A lawyer-turned-politician, Singh is currently serving as leader of the New Democratic Party (NDP) since 2017 and as a Member of Parliament since 2019.

However, Jagdeep Singh is known for his support for Khalistani terrorists and has openly voiced his support for the anti-Indian Khalistanis in Canada, earning him the tag of being ‘Pro-Khalistan’.

In 2014, the Indian government had denied Singh a visa to visit India for criticising human rights record of India. Denying him a visa, the Indian government had accused him of misusing the human rights cause to pursue his “insidious agenda of disturbing the social fabric of India and undermining the peace, harmony and territorial integrity of India”. He also became the first western legislator ever to be denied entry into the country.

Also Read- Shifting focus: Is the Khalistan movement really ‘Justice for Sikhs’?

In June of 2015, Singh, who was then just an NDP member of the Ontario legislature, appeared on stage at a Khalistan rally in San Francisco which had featured a large poster of Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale, the Khalistani terrorist, who led an armed movement against India and had occupied the Golden Temple.

In 2016, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh had participated in a pro-Khalistani seminar and had even endorsed the use of political violence as a “legitimate form of resistance” to achieve an independent Sikh homeland in India.

Shockingly, in his speech, Singh had even accused India of committing “genocide” against Sikhs in the Golden Temple assault. In April 2017, Jagmeet Singh was also responsible for passing a motion recognizing the 1984 Sikh riots in India as a “genocide”.

The anti-India propaganda of Jagmeet Singh does not end just there. Following the abrogation of Article 370 by the Narendra Modi government, Singh had even expressed his support to pro-Pakistan propaganda on Kashmir. He had made public statements against India and accused the country of human rights violations in the region.

“I want the people of Kashmir to know that I stand with you, I stand against the injustices happening, and I denounce what India is doing to the people of Kashmir,” he had told the media.

Reportedly, many Canadians of Indian origin have now begun questioning NDP leader on his proximity to sympathisers of slain terror kingpin Talwinder Singh Parmar, the prime suspect in Kanishka (Air India) bombing. Parmar, the Khalistani terrorist who led the Babbar Khalsa outfit still has many followers in Canada, allegedly having close ties with Singh.

Shockingly, left-liberals in India find these pro-Khalistani sympathisers as a source of inspiration. Just two days earlier, Gurmehar Kaur, the poster girl of Indian liberals who shot to fame during Ramjas violence had created a controversy after she had showered praises on controversial Canadian lawmaker – Jagmeet Singh.

[kevinUsa]

Jagmeet Singh’s comments on Khalistan risk undermining Canada’s Indo-Pacific strategy

 

 

[futureofandhra]

15 minutes ago, Spartan said:

Ah Rahul gadi valana pushpams show running 

[kevinUsa]

When Jagmeet Singh took over as leader of the NDP, he seemed like just the tonic the party needed – young, hip, multicultural, completely Canadian but with a dashing touch. Those turbans! That beard! He was just the kind of figure to make progressive folks feel good about themselves, their party and their prospects. GQ, the men’s fashion magazine, profiled him in rapturous terms, calling him “the incredibly well-dressed rising star in Canadian politics.”

Not many people outside the Sikh community thought too much about the other side –the side that is deeply invested in old grievances and diaspora politics. When the CBC’s Terry Milewski pressed him hard on his views of the 1985 Air India bombing – the worst terrorist attack in Canadian history – Mr. Singh refused to blame the bombing on Sikh extremists. “I don’t know who was responsible,” he said. Mr. Milewski was accused by some of a touch of racism for even raising the matter. No unturbanned politician would have had to endure such a grilling, the critics charged.

But Mr. Milewski was right to ask. This week, reports in The Globe gave details of Mr. Singh’s appearances at two different events promoting Sikh separatism. At one of them, he talked as if India were his own homeland. In a speech he gave there, he accused India of “genocide,” and described it as something that happened to “us.” His use of the first person was striking. He described India as “our country where we live” – a startling use of language for a born-and-bred Canadian politician.

The diaspora politics of the Sikh community are obscure to most of us. To some, the old wounds feel as fresh as yesterday. That’s certainly the case for Mr. Singh. The “genocide” he cites is the massacre of about 3,000 Sikhs during three days in 1984, in the aftermath of the assassination of Indira Gandhi by two Sikh bodyguards. In an emotional article published Thursday in The Globe, he explained that the terrible persecution of the Sikhs inspired him to stand up for human rights. He likened Indian violence against Sikhs to the pain and trauma inflicted by the residential schools – trauma that endures for generations.

What Mr. Singh didn’t say is that the violence cut both ways. Also in the 1980s, violent Sikh fundamentalists in Punjab sought to form an independent theocratic state called Khalistan. As Canadian writer Gaurav Singhmar notes, that fundamentalist movement “was largely an export from radical Sikh populations in the U.K. and Canada.” It was Sikh militants who blew up Air India Flight 182, killing 329 people – a fact that Mr. Singh had been extremely reluctant to acknowledge until his Globe opinion piece.

The Khalistan movement is largely dead in Punjab. And most Canadian Sikhs want nothing to do with the extremists. But as Ujjal Dosanjh, the former premier of British Columbia explained on the CBC, “it continues to find traction here, due to politicians of all hues playing footsie with Khalistan sympathizers.”

All of this should be deeply troubling, not just to the party Mr. Singh now leads but also to the rest of us. A man who wants to be prime minister is up to his neck in the ethno-nationalist politics of another country and another time and place. He is deeply sympathetic to the more militant wing of his own ethnic community. He is heavily indebted – some say overly indebted – to the Sikh ethnic vote for his job. One reason he won the leadership was that he managed to sign up more than 10,000 B.C. Sikhs as new party members. ”My concern is too many Sikhs have signed up as NDP members because of Singh’s Punjabi identity and because he’s a baptized Sikh,” radio host Harjit Singh Gill told the Vancouver Sun’s Douglas Todd.

You’ve got to wonder how thoroughly Mr. Singh was vetted for his job. Did his beard and bespoke suits bedazzle people into skipping the tough questions? Did anybody worry how the divided politics of the Sikh community would spill over into federal politics? Did anybody worry about the consequences of such a major shift to voting-bloc politics? Or were those questions considered too rude to ask?

All three parties have played footsie with Sikh separatists, of course. Justin Trudeau got in trouble in India because one of them got in the door at a reception. But the role of ethnic politics in Canada needs to shrink, not grow. One of the greatest challenges to multiculturalism is the nurturing of grievances and hatreds imported from afar. We need leaders who will make it clear we won’t tolerate that – not leaders who fan the flames.

[kevinUsa]

Jagmeet Singh (Canada, NDP) - March for Freedom - San Francisco 2015

[Spartan]

Just now, futureofandhra said:

Ah Rahul gadi valana pushpams show running 

emanna ante CBn antav leda center antav.....

there has been uptick of khalistanis only after AAP came in,because they promised soft corner for them during elections..

antak mundu congress aina akali dal aina...tokki pettaru vallani because of nations security....

kachra Kejri gadu vachi a equations marustunnadu./chesadu...

 

[kevinUsa]

Jagmeet Singh (Canada, NDP) - March for Freedom - San Francisco 2015

 

[kevinUsa]

 

[Android_Halwa]

We could control the Khalsa 1.0 and could successfully disintegrate their finance arms and other bodies and a political solution.

But resurgent Khalsa, We will not be able to control them anymore like we did previously. They are more empowered financially and they are all based out of India and started to operate in India. Farm Laws stir apudu vellu vella satha endo supichinaru…Remote control tho nadipistunaru….

This is the primary reason why I felt AAP is too bad for Punjab. 

[kevinUsa]

8 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

We could control the Khalsa 1.0 and could successfully disintegrate their finance arms and other bodies and a political solution.

But resurgent Khalsa, We will not be able to control them anymore like we did previously. They are more empowered financially and they are all based out of India and started to operate in India. Farm Laws stir apudu vellu vella satha endo supichinaru…Remote control tho nadipistunaru….

This is the primary reason why I felt AAP is too bad for Punjab. 

aa remote canada and california lo undi 

surrey  BC, 

brampton ON,

North Calgary AB

mottam velle....

aaa quebec lo try chesaru kani akkada italian mob mundu vellu paniki raru...

memu live lo chustam kabatti evi anni telusu..

 evarikanna time unte tiktok life open chesi khalistan ani kottu oka live eppudu nadustuntadi...

@Spartan

[Android_Halwa]

Just now, kevinUsa said:

aa remote canada and california lo undi 

USA, Canada, UK, Australia….major funding sources of resurgent Khalsa.

They control major businesses, billions of dollars of revenues, supply chain and logistics and massive properties. Funding is no big deal now. If another Bindranwale raises now, it’s very hard to control them. 

[kevinUsa]

 recently BC cherry hill plaza incident

brampton college plaza incident...

 

[kevinUsa]

2 minutes ago, Android_Halwa said:

USA, Canada, UK, Australia….major funding sources of resurgent Khalsa.

They control major businesses, billions of dollars of revenues, supply chain and logistics and massive properties. Funding is no big deal now. If another Bindranwale raises now, it’s very hard to control them. 

appudu indira gandhi eppudu shah gadu 

ham bomb laga denge  adi ayindo anuko mottam flight ekki canada us aus nz eu mottam asylum apply chestaru asalu vellaki passport ivvakunda unte set