Jump to content

who ruled bhagyanagaram before razakars


futureofandhra

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, futureofandhra said:

It can be but what is the area name for example warangal orugallu type 

hyderabad didnt get name until Bhagyanagar and Charminar @futureofandhra 

everything was GollaKonda samsthanam

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, csrcsr said:

Ipudu emi petrol posi cbn ni titistav anna

cbn ni taluchukuney batch ki teliyali anna

my post is to know the telugu areas history 

cbn meedha edchey gang ki teliyali valla plans ento

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, futureofandhra said:

ah pranthanni emani pilicheyvallu before qutub shahis?

 

sixteen Mahajanapadas:

  1. The Buddhist Anguttara Nikaya, at several places,[15] gives a list of sixteen great nations:

 

Aśmaka

The country of Assaka or the Ashmaka tribe was located in Dakshinapatha or southern India. It included areas in present-day Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and Maharashtra.[21] In Gautama Buddha's time, many of the Assakas were located on the banks of the Godavari River (south of the Vindhya mountains). The capital of the Assakas was Potana or Potali, which corresponds present-day Bodhan in Telangana and Paudanya of Mahabharata.[22] In Maharashtra its capital is located in Potali which corresponds to present day Nandura, Buldhana district. The Ashmakas are also mentioned by Pāṇini. They are placed in the north-west in the Markendeya Purana and the Brhat Samhita. The river Godavari separated the country of the Assakas from that of the Mulakas (or Alakas). The country of Assaka lay outside the pale of Madhyadesa. It was located on a southern high road, the Dakshinapatha. At one time, Assaka included Mulaka and abutted Avanti.[23]

 

 

year 600 BCE

Ancient_india.png

 

 

year 500 BCE

Mahajanapadas_(c._500_BCE).png

 

Magadha_Expansion_1.gif

India_in_50_bc.jpg

 

1920px-Map_of_the_Satavahanas.png

1280px-Joppen_1907_India_in_the_2nd_Cent

1238px-South_Asia_historical_AD375_EN.sv

1920px-Indian_Kanauj_triangle_map.svg.pn

1920px-Map_of_the_Delhi_Sultanate.png

1920px-Map_of_the_Khalji_Sultanate.png

 

 

 

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, futureofandhra said:

 

Tg batch anipincharu Anna lol 🤣

Nakem telsu anna wiki cheppindhi vesa

The area was ruled by the Kalyani branch of the Chalukyakings. When the Chalukya kingdom became weaker, Kakatiyas, who were feudal chieftains of Chalukya, declared independence and set up their kingdom around Warangal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, nuvvu_naakina_paalem said:

arey ara gorre burra

 

razakars are police of nizam

nizam was the ruler

 

sarigga question adagatam nerchuko first

Ara Gorre Burra..!!! Lol….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, nuvvu_naakina_paalem said:

arey ara gorre burra

 

razakars are police of nizam

nizam was the ruler

 

sarigga question adagatam nerchuko first

lol 

neeku burra kooda ledhu ani balayya dp thoney understood

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, TOM_BHAYYA said:

Nakem telsu anna wiki cheppindhi vesa

The area was ruled by the Kalyani branch of the Chalukyakings. When the Chalukya kingdom became weaker, Kakatiyas, who were feudal chieftains of Chalukya, declared independence and set up their kingdom around Warangal.

sorry anna chalukya ki chanakya ki difference meeku telidhu anukunna

karudu kattina jaffa vi kabatti avesam lo type chesav anna 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, futureofandhra said:

sorry anna chalukya ki chanakya ki difference meeku telidhu anukunna

karudu kattina jaffa vi kabatti avesam lo type chesav anna 

Ohh damn .. aina chanakya chalukya nunde ochindhanukunna anna appudu ippudu valle ruling ani

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, nanik said:

After Kakatiyas, Musunuri Nayaks united all Andhra and telangana and ruled from warangal, all Generals supported them claiming kakatiya inheritance.  Rachakonda Nayaks took help from bahamani sultans and defeated musunuri nayaks, after some time bahamani sultans absorbed Telangana into their kingdom. and muslims ruled till Independence..

Our History people are so great, they didnt want to mention musnuri nayaks, as they successfully rebelled against muslims, one of the first in the country where muslims are ousted..

If Andhra and Telangana were united in the past, why did Nizams only rule Telangana and not Andhra?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...