who ruled bhagyanagaram before razakars

[DummyVariable]

1 minute ago, JaiBalayyaaa said:

If Andhra and Telangana were united in the past, why did Nizams only rule Telangana and not Andhra?

They did rule parts of it briefly before selling it to the British. 

[JaiBalayyaaa]

1 minute ago, DummyVariable said:

They did rule parts of it briefly before selling it to the British. 

But who ruled Andhra before the British? 

[DummyVariable]

1 hour ago, nuvvu_naakina_paalem said:

arey ara gorre burra

 

razakars are police of nizam

nizam was the ruler

 

sarigga question adagatam nerchuko first

He intentionally called them Razakkars. 

[DummyVariable]

2 minutes ago, JaiBalayyaaa said:

But who ruled Andhra before the British? 

[JaiBalayyaaa]

1 minute ago, DummyVariable said:

Based on this, Nizams ruled Costa and Rayalaseema, but why no Urdu influence?

[Paamu]

3 hours ago, nanik said:

hyderabad ledu, But Golla KOnda undi, akkada fort katteru kakateeya time lo.. ade ippudu Golconda..

Oh nenu inka Golkonda built by nizams anukunna .. a area choosi. Golla Konda -- Gollollu kattinaru or something related to him ?

[DummyVariable]

1 minute ago, JaiBalayyaaa said:

Based on this, Nizams ruled Costa and Rayalaseema, but why no Urdu influence?

It was for a brief period of time before the British took over and wiped Urdu out of the sylllabus. The British also administered Andhras and Aravas as one state. There was more exchange between them than with Hyderabad state. Madras state were ruled very differently. 

[nanik]

2 hours ago, Baddambalraju said:

After Kakatiya kingdom collapsed, Padmanayaka’s aka Velama Dora’s ruled from Devarakonda as the Capital 

After Kakatiya collapsed, Musunuri Nayak's ruled whole Andhra and Telangana. Their sub ordinates are Recherla Velama and Kondaveeti Reddy kingdom. Both Vijayanagar kingdom and musunuri nayaks both fought Bahamani muslim kings and cooperated. Bhamani fully concentrated on Musunuri nayaks, and with help from Recherla Nayaks they defeated them, and Vijayanagar survived from these assaults..Part of Musunuri Nayaks family migrated to Vijayanagar kingdom under Pemmasani Nayaks and ruled last telugu kingdom which is Gandikota in Kadapa..Just because musunri nayaks are kamma, our historians ignored them.

 

[nanik]

26 minutes ago, JaiBalayyaaa said:

If Andhra and Telangana were united in the past, why did Nizams only rule Telangana and not Andhra?

After Musuni Nayaks dynasty ended, Telangana ruled by Recherla Nayaks which was absorbed by Bahamani KIngs.. Coastal andhra came under Gajapathi Orissa and part under Kondavidu Reddy kings.. From that point, Muslims established their footprint in Telangana, and untill end of vijayanagar, rest of andhra was under their control..Nizams ruled very breifly coastal and rayalseema untill they gave these areas to british.

[JackSeal]

4 hours ago, futureofandhra said:

@Telugodura456 @Mancode  @dasari4kntr

evaru paripalincharu kakathiyula?

Razakars never ruled hyderabad or telangana. 

[JackSeal]

3 hours ago, futureofandhra said:

History motham sanka nakincharu who ever it  is in education system

Motham Akbar Babar aurangajeb humayun 

Gurinchey history books lo pettaru

Not sure how it is now 

Yeah just like andhra history and potti sriramulu ne telangana valla pai rudhi nattu. 

History books lo two parts untai one ancient and other modern history. School lo history sakkaga sadvaledha ?

[ticket]

15 minutes ago, JackSeal said:

Yeah just like andhra history and potti sriramulu ne telangana valla pai rudhi nattu. 

History books lo two parts untai one ancient and other modern history. School lo history sakkaga sadvaledha ?

Ekkada ruddaro.. Year and class gurinchi kuda chepte  telusukuntam.. 

[nanik]

23 minutes ago, JackSeal said:

Yeah just like andhra history and potti sriramulu ne telangana valla pai rudhi nattu. 

History books lo two parts untai one ancient and other modern history. School lo history sakkaga sadvaledha ?

bhayya, kakatiyas kuda andhra nunchi vacheru.. valla inscriptions lo clear ga durjaya vamsam ani raseru..and all queens came from Krishna/Guntur areas.. at that time this difference of telangana and andhra is not there..warangal is called as andhra nagaram. 

also, during Telanagana sayudha poratam, krishna and godavari areas are used as shelter zones by communists..lot of andhra people from villages participated in the rebellion and died.. just because mukkodu told u otherwise, do not believe it.. more over most telugu people do not know their family history where they migrated from..

[ticket]

1 hour ago, nanik said:

bhayya, kakatiyas kuda andhra nunchi vacheru.. valla inscriptions lo clear ga durjaya vamsam ani raseru..and all queens came from Krishna/Guntur areas.. at that time this difference of telangana and andhra is not there..warangal is called as andhra nagaram. 

also, during Telanagana sayudha poratam, krishna and godavari areas are used as shelter zones by communists..lot of andhra people from villages participated in the rebellion and died.. just because mukkodu told u otherwise, do not believe it.. more over most telugu people do not know their family history where they migrated from..

Baga pettav grass..

Also Telangana rebellion meetings were called andra maha sabha.. 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andhra_Mahasabha

[reality]

3 hours ago, JaiBalayyaaa said:

If Andhra and Telangana were united in the past, why did Nizams only rule Telangana and not Andhra?

There was no such delineation as Andhra or Telangana during the time of ancient kingdoms. It seems like, evadi hawa entha sagithe vadi kingdom boundaries antha undevi… Likeminded kingdoms alliance undevi… and so people used to share their common interests and hardships, and cooperate with each other (don’t confuse this with the modern day Samaikyandhra argument).

But extended nizam rule of Hyderabad region (current Telangana) and extended British rule of Madras state (current Andhra) brought huge cultural and development disparities between the regions. Telangana region had to endure rajakar bastards towards the end of nizam rule and got its freedom one year after India did. While the region was in the repair mode from 1948 - 1956, has its own CM etc… during which a completely different territory (like said above, culture and development disparities) called Andhra state (which itself got detached from Madras state in 1953) was proposed and lobbied to be merged with Hyderabad state in the guise of state partition on the basis of language (what a foolish measure!).

Then Telangana politicians succumbed… by trusting the various agreements and protections offered to people of Hyderabad region, Mulki rules (gentleman’s agreement etc)… Telugu state formed in 1956 and all those protections were put in trash… slowly command changed… injustice and unfairness continued by ruling CMs. 1969 TG separation fight… 610 GO failure… still injustice continued. Finally Telangana formed in 2014.