Jump to content

Exposing the Truth Behind 781,000 Applications and 408,000 Frauds


cameraman

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, viky said:

agree uncle, itserve reference thone tidtuna, 

@Spartan 

csr anna GC otchina tarvtha meliga maripoyindu choosinava, nothing to do with him anta. ITserve toni, chetulu kalpindu

ps: csr anna just kidding.

Bro he is bad guy ane antuna but context is withreference to this year h1b fraud 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, cameraman said:

he answered this question as well

According to him USCIS may not  give another chance to people who missed it this year (even if they are left over visas  in the 85k limit). They are more worried about dealing with fraud guys first and correcting system. 

That's too late bro karma 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JavaBava said:

If multiple companies file h1 for the same candidate they cnt do anything and its legal to do so. 
 

The issue is for companies trying to fake that they are not related but having the operating address as the same. Or same owners. Or had same address previously but changed to diff address not to get caught. Thats what the fraud is. No where did uscis mention about fraud by candidates. This rahul baba is just faking it

candidates are considered as victims here, they might just revoke, but mestiries did the fraud ani ostadhi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JavaBava said:

If multiple companies file h1 for the same candidate they cnt do anything and its legal to do so. 
 

The issue is for companies trying to fake that they are not related but having the operating address as the same. Or same owners. Or had same address previously but changed to diff address not to get caught. Thats what the fraud is. No where did uscis mention about fraud by candidates. This rahul baba is just faking it

consultancies are applying multiple applications with no actual legit job offer, they are using their sister companies for same candidates. 

Candidates are considered as fraud as they are supporting and cooperating with such employers on this.

 

If legit companies like Apple. Google or some reputed companies apply for same dude then that is a diff valid case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fraud is on the companies. There is no way for the candidate to know if the job is fake or not if you think about it frankly. Someone offered you a job and they are filing for h1. Candidate is not responsible to verify the job location. Fraud is by companies. Rahul baba is talking BS to create panic

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, JavaBava said:

They have to get rid of that rule first. 2 companies cannot apply for the same candidate. But companies have no way to know that. They can argue on that basis. 

this will also be a problem kada if a smart masters guy got full time job into salesforce and microsft anukukundam , he can apply for both kada its chicken egge problem 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, JavaBava said:

The fraud is on the companies. There is no way for the candidate to know if the job is fake or not if you think about it frankly. Someone offered you a job and they are filing for h1. Candidate is not responsible to verify the job location. Fraud is by companies. Rahul baba is talking BS to create panic

exactly mestris mistake avutadhi

ee rahul creating panic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, csrcsr said:

It's nothing to do with him anni news articles lo vachindi ,he might have represented itserve earlier the whole point of discussion now is on the recent year lottery

https://www.washingtonpost.comolitics/2023/04/28/immigration-tech-visa-h1b-fraud/9a2c607a-e5d4-11ed-9696-8e874fd710b8_story.html

Some applicants may convince different, independently-owned companies to sponsor them in the lottery, which is perfectly legal. 
 

what does this means?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cameraman said:

One of my friend got from india got H1 approval last year trough a consultancy , they used  WITCH company letter as a client letter. Some how stamping done successfully . He is scared to come to the US now with all this news.   

Sodhi Idhi Antha .. unless client ki call or email chesthe kani teledu .. with uscis being under staffed, valla ki Antha bomma ledu 3yrs venakki poyi ah petitions ni malli check cheyataniki 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Guest said:

Some applicants may convince different, independently-owned companies to sponsor them in the lottery, which is perfectly legal. 
 

what does this means?

different independently owned companies meaning the companies have no relation like fb , microsft anuko 

what some guys are doing is two companies valave untayi one behaves as client to other or two companies tho register chestaru h1b 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Guest said:

Some applicants may convince different, independently-owned companies to sponsor them in the lottery, which is perfectly legal. 
 

what does this means?

Consultancy-a and consultancy-b idharu candidate-xyz ki h1b file chestaru .. which is legal .. kani issue is, if a & b file h1b for xyz candidate with same client-1234 .. which will be a violation .. adi counts as duplication 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, JavaBava said:

The fraud is on the companies. There is no way for the candidate to know if the job is fake or not if you think about it frankly. Someone offered you a job and they are filing for h1. Candidate is not responsible to verify the job location. Fraud is by companies. Rahul baba is talking BS to create panic

Same client letter petti more than 1-company same candidate ki file cheyakidadu .. adi illegal .. okallu in-house petti inkollu client-xyz pedithe no issues, or both different clients Pettina no issue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, JavaBava said:

They have to get rid of that rule first. 2 companies cannot apply for the same candidate. But companies have no way to know that. They can argue on that basis. 

H1b anedi future employment ki .. google Microsoft Amazon all 3 can file h1b for candidate-a .. that is not at all wrong .. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...