Opposition Boycott to Parliament inaugration.... lol kulli sastunnaru ga ...

[Thokkalee]

6 minutes ago, ZoomNaidu said:

Power lo unnappudu lenappudu Modi meedha yedavatam maathram common 😃😃 - that’s the prbm. 

When was modi not in power? Replace modi with Jagan or kcr.. you see the same behavior from the opposition and the ruling party.. 

Believe it or not.. we are more like tribals now.. 

[ZoomNaidu]

18 minutes ago, Thokkalee said:

When was modi not in power? Replace modi with Jagan or kcr.. you see the same behavior from the opposition and the ruling party.. 

Believe it or not.. we are more like tribals now.. 

before Modi is PM, appudu kuda Modi meedha yedusthaaney vunnaaru. 
 

agreed on ur theory though ..

[psycopk]

5 hours ago, Spartan said:

if you dont want to attend....they why even contest and represent the people...

you cant fight for peoples issues by shunning the parliament sessions...

suckers....

As many as 19 opposition parties, including the Congress, Left, TMC, SP and AAP, came together and announced their decision to boycott the inauguration of the new Parliament building by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, saying they find no value in a new building

Aa bokko building lo inka enni ghoralu chestaro labour yedavalu… 

[ZoomNaidu]

 

 

[Spartan]

  media lo opposition ni mingite...

inko kotta contro modalpettindu ninna Jairam Ramesh...

Sengol was never given..avanni fake stories...that Britishers gave it to Nehru during 1947 take over ani...

 

ninna Kishan Reddy and Amit Shah..Times magazine news article proof vesaru 1947 di....

 

[Spartan]

All the contros..

 

The dispute surrounding Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s May 28 inauguration of India’s new Parliament building, aimed at moving away from the nation’s colonial history, has been intensifying. An increasing number of opposition parties, currently standing at 21, have announced their decision to boycott the grand occasion.

In 2020, a comparable boycott occurred during the foundation stone-laying ceremony of the new building. This action took place amidst a severe Covid-19 pandemic and a significant protest by farmers on the outskirts of Delhi. The farmers’ protest was against the high-stakes agricultural reforms being promoted by the Modi government.

The new Parliament building, designed to accommodate 888 members in the lower house chamber and 300 members in a separate chamber for the upper house, is a crucial component of the government’s Central Vista redevelopment plan. The plan aims to revitalize the historic core of New Delhi. In comparison to the existing numbers of 543 and 250 members in the lower and upper houses respectively, the new building will provide increased seating capacity.

 

The government has faced criticism from the opposition regarding the new Parliament building for various reasons. Some of these controversies include the decision to continue construction during the Covid-19 crisis, objections to the “ferociousness" of the lion structure atop the building, and concerns regarding the individual inaugurating the structure. After two years of extensive construction involving 60,000 workers, the new Parliament building is now complete and will be inaugurated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Let’s take a closer look at the significant controversies surrounding the new Parliament building during the past two years:

‘Big Budget’

In 2020, there were reports of the Central government allocating a budget of Rs 20,000 crore for the Central Vista project amid the pandemic. However, Union Minister Hardeep Singh Puri clarified that the allocated budget was intended for a series of development projects planned until 2026. He mentioned that approximately Rs 862 crore was specifically earmarked for the new Parliament building.

Several political parties raised concerns about the necessity of such expenditure during the pandemic when resources were needed for fighting Covid-19.

The official website for the Central Vista project compared the funds allocated for Covid-19 and the Central Vista project. It stated that the one-time amount allocated for vaccination in the fiscal year 2021-22 was 175% higher than the total budget (Rs 20,000 crore) assigned to the Central Vista project, as per a report by India Today.

Green Cover Concerns

The Central Vista project, which includes the construction of the new Parliament building, the prime minister’s residence, and a central secretariat, faced criticism from environmental experts due to concerns about the impact on the existing green cover.

In response, the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) stated its commitment to minimizing tree cutting by focusing on tree transplantation. The government, through the Central Vista website, reported that 404 trees that were removed for the Parliament building have been successfully transplanted in the Eco-Park. Furthermore, they highlighted that over 80 percent of the translocated trees have survived, as per the report.

This approach aims to mitigate the negative effects on the green cover and emphasizes the efforts made to preserve the environment during the execution of the Central Vista project.

Design Consultant

The design consultant for the Parliament building project was HCP Designs, an architecture firm based in Gujarat, led by Bimal Patel. The firm was selected for the role and was paid Rs 229.75 crore for their consultancy services.

Bimal Patel has been known as Prime Minister Modi’s preferred architect and has been involved in several projects aligned with the Prime Minister’s vision. In response to allegations of favoritism regarding the selection of the design firm, the Central Vista website stated that the bids were thoroughly examined by the Central Public Works Department. Firms were evaluated based on their detailed approach, methodology, and concept design presentation before being chosen for the project.

Lion ‘Too Ferocious’

In July 2022, Prime Minister Narendra Modi revealed the national emblem that was placed on the new Parliament building. However, controversy arose regarding the expression of the lion depicted in the emblem. Several politicians expressed concerns, stating that the lions appeared “ferocious."

In response to the controversy, a petition was filed in the Supreme Court challenging the new emblem. The petitioners argued that the lions in the new emblem had an aggressive and open-mouthed expression, unlike the serene and composed appearance of the lions depicted in the state emblem kept at the Sarnath Museum in Varanasi.

The dispute revolved around the contrasting perceptions of the lion’s expression and its alignment with the symbolism and aesthetics of the national emblem. The Supreme Court rejected the petition against the new emblem, stating that it did not violate the provisions of the State Emblem of India Act, 2005.

Latest Row Over ‘PM, Not President’

Shortly before its scheduled opening, the new Parliament building became embroiled in a new controversy as as Modi, rather than the president, was invited to inaugurate it.

This decision received criticism from opposition leaders who argued that the head of state, rather than the head of government, should conduct the inauguration.

In defense of the move, Union Minister Hardeep Singh Puri pointed out that former prime ministers Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi had also inaugurated various premises within the Parliament in the past.

Sengol

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh on Friday claimed there is no documented evidence of Lord Mountbatten, C Rajagopalachari and Jawaharlal Nehru describing the ‘Sengol’ as a symbol of transfer of power by the British to India.

He also alleged that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his drum-beaters are using the ceremonial sceptre for their political ends in Tamil Nadu.

The ‘Sengol’ will be installed close to the Chair of the Lok Sabha speaker after the new Parliament building is inaugurated by Modi on May 28, an event 20 Opposition parties, including the Congress, are boycotting.

[Spartan]

 

[ZoomNaidu]

@Spartan - Ferocious Lion ayithe picha comedy 😂😂, Simham kuda Pappu lekka vundaali anukunnaremo Congress 

[pakeer_saab]

On 5/24/2023 at 1:27 PM, Spartan said:

if you dont want to attend....they why even contest and represent the people...

you cant fight for peoples issues by shunning the parliament sessions...

suckers....

As many as 19 opposition parties, including the Congress, Left, TMC, SP and AAP, came together and announced their decision to boycott the inauguration of the new Parliament building by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, saying they find no value in a new building

these same opposition parties were silent when Sonia inaugurated everything without having any govt position on her name, while cry at PM of nation opening parliament

[Spartan]

20 minutes ago, ZoomNaidu said:

@Spartan - Ferocious Lion ayithe picha comedy 😂😂, Simham kuda Pappu lekka vundaali anukunnaremo Congress 

adi highlight asalu

[pakeer_saab]

1 hour ago, Spartan said:

All the contros..

 

The dispute surrounding Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s May 28 inauguration of India’s new Parliament building, aimed at moving away from the nation’s colonial history, has been intensifying. An increasing number of opposition parties, currently standing at 21, have announced their decision to boycott the grand occasion.

In 2020, a comparable boycott occurred during the foundation stone-laying ceremony of the new building. This action took place amidst a severe Covid-19 pandemic and a significant protest by farmers on the outskirts of Delhi. The farmers’ protest was against the high-stakes agricultural reforms being promoted by the Modi government.

The new Parliament building, designed to accommodate 888 members in the lower house chamber and 300 members in a separate chamber for the upper house, is a crucial component of the government’s Central Vista redevelopment plan. The plan aims to revitalize the historic core of New Delhi. In comparison to the existing numbers of 543 and 250 members in the lower and upper houses respectively, the new building will provide increased seating capacity.

 

The government has faced criticism from the opposition regarding the new Parliament building for various reasons. Some of these controversies include the decision to continue construction during the Covid-19 crisis, objections to the “ferociousness" of the lion structure atop the building, and concerns regarding the individual inaugurating the structure. After two years of extensive construction involving 60,000 workers, the new Parliament building is now complete and will be inaugurated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Let’s take a closer look at the significant controversies surrounding the new Parliament building during the past two years:

‘Big Budget’

In 2020, there were reports of the Central government allocating a budget of Rs 20,000 crore for the Central Vista project amid the pandemic. However, Union Minister Hardeep Singh Puri clarified that the allocated budget was intended for a series of development projects planned until 2026. He mentioned that approximately Rs 862 crore was specifically earmarked for the new Parliament building.

Several political parties raised concerns about the necessity of such expenditure during the pandemic when resources were needed for fighting Covid-19.

The official website for the Central Vista project compared the funds allocated for Covid-19 and the Central Vista project. It stated that the one-time amount allocated for vaccination in the fiscal year 2021-22 was 175% higher than the total budget (Rs 20,000 crore) assigned to the Central Vista project, as per a report by India Today.

Green Cover Concerns

The Central Vista project, which includes the construction of the new Parliament building, the prime minister’s residence, and a central secretariat, faced criticism from environmental experts due to concerns about the impact on the existing green cover.

In response, the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) stated its commitment to minimizing tree cutting by focusing on tree transplantation. The government, through the Central Vista website, reported that 404 trees that were removed for the Parliament building have been successfully transplanted in the Eco-Park. Furthermore, they highlighted that over 80 percent of the translocated trees have survived, as per the report.

This approach aims to mitigate the negative effects on the green cover and emphasizes the efforts made to preserve the environment during the execution of the Central Vista project.

Design Consultant

The design consultant for the Parliament building project was HCP Designs, an architecture firm based in Gujarat, led by Bimal Patel. The firm was selected for the role and was paid Rs 229.75 crore for their consultancy services.

Bimal Patel has been known as Prime Minister Modi’s preferred architect and has been involved in several projects aligned with the Prime Minister’s vision. In response to allegations of favoritism regarding the selection of the design firm, the Central Vista website stated that the bids were thoroughly examined by the Central Public Works Department. Firms were evaluated based on their detailed approach, methodology, and concept design presentation before being chosen for the project.

Lion ‘Too Ferocious’

In July 2022, Prime Minister Narendra Modi revealed the national emblem that was placed on the new Parliament building. However, controversy arose regarding the expression of the lion depicted in the emblem. Several politicians expressed concerns, stating that the lions appeared “ferocious."

In response to the controversy, a petition was filed in the Supreme Court challenging the new emblem. The petitioners argued that the lions in the new emblem had an aggressive and open-mouthed expression, unlike the serene and composed appearance of the lions depicted in the state emblem kept at the Sarnath Museum in Varanasi.

The dispute revolved around the contrasting perceptions of the lion’s expression and its alignment with the symbolism and aesthetics of the national emblem. The Supreme Court rejected the petition against the new emblem, stating that it did not violate the provisions of the State Emblem of India Act, 2005.

Latest Row Over ‘PM, Not President’

Shortly before its scheduled opening, the new Parliament building became embroiled in a new controversy as as Modi, rather than the president, was invited to inaugurate it.

This decision received criticism from opposition leaders who argued that the head of state, rather than the head of government, should conduct the inauguration.

In defense of the move, Union Minister Hardeep Singh Puri pointed out that former prime ministers Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi had also inaugurated various premises within the Parliament in the past.

Sengol

Congress leader Jairam Ramesh on Friday claimed there is no documented evidence of Lord Mountbatten, C Rajagopalachari and Jawaharlal Nehru describing the ‘Sengol’ as a symbol of transfer of power by the British to India.

He also alleged that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his drum-beaters are using the ceremonial sceptre for their political ends in Tamil Nadu.

The ‘Sengol’ will be installed close to the Chair of the Lok Sabha speaker after the new Parliament building is inaugurated by Modi on May 28, an event 20 Opposition parties, including the Congress, are boycotting.

KCR spend more than 1500 crores on assembly

Sonia spent 1800 crores on foreign treatments without holding govt position other than just a cabinet rank of NAC chairwomen

shameless people do not understand the purpose of building our own moving away from colonial history

 

i think real issue is delimitation that is going to happen after 24

[Spartan]

2 minutes ago, pakeer_saab said:

these same opposition parties were silent when Sonia inaugurated everything without having any govt position on her name, while cry at PM of nation opening parliament

adi chesindi kabatte meeku vote vesam.. meeru kuda ade chestara ani kunda edupulu eduataru liberandu gallu appudu patith kaburlu cheppukuntu @ZoomNaidu

[pakeer_saab]

Congress does not want people of India to build their own identity away from colonial past, they enjoyed power dividing people all these years, its hard to digest that they will never see power at center ever again

[Funkops]

On 5/24/2023 at 1:27 PM, Spartan said:

if you dont want to attend....they why even contest and represent the people...

you cant fight for peoples issues by shunning the parliament sessions...

suckers....

As many as 19 opposition parties, including the Congress, Left, TMC, SP and AAP, came together and announced their decision to boycott the inauguration of the new Parliament building by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, saying they find no value in a new building

Same as Jalaganna boycotting Capital inauguration when in opposition.

[ZoomNaidu]

21 minutes ago, Funkops said:

Same as Jalaganna boycotting Capital inauguration when in opposition.

Temporary building ki vasthey emundhi raakapothey emundhile ani anukoni vuntaadu  😃😃