Hindus have no right to deny existence of LGBT

[Jatka Bandi]

Hinduism is style of living. They have embraced all different living things in this world. If any Hindu speaks against something, they do not speak against their existence but their style of living. Such disagreements come with everyone. Pertaining to the topic, they have disapproved women shaking their **** publicly in the faces of people, men shaking their weaners publicly; likewise, lgbtq doing nuisance openly. I do not feel they have a problem with the pure existence of lgbtq.

[Sheri]

1 hour ago, lollilolli2020 said:

same goes with xtians and peacefuls too.  
India lo liberal muchata matladatharu, ikkada conservative matalu. like pro life against abortion in case of xtians, incase of peacefuls sharia law kavali antaru. 

 

Topic mida maatladu. Akkada Hinduism lgbt existence ni deny cheyakudadhu ani antunnadu OP. Mari bhakth lu ikkdaku vachi endhuku deny chesthunnaru? 

[shaktimaan]

26 minutes ago, Sheri said:

Topic mida maatladu. Akkada Hinduism lgbt existence ni deny cheyakudadhu ani antunnadu OP. Mari bhakth lu ikkdaku vachi endhuku deny chesthunnaru? 

veellu anthe bhayya

always deflect to something else..never on point

malla oka gang untadi...validation kosam tag cheskuni, reactions ichukuni sankalu guddukuntaru

[lollilolli2020]

1 hour ago, Sheri said:

Topic mida maatladu. Akkada Hinduism lgbt existence ni deny cheyakudadhu ani antunnadu OP. Mari bhakth lu ikkdaku vachi endhuku deny chesthunnaru? 

bhakt gallu ikkadiki ochchi right wing antunnaru annav kada daniki cheptunna its not isolated that bhakts supporting conservatives, even hardcore xtians and peacefuls do the same. 

https://nypost.com/2023/06/15/detroit-area-council-bans-lgbtq-flags-from-city-property/

[veerigadu]

2 hours ago, Jatka Bandi said:

Hinduism is style of living. They have embraced all different living things in this world. If any Hindu speaks against something, they do not speak against their existence but their style of living. Such disagreements come with everyone. Pertaining to the topic, they have disapproved women shaking their **** publicly in the faces of people, men shaking their weaners publicly; likewise, lgbtq doing nuisance openly. I do not feel they have a problem with the pure existence of lgbtq.

Then it’s a question of decency. It has nothing to do with gender or sexual orientation. But mainstream media lo narrative is completely different. They are saying trans people are nothing but mentally ill ani 

[Shameless]

4 hours ago, veerigadu said:

1. Lord shiva is ardha nareeshwarudu

2. Arjunudu in mahabaratham was a eunuch during his agnathaavasam. His name was brihannalaaa

3. Bheeshma was killed only coz of eunuch in kurukshetraaaa…

4. There are kinneras and kimpurushasss since eternity 

5. most importantly, when lord Rama was leaving ayodhya for vanavasam, People kept following him until river banks. According to Ramayana, after a certain point Lord Rama asked all men and women to stop following and go home. He did not use any verbiage in reference to third gender. He addressed the message to only men and women. 
 

Since he didn’t say anything about third gender, they waited until he returned back from 14 years of vanavasam. He was touched by their loyalty and he blessed them saying they will rule the world during Kaliyugaaaa……The current  upliftment of lgbt people is due to blessing of lord Rama ani sardukondiiii inkaaa…or hate lord Rama for giving the boon to them. 

 

 

In conclusion, Hindu gods and scriptures validate the existence of LGBT people. 

I don't think any hindu as ever commented on only male and female existence...

but current scenario enti ante ee LGBT gaalla aagadalu maree haddhu meeripothunnay...why can't they just be normal...why do they have to show off??

[Jatka Bandi]

14 minutes ago, veerigadu said:

Then it’s a question of decency. It has nothing to do with gender or sexual orientation. But mainstream media lo narrative is completely different. They are saying trans people are nothing but mentally ill ani 

when have the narrative in mainstream media ever balanced?

Mentally ill is an opinion. Acceptance is different. I think you are confusing between the two.

[Heroin]

5 hours ago, veerigadu said:

1. Lord shiva is ardha nareeshwarudu

2. Arjunudu in mahabaratham was a eunuch during his agnathaavasam. His name was brihannalaaa

3. Bheeshma was killed only coz of eunuch in kurukshetraaaa…

4. There are kinneras and kimpurushasss since eternity 

5. most importantly, when lord Rama was leaving ayodhya for vanavasam, People kept following him until river banks. According to Ramayana, after a certain point Lord Rama asked all men and women to stop following and go home. He did not use any verbiage in reference to third gender. He addressed the message to only men and women. 
 

Since he didn’t say anything about third gender, they waited until he returned back from 14 years of vanavasam. He was touched by their loyalty and he blessed them saying they will rule the world during Kaliyugaaaa……The current  upliftment of lgbt people is due to blessing of lord Rama ani sardukondiiii inkaaa…or hate lord Rama for giving the boon to them. 

 

 

In conclusion, Hindu gods and scriptures validate the existence of LGBT people. 

Entidi sarcasm aa

[veerigadu]

25 minutes ago, Jatka Bandi said:

when have the narrative in mainstream media ever balanced?

Mentally ill is an opinion. Acceptance is different. I think you are confusing between the two.

I’m not. Even in India some states are against same sex marriage. AP happens to be one such state 

[Jatka Bandi]

Just now, veerigadu said:

I’m not. Even in India some states are against same sex marriage. AP happens to be one such state 

Again, why is it a Hindu problem? Do we have states with only Hindus?

[TOM_BHAYYA]

5 hours ago, veerigadu said:

1. Lord shiva is ardha nareeshwarudu

2. Arjunudu in mahabaratham was a eunuch during his agnathaavasam. His name was brihannalaaa

3. Bheeshma was killed only coz of eunuch in kurukshetraaaa…

4. There are kinneras and kimpurushasss since eternity 

5. most importantly, when lord Rama was leaving ayodhya for vanavasam, People kept following him until river banks. According to Ramayana, after a certain point Lord Rama asked all men and women to stop following and go home. He did not use any verbiage in reference to third gender. He addressed the message to only men and women. 
 

Since he didn’t say anything about third gender, they waited until he returned back from 14 years of vanavasam. He was touched by their loyalty and he blessed them saying they will rule the world during Kaliyugaaaa……The current  upliftment of lgbt people is due to blessing of lord Rama ani sardukondiiii inkaaa…or hate lord Rama for giving the boon to them. 

 

 

In conclusion, Hindu gods and scriptures validate the existence of LGBT people. 

Eella charithra edho o aarnella mundhe cheppunte khammam lo ma annagari vigraham edho aa roopam lo ne pettevallam ga anna

[veerigadu]

20 minutes ago, Jatka Bandi said:

Again, why is it a Hindu problem? Do we have states with only Hindus?

My point is. Bible doesn’t recognize third gender. Quran very much same. On the other hand, Hinduism is a different story altogether. The whole narrative that there are only two sexes by nature is wrong antunna.
 

From times immemorial, there is been 3rd gender. And it’s very fluid by nature. There is a lot of confusion on that particular domain. 

[veerigadu]

9 minutes ago, TOM_BHAYYA said:

Eella charithra edho o aarnella mundhe cheppunte khammam lo ma annagari vigraham edho aa roopam lo ne pettevallam ga anna

Anna…..

[Jatka Bandi]

Just now, veerigadu said:

My point is. Bible doesn’t recognize third gender. Quran very much same. On the other hand, Hinduism is a different story altogether. The whole narrative that there are only sexes by nature is wrong antunna. From times immemorial, there is been 3rd gender. And it’s very fluid by nature. There is a lot of confusion on that particular domain. 

Ok. That is an opinion and a debate that can be had. Why are you attacking a religion then?
 

Hindus have no right to deny existence of LGBT

[veerigadu]

5 minutes ago, Jatka Bandi said:

Ok. That is an opinion and a debate that can be had. Why are you attacking a religion then?
 

Hindus have no right to deny existence of LGBT

Because I don’t see a reference of Jesus or allah interacting with any third gender. Whereas our scriptures have recognized and documented them. Hence Hindus cannot deny their existence as well as their rights. If they are forbidden or untouchable, then our own gods wouldn’t have interacted with them.
 

Im not sure why you are struggling to understand my point here. I can only say this about Hindus since I have references from Hindu scriptures.