Morals

[Tryad]

1 minute ago, KaipuRaja said:

Then give full details of your company and USCIS will device whether it’s good or not.

Cheskunte chesko.. okati kante ekuva cheykunte not smart ante we can understand how smart you are

topic is morals.

okati kante ekkuva cheyyakunte not smart ani nenekkada anna? chesey vaallu smart anna. anthe.

cheyyani vaallu kooda smart aey. They're probably working on their pet projects.

[Paamu]

38 minutes ago, veerigadu said:

This holds true only if jobs are in shortage. Just like rice right now. 

Even then doing multiple jobs is not immoral. Especially if you are willing to deal with job stress and risk with a premature death situation. 

IT jobs shortage undi kada now ? 

[Konebhar6]

1 hour ago, Telugodura456 said:

You owe your employer work. How do you owe them your time ?

BTW - most "professional" companies regularly overbill. Overbilling is common in offshore where same resource is billed to many projects but resource is paid only 8 hours. Even in onsite if a person works in their own company office and not client office - then  their companies will make them work for multiple projects but pay them only 8 hours.

A person working on multiple projects, is still doing only 8 hrs of work for which he/she is paid. If the person is working for multiple clients, vendors should disclose that to the client and only bill for the hours the consultant worked. Of course reality is different. In terms of offshore company, they have overheads and they have to show profits to their shareholders. 

Asalu discussion selective morality gurinchi anna. A person doing multiple jobs have no right to point their fingers at people making money in the market taking advantage of rice situation.

[TuesdayStories]

Enni extra biyyam kattalu tesukunte ante maatalu kaateyyu paamu 

[Konebhar6]

2 hours ago, Tryad said:

that's why I said that it is immoral only if there's an option to take 4hrs contract, and the contractors wantedly charge for the hours they don't work. There's no such option and the contracts drawn are generic.

the fault is with the contract here. Not the guys doing multiple contracts. Companies can pay by the hour if they feel like they are being overcharged.

if work quality and delivery is not upto standard, then fire the contractor.

There is conflict of interest as well. A person working FT cannot take up a 2nd job unless he/she has company policy that allows it. Working for more than 1 client might raise conflicts of interest (if both clients work in similar industry), reduces productivity and quality of work.

I am not judging people doing multiple jobs. I am only saying we cannot be selective in our morals. Someone doing multiple jobs has no right to condemn people who are making money taking advantage of current rice shortage situation.

 

[rmJU72]

This hoarding of rice situation is not like people taking up multiple jobs.

it’s like people taking up ALL the available jobs and then selling those jobs to you if you pay them a fee.

[Tryad]

6 minutes ago, rmJU72 said:

This hoarding of rice situation is not like people taking up multiple jobs.

it’s like people taking up ALL the available jobs and then selling those jobs to you if you pay them a fee.

clearly the smartest guy in this db.

[Telugodura456]

1 hour ago, Konebhar6 said:

A person working on multiple projects, is still doing only 8 hrs of work for which he/she is paid. If the person is working for multiple clients, vendors should disclose that to the client and only bill for the hours the consultant worked. Of course reality is different. In terms of offshore company, they have overheads and they have to show profits to their shareholders. 

Asalu discussion selective morality gurinchi anna. A person doing multiple jobs have no right to point their fingers at people making money in the market taking advantage of rice situation.

Comparision is somehwat there but not still fully justified.

A job offer is negotiated settlement between two people. But ricebag is simple grabbing. If i find a capable guy who can do two jobs - he is still better than a guy who does not do a single job properly.

[Konebhar6]

5 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

Comparision is somehwat there but not still fully justified.

A job offer is negotiated settlement between two people. But ricebag is simple grabbing. If i find a capable guy who can do two jobs - he is still better than a guy who does not do a single job properly.

You are thinking from the consultant point of view. If you think more from company's perspective, its different.

[Telugodura456]

26 minutes ago, Konebhar6 said:

You are thinking from the consultant point of view. If you think more from company's perspective, its different.

I am saying from company perspective only.

If i am getting better work output from a guy who is doing his second job with me then why would i care for a guy doing a single job but shoddy work ?

[Konebhar6]

3 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

I am saying from company perspective only.

If i am getting better work output from a guy who is doing his second job with me then why would i care for a guy doing a single job but shoddy work ?

Agree on the quality of work. But billing vishayam vaste, should he not bill only for the work done from each client? Morally alochiste.

[hydusguy]

anni RTO ayyay.. no need to fight on multi