400 Kms Hyderabad metro!

[hyperbole]

[kevinUsa]

1 minute ago, hyperbole said:

okate sari  kadthal varaku veste set kada 

[Tryad]

lmao. what's the use?

delhi metro is already 400km, and is still not operationally profitable. Without better land use (which is anathema for the upper middle class people living in Hyd), metro is a wasteful project that is only built for vanity purposes.

applies to all cities in India.

[kevinUsa]

4 minutes ago, Tryad said:

lmao. what's the use?

delhi metro is already 400km, and is still not operationally profitable. Without better land use (which is anathema for the upper middle class people living in Hyd), metro is a wasteful project that is only built for vanity purposes.

applies to all cities in India.

public transport evvaru profit kosam cheyaru 

[Tryad]

4 minutes ago, kevinUsa said:

public transport evvaru profit kosam cheyaru 

abboh.. aithe free travel pettamanu..

metro is constructed only so people like you can travel without brushing shoulders with the poor.

buses in Hyd carry 10times the traffic that metro does. When the length is increased to 400km, buses will still carry 90% of public transit traffic, like it does for Delhi.

Metro is a huge waste of public money to create an elitist mode of transport.

[Dallas_c_how_dare]

5 minutes ago, Tryad said:

abboh.. aithe free travel pettamanu..

metro is constructed only so people like you can travel without brushing shoulders with the poor.

buses in Hyd carry 10times the traffic that metro does. When the length is increased to 400km, buses will still carry 90% of public transit traffic, like it does for Delhi.

Metro is a huge waste of public money to create an elitist mode of transport.

Sare em cheddam antav mari?

[shaktimaan]

6 minutes ago, Tryad said:

metro is constructed only so people like you can travel without brushing shoulders with the poor.

nee solution cheppu mari

[hyperbole]

20 minutes ago, Tryad said:

lmao. what's the use?

delhi metro is already 400km, and is still not operationally profitable. Without better land use (which is anathema for the upper middle class people living in Hyd), metro is a wasteful project that is only built for vanity purposes.

applies to all cities in India.

No metro in the world is profitable. It is an affordable mass transport system which will make life easier for everyone 

profitable if you consider human productivity aspects and how much government and individuals would save on fuel consumption/taxes etc

[csrcsr]

18 minutes ago, Tryad said:

abboh.. aithe free travel pettamanu..

metro is constructed only so people like you can travel without brushing shoulders with the poor.

buses in Hyd carry 10times the traffic that metro does. When the length is increased to 400km, buses will still carry 90% of public transit traffic, like it does for Delhi.

Metro is a huge waste of public money to create an elitist mode of transport.

But useful kada annna a guy who lives in lb nagar  or old city he has job in begumpet hitech city , etc need not be it job , chinna Job aina he is paid for 9 hours vadu 45 mins one way lo chesukoni koncham affordable house lo undochu kada , bus route untadi for him it takes 2 hour one way emi happy ga untadu, companies perk kinda metro pass kuda istayi 

[Tryad]

3 minutes ago, hyperbole said:

No metro in the world is profitable. It is an affordable mass transport system which will make life easier for everyone 

profitable if you consider human productivity aspects and how much government and individuals would save on fuel consumption/taxes etc

who says so? many Asian metros are profitable because they operate at a large scale.

Hyd or Delhi or Bangalore will never achieve that scale even if they build 1000km metro. The key is land use around Hyd metro stations. There's not enough density around Hyd that is sprawling like mad.. So Hyd will never achieve critical mass

metro projects in India are already written off as flops and vanity projects.

just admit that metro exists so upper class people can travel in a/c while 90% of public transit goers still ahve to depend on extremely crowded buses. What about their productivity? I guess it doesn't matter as long as Hyd has the longest metro in India perhaps.

[Tryad]

12 minutes ago, shaktimaan said:

nee solution cheppu mari

increase housing density around Hyd Metro, including a large portion as public housing since poor people still need to travel to these places to service the kings and queens that live there.

That one thing is enough to make Hyd Metro worthy of investment, but it'll never happen, if even politicians pay lip service to it.

[Tryad]

3 minutes ago, csrcsr said:

But useful kada annna a guy who lives in lb nagar  or old city he has job in begumpet hitech city , etc need not be it job , chinna Job aina he is paid for 9 hours vadu 45 mins one way lo chesukoni koncham affordable house lo undochu kada , bus route untadi for him it takes 2 hour one way emi happy ga untadu, companies perk kinda metro pass kuda istayi 

useful for whom anna? how many people are using metro now? hardly 3.5 - 4 lakhs? do you know how much buses in Hyd carry with less than 1% of investment? close to 10 times.

metro is fine. it is definitely useful as a mass transit option, much more efficient than buses.. but the key is to achieve that 'mass' numbers, which none of the Indian cities will.

that's why its a waste of investment.

[kevinUsa]

1 minute ago, Tryad said:

increase housing density around Hyd Metro, including a large portion as public housing since poor people still need to travel to these places to service the kings and queens that live there.

That one thing is enough to make Hyd Metro worthy of investment, but it'll never happen, if even politicians pay lip service to it.

ee hallucinations baga untayi bro nee deggara 

[Tryad]

Just now, kevinUsa said:

ee hallucinations baga untayi bro nee deggara 

hyd world class city aney hallucination kante naa?

[praying]

3 minutes ago, Tryad said:

who says so? many Asian metros are profitable because they operate at a large scale.

Hyd or Delhi or Bangalore will never achieve that scale even if they build 1000km metro. The key is land use around Hyd metro stations. There's not enough density around Hyd that is sprawling like mad.. So Hyd will never achieve critical mass

metro projects in India are already written off as flops and vanity projects.

just admit that metro exists so upper class people can travel in a/c while 90% of public transit goers still ahve to depend on extremely crowded buses. What about their productivity? I guess it doesn't matter as long as Hyd has the longest metro in India perhaps.

uncle upper class vadu car lo pothadu kani metro ekuthada? nuvvu mari america lo culture ni compare chestunnav. Even here have you seen any c level exec going on a metro?