🙏🙏🙏🙏 Pawan makes sense

[Tryad]

19 minutes ago, trent said:

ante a sanatana lo e stalin annattu sathisahagamanam leda? 

school lo edo class lo e sathi sahagamanam wrong ani evaro famous ayana cheppinattu gurthu

famous ayna cheptey cheppadu.. sanatana dharma lo adhey undedhi..

aa famous ayna cheptey leni badha, ippudu stalin cheptey ochhindha?

 

[reality]

40 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

first what is the meaning of "sanatana"..? if we know the meaning...then we can discuss clearly...

 

26 minutes ago, trent said:

ante a sanatana lo e stalin annattu sathisahagamanam leda? 

school lo edo class lo e sathi sahagamanam wrong ani evaro famous ayana cheppinattu gurthu

Sanathana Dharmam ante a virtue that is being followed from the beginning of time, a precursor (with the hope that it will be followed eternally).

Like you said @dasari4kntr, technically every religion believes that they have their own Sanathana-Dharmam (See definition above). But, which religion is more ancient and the starter and thus the gold standard for Sanathana Dharmam is open for research.

Sathi Sahagamanam is not part of Sanathana Dharamam, simply because it was introduced in the middle (not a precursor). All these mid-introduced customs are atrocious, superstitious and manufactured solely for the convenience of generation of that time. 

For example, lets now add one more word, Hindu-Sanathana-Dharmam. Hindu dharmam never said to hate other religion, paramatha sahanam is one of the core principle of Sanathana Hindu Dharmam. Is it in tact now? NO. No one in current generation has right to claim Sanathana Hindu Dharmam including Sanghis… everyone are hypocrites now, but Sanghis claiming this for political benefit are disgusting pieces of shitt and punishable than anyone else.

[dasari4kntr]

32 minutes ago, trent said:

ante a sanatana lo e stalin annattu sathisahagamanam leda? 

school lo edo class lo e sathi sahagamanam wrong ani evaro famous ayana cheppinattu gurthu

 

i think you need read beyond sathisahagamanam point...(though it is there...but that gives single line political narrative..before that you need to read more..)

 

for example..

Example 1....

bouddam...tells givup your desires..

jainam..tells givup jeeva himsa...

Ājīvika...tells about determinism...

all these three religions...exisits at the same time...

korikalu champuko anna buddudu and buddini shishyulu fighted with Makkhali Gosala (who is founder of the religion..)...because he is obstacle for spreading the budda religion... (which is contradicting of give up desires..)

ahmisa ni bhodinchina jainulu physically fighted with  Makkhali Gosala because of difference of thought... (again jains give up there own preaching..)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makkhali_Gosala

 

Example 2...

charvakam is non vedic school of thought...they questioned the existance of vedas...but now people who are supporting the sanata they are claiming charvaka also part of hinduim..

still i dont know the meaning of "hindhu" word which came from abroad not from sanskrit...

 

Example 3...

aham brahsmi ani chppina advitam fighted with bouddam...advitam one of the main reason for declining of bouddam in india...similarly it got same fight with dvitam...etc

 

ila chppukuntoo pothe lot many examples...all these sub systems are collectively submerged into the santanam for this present day society...without knowing the exact meaning of it...and every one just defending sanatana with out knowing what it is ....or some giving thier own meaing... 

nuvvu adugutunna sathisahagamanam examples is bottom of the stack...to address this..we need to address mahabharath..(as it was mentioned in pandava parents scenario..)...which is unnecessary at this stage...which leads to more contraversy...

but...my point is...oka manishini socially discriminate cheyyadam mana sanatanam aithe..? is it good sanatanam? or bad sanatanam..?  

as far as i know santhana...means ancient and permanent...is that means..caste system is ancient and permanent? 

[Dallas_c_how_dare]

On 9/11/2023 at 9:15 PM, MrDexter said:

He is still an actor.

 

Gattiga veedi thappula guirnchi matladithe edusthadu.

 

malli noru esukuni ph norikivachinattu vaguthadu?

 

Package theesukuni sallaga padukoka endhuku veediki?

 

Antha dula ga unte,, andharini aath care ani gournd up JS build cheyyalsindhi. 

 

On 9/11/2023 at 9:45 PM, MrDexter said:

ee lamb Dk gadi kosam diggin cheyyalsina avasaram ledhu

 

Hindu Dharmam prakaram peli chesukunna ardhangini edipinchi, kotha figures tho akramasambhandham pettukuni kulakadam.

 

Ah figures marej adughtunnaru nuvvu 10gei ani divorce eivvadam

 

malli pelli cheuskovdam.

 

Malli Vidakulu.

Malli Pelli

Malli Vidakulu

 

Veedini AP lo youth thappa families andharu thu ani ummestharu.

Whats ur take on ysr pavuram? And yesu reddy ricebag?

[Tryad]

6 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

 

i think you need read beyond sathisahagamanam point...(though it is there...but that gives single line political narrative..before that you need to read more..)

 

for example..

Example 1....

bouddam...tells givup your desires..

jainam..tells givup jeeva himsa...

Ājīvika...tells about determinism...

all these three religions...exisits at the same time...

korikalu champuko anna buddudu and buddini shishyulu fighted with Makkhali Gosala (who is founder of the religion..)...because he is obstacle for spreading the budda religion... (which is contradicting of give up desires..)

ahmisa ni bhodinchina jainulu physically fighted with  Makkhali Gosala because of difference of thought... (again jains give up there own preaching..)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makkhali_Gosala

 

Example 2...

charvakam is non vedic school of thought...they questioned the existance of vedas...but now people who are supporting the sanata they are claiming charvaka also part of hinduim..

still i dont know the meaning of "hindhu" word which came from abroad not from sanskrit...

 

Example 3...

aham brahsmi ani chppina advitam fighted with bouddam...advitam one of the main reason for declining of bouddam in india...similarly it got same fight with dvitam...etc

 

ila chppukuntoo pothe lot many examples...all these sub systems are collectively submerged into the santanam for this present day society...without knowing the exact meaning of it...and every one just defending sanatana with out knowing what it is ....or some giving thier own meaing... 

nuvvu adugutunna sathisahagamanam examples is bottom of the stack...to address this..we need to address mahabharath..(as it was mentioned in pandava parents scenario..)...which is unnecessary at this stage...which leads to more contraversy...

but...my point is...oka manishini socially discriminate cheyyadam mana sanatanam aithe..? is it good sanatanam? or bad sanatanam..?  

as far as i know santhana...means ancient and permanent...is that means..caste system is ancient and permanent? 

so enti cheptunnav last lo?

eeroju neetho manchi ga maatladey friends majority repu either will indulge in genocide of muslims, or support it loudly.

appudu kooda ila neutral stand teeskuntaava?

hindu society lo idhi jaragatam khaayam, the way it is moving. nee laanti neutrals valla paisa prayojanam ledhu

left right same anukuntu bhujalu thadumukovatam tappa.

[Maggavale]

16 minutes ago, reality said:

 

now, but Sanghis claiming this for political benefit are disgusting pieces of shitt and punishable than anyone else.

Annaa //  flease don't insult shitt  , sincere request . 

[dasari4kntr]

left and right words introduced only after french revolution...

but common sense was there since pretty long time...

people should stop using left side or right side...and just use common sense...

if there is something wrong...to adresss or question that wrong...we dont need left or right tags...

we need left and right common balance..... not only left side or not only right side....

[Tryad]

14 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

but...my point is...oka manishini socially discriminate cheyyadam mana sanatanam aithe..? is it good sanatanam? or bad sanatanam..?  

saripoyaav po. looks like you have a lot of friends who are sanghis.

repu sure ga vaallu muslims ni champataaniki ready avtaaru.. good luck dealing with them.

 

[Tryad]

2 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

left and right words introduced only after french revolution...

but common sense was there since pretty long time...

people should stop using left side or right side...and just use common sense...

if there is something wrong...to adresss or question that wrong...we dont need left or right tags...

we need left and right common balance..... not only left side or not only right side....

common balance kaadhu.. you need to have clearly directed ethics. whether it shifts completely to right or left doesn't matter.

you can't even conclude that eradicating sanatana dharma is good, and Stalin said nothing wrong.

so in a fight between a nazi and a jew, you'll use common balance aa? brain vaadu.

develop some ethical system for yourself, and test it against others and prune it.. oorkay neutral unte great anukoku.

[Tryad]

5 minutes ago, dasari4kntr said:

left and right words introduced only after french revolution...

but common sense was there since pretty long time...

people should stop using left side or right side...and just use common sense...

if there is something wrong...to adresss or question that wrong...we dont need left or right tags...

we need left and right common balance..... not only left side or not only right side....

Stalin may be doing politics.. but its not the bad kind.

remember, veedhullo kathhi lu pattukoni tirigedhi dravidians kaadhu. dravidians never passed any legislation discriminating a section of people.. BJP em chesthondho legislatively telusuko mundhu... manipur riots ki 100% reason BJP aey.

balance vaadatam anni chotala vardhinchadu.

naaku dravidians meedha chaala complaints unnai.. like their utter carelessness when it comes to animal lives.. meat thinatam edho pedda ghana kaaryam annattu untaru yedhavalu

but they are nowhere comparable to the cruelty of sanghis..

[dasari4kntr]

please read all my comments in this thread..word by word...

 

[Allasaani_Peddana]

Entire Abrahamic religions is filled with rape, pedophilia, murder and slavery. Hindus vaddani Pakistan chesukunnaru. Not a single temple in entire capital city. Ippudu chettakuppalonchi erukoni tintunnaru. Vachharandi desodharrakulu, feminists. In Bengal, Hindu Women and Children were burnt alive. This was done by hindu hating commies.  . Asalu adi jarigandi kooda marchipoyaru. Hate through omission.

Ee kaalam lo Musaloditoni 13 years girl pelli Ok anta. Kashmir lo hindu genocide marchi povala.. Filthy slave owing degenerates.  These commies  support genocide by *****.

[Tryad]

1 hour ago, dasari4kntr said:

please read all my comments in this thread..word by word...

 

Lmao. Mundhu oka ethical system aey ledhu neeku.

Vegan vishayam lo kooda same. Is it okay to kill animals for food ante cheppalev.. endukante then you can't defend killing cats dogs for food.. 

And if it's okay to kill why it's not okay to r@pe animals.. ivanni logical questions that can be answered only by someone who has thought through what his personal ethics are.

Edho guddiga internet lo sadivesi opinion emundhi, chatgpt kooda cheptundi. 

There's no need to read your response word by word because you have no moral system of your own. Oorkay neutral undatam ki kooda antha tekku avasaram ledhu.

Pls stick to posting pics and paintings. 

[Tryad]

3 hours ago, dasari4kntr said:

 

i think you need read beyond sathisahagamanam point...(though it is there...but that gives single line political narrative..before that you need to read more..)

 

for example..

Example 1....

bouddam...tells givup your desires..

jainam..tells givup jeeva himsa...

Ājīvika...tells about determinism...

all these three religions...exisits at the same time...

korikalu champuko anna buddudu and buddini shishyulu fighted with Makkhali Gosala (who is founder of the religion..)...because he is obstacle for spreading the budda religion... (which is contradicting of give up desires..)

ahmisa ni bhodinchina jainulu physically fighted with  Makkhali Gosala because of difference of thought... (again jains give up there own preaching..)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makkhali_Gosala

 

Example 2...

charvakam is non vedic school of thought...they questioned the existance of vedas...but now people who are supporting the sanata they are claiming charvaka also part of hinduim..

still i dont know the meaning of "hindhu" word which came from abroad not from sanskrit...

 

Example 3...

aham brahsmi ani chppina advitam fighted with bouddam...advitam one of the main reason for declining of bouddam in india...similarly it got same fight with dvitam...etc

 

ila chppukuntoo pothe lot many examples...all these sub systems are collectively submerged into the santanam for this present day society...without knowing the exact meaning of it...and every one just defending sanatana with out knowing what it is ....or some giving thier own meaing... 

nuvvu adugutunna sathisahagamanam examples is bottom of the stack...to address this..we need to address mahabharath..(as it was mentioned in pandava parents scenario..)...which is unnecessary at this stage...which leads to more contraversy...

but...my point is...oka manishini socially discriminate cheyyadam mana sanatanam aithe..? is it good sanatanam? or bad sanatanam..?  

as far as i know santhana...means ancient and permanent...is that means..caste system is ancient and permanent? 

so you don't know what sanatana dharma is, and so you can't take a stand one way or the other? and neither can you just stfu and mind your own business without equating both sanghis and those that are mocking sanatana dharma.

anyway, its clear to me that you have no will to learn and be a better human and are content with just posing as a decent guy. So here is Hindu benaras college published a comprehensive book in 1904 on what sanatana dharma is. you can read it here

https://www.rarebooksocietyofindia.org/book_archive/196174216674_10152693130586675.pdf

On the question of Ethics - Sanatana Dharma divides consciously separate beings into three stages of evolution. The first stage where the beings exclude others and develop individually their intellect, Men live for enjoyment (no mention about women) etc.. and hte second stage is when the being evolves in a way to unify all these separate selves (spiritual unity) and must do everything to enforce that unity. The third is pralaya - the end (kind of)..

during the first stage, everything that is done to exclude others is right. and in the second stage everything that is done to exclude others who've passed the first stage is wrong. in the third stage everything that helps it is right.

so according to sanatana dharma, if the society is stuck in the first stage, then any conduct that includes excluding others, living for selfish enjoyment, appropriation of stores of nature and gifts is all right, and not wrong.

-----------

the other dharmic religions you mention bauddham, jainam etc actually have an ethical system. sanatana dharma doesn't. its ethical system can also be described as 'for the convenience of the reader, based on whatever stage of evolution he perceives himself to be'.

and I've not even stepped on the minefield of bigotry and ill formed ideas of the caste system that sanatana dharma promotes.

its not wrong at all to call for its eradication. Read the book and tell me why you should be neutral on this issue?

 

 

[anna_gari_maata]

8 hours ago, dasari4kntr said:

 

i think you need read beyond sathisahagamanam point...(though it is there...but that gives single line political narrative..before that you need to read more..)

 

for example..

Example 1....

bouddam...tells givup your desires..

jainam..tells givup jeeva himsa...

Ājīvika...tells about determinism...

all these three religions...exisits at the same time...

korikalu champuko anna buddudu and buddini shishyulu fighted with Makkhali Gosala (who is founder of the religion..)...because he is obstacle for spreading the budda religion... (which is contradicting of give up desires..)

ahmisa ni bhodinchina jainulu physically fighted with  Makkhali Gosala because of difference of thought... (again jains give up there own preaching..)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makkhali_Gosala

 

Example 2...

charvakam is non vedic school of thought...they questioned the existance of vedas...but now people who are supporting the sanata they are claiming charvaka also part of hinduim..

still i dont know the meaning of "hindhu" word which came from abroad not from sanskrit...

 

Example 3...

aham brahsmi ani chppina advitam fighted with bouddam...advitam one of the main reason for declining of bouddam in india...similarly it got same fight with dvitam...etc

 

ila chppukuntoo pothe lot many examples...all these sub systems are collectively submerged into the santanam for this present day society...without knowing the exact meaning of it...and every one just defending sanatana with out knowing what it is ....or some giving thier own meaing... 

nuvvu adugutunna sathisahagamanam examples is bottom of the stack...to address this..we need to address mahabharath..(as it was mentioned in pandava parents scenario..)...which is unnecessary at this stage...which leads to more contraversy...

but...my point is...oka manishini socially discriminate cheyyadam mana sanatanam aithe..? is it good sanatanam? or bad sanatanam..?  

as far as i know santhana...means ancient and permanent...is that means..caste system is ancient and permanent? 

You are talking about dwaitam advaitam etc.and bringing caste system into the same thing. People who called for eradication want to eradicate all these schools of thoughts, no stone unturned. Once India becomes entire christian and muslim, do you think these school of thoughts exist anymore ? They are the soul of India. Stalin is a christian, and DMK is sympathizer. Do you even know how evil actual Stalin is ? Their only agenda is to remove the roots of subcontinental culture. Sanatana Dharma means bringing back the non-abrahamic and way of living, not bringing caste system etc.

Just because you eradicate one religion, will discrimination stop ? Joke of the year.