'Hindus Leave Canada Or...': Khalistan Terrorist Pannun's Open Threat; Will Trudeau Arrest Him?

[CanadianMalodu]

1 hour ago, Tryad said:

fine. your description of khalistani origins in Canada are more or less true. but the question remains.

why did Indian govt revive the khalistani movement that was in its final embers even in Canada until GoI played up the khalistani angle to snuff the anti farm law agitation.

now khalistanis are coming out of the wood works to make a$$es of themselves in public over a demand that can never materialize.

the answer is simple. Its not Canada that is playing vote bank politics with khalistanis.. It is India. And it will be the Hindus living in Canada that'll bear the brunt of this misadventure.

 

Indian government never revived the Khalistani movement. What does it stand to gain doing so? It's polar opposite rather, it gets to loose it's land mass once again, if Khalistan region were to be granted a statehood. Even worse, more demands for secession would rise as a consequence.

The farm law protests were sponsored by Khalistanis who took out to streets and the funding was from US , Canadian khalistani groups who are working with George Soros. That's where the money was coming from. There are Sikhs from these elements who are directly working on the payroll of Soros open society foundation.

Hindus may bear the burnt but it's shall only be for once or twice. You may see more acts of people banding up together for the sake of their own protection. These clashes already happened when Khalistanis confronted Indians celebrating their independence day. Hindus retaliated. I wouldn't be surprised if the Hindu groups are counter founded by Doval and team.

[Telugodura456]

2 hours ago, CanadianMalodu said:

No sophisticatation. Plain truth. Sikhs were part of British armed forces for a long time. They settled in Canada way before, and started to pull in their kin and kith. The idea of Khalistan statehood dates back to aftermath of second Anglo-Sikh war which disintegrated the sikh empire and the idea took a political turn in 1930, and 40s when British divided India on religious lines.  Those with the idea of separate statehood moved Canada, Post Indian partition but the inherent idea was always there in some of these stock Sikhs. The same thing happened during Khalistan movement and post Indira Gandhi's assassination. It's was this time when the most extreme version of Khalistani ideology was exported to Canada. They sympathize with each other, that's obvious. But Sikhs are traditionally not the demography that generated a lot of political weight in US unlike in Canada where their numbers are enough to pull strings in politics. Also, Sikhs were victims of the hate crimes post 9/11 which probably mellowed them along with the omnipresent pressure of assimilation 'melting pot' . The result is you get to see the likes of Nikki Haley, unlike the Mosaic nature of sticking to your own culture of Anglo Canada. Ultimately, their Canadian counterparts are political heavy weights and are capable of pooling money and execute actions.

so whats fundamentally wrong with idea of khalistan ?

[CanadianMalodu]

1 hour ago, lollilolli2020 said:

Ironically then PM was Senior Trudeau.

And that's not coincidence. Not many white Canadians like Sr.Trudeau. 

[Guest]

Just now, Telugodura456 said:

so whats fundamentally wrong with idea of khalistan ?

For people like you, nothing! Because some might actually try to raise an illegal " Kulasthaani" movement in Andhra out of frustration of losing power. 

[Telugodura456]

2 hours ago, CanadianMalodu said:

No action will be taken against him by Trudeau's government.

The sikh population in Canada has a different origin that lies in the annals of the British colonial history unlike those that migrated to US. Also the population of Sikhs is disproportionately higher in Canada compared to the US. Further, they already carried out a terrorist attack by blasting an Air India planes loaded with almost Indo Canadians in 1985. The Canadian government's response then was 'meh', and don't expect a different response now 

A state CM has been put in jail - what was indian govt response ? Meh. A fairly succesful state (by indian standards) was divided ruthlessly in 2014 against the protests of the assembly of the state itself - does anyone in indian govt even care ?

India is not a nation babu. it is just a bureaucracy inherited form british. Thats fine as long as it does not dicate what people must ask for.

[Telugodura456]

Just now, rushmore said:

For people like you, nothing! Because some might actually try to raise an illegal " Kulasthaani" movement in Andhra out of frustration of losing power. 

telangana ante matuku  anandanga kuppu ganthulu esukuntu ra 

[CanadianMalodu]

1 hour ago, Telugodura456 said:

so whats fundamentally wrong with idea of khalistan ?

Nothing wrong from examining it from a theoretical point of view. But the secessionist ideology is a threat to Union of India, its sovereignty and life and property of Indians. 

It's as good as asking, a separate California or Texas as a country(ies). Threaten the US leadership and the country with violence either within US or outside US, US is bound to respond to neutralize such threats.

 

[Telugodura456]

1 minute ago, CanadianMalodu said:

Nothing wrong from examining it from a theoretical point to view. But the secessionist ideology is a threat to Union of India, its sovereignty and life and property of Indians. 

It's as good as asking, a separate California or Texas as a country(ies). Threaten the US leadership and the country with violence either within US or outside US, US is bound to respond to neutralize such threats.

 

I dont know about california. But it happened in Quebec in Canada and Scotland in UK. Both the countries gave these regions - the right to leave with referendum

In late 80s Soviet union allowed each socialist republic to leave by invoking their principle to leave if they want.

[Guest]

5 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

telangana ante matuku  anandanga kuppu ganthulu esukuntu ra 

Telangaana agitation was there since decades & this latest one was because of TDP & Andhra politicians who stole Telanagaana's wealth left & right. Insulting our "Bhaasha" & "Yaasa", people protested rightfully to get their rightful demand! 

[Telugodura456]

Just now, rushmore said:

Telangaana agitation was there since decades & this latest one was because of TDP & Andhra politicians who stole Telanagaana's wealth left & right. Insulting our "Bhaasha" & "Yaasa", people protested rightfully to get their rightful demand! 

Yes but india loved your yasa and respected your "bhasha" - thats why modi speaks in telangana when in tg ?

Those sikhs and kashmiris were far more braver, fought for far more decades - khalistan was there from 30s when the plan was to divide india in to hindu and muslim regions. Kashmiris fought against indian army itself in 48. Iti not your pathetic langa movements.

[lollilolli2020]

12 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

And that's not coincidence. Not many white Canadians like Sr.Trudeau. 

but they named an airport after him; how come. 

[CanadianMalodu]

2 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

I dont know about california. But it happened in Quebec in Canada and Scotland in UK. Both the countries gave these regions - the right to leave with referendum

In late 80s Soviet union allowed each socialist republic to leave by invoking their principle to leave if they want.

When Quebec separation movement turned violent, Pierre Trudeau resorted to invoking Wartime emergencies act to clamp down such a movement. It's called October crisis. You need to read it up. Scotland's position of secession is not as hard line as that of Irish, or Quebec or Khalistan. Had it been as violent as that or Ireland, the British or English response would have been way different. 

[Guest]

5 minutes ago, Telugodura456 said:

Yes but india loved your yasa and respected your "bhasha" - thats why modi speaks in telangana when in tg ?

Those sikhs and kashmiris were far more braver, fought for far more decades - khalistan was there from 30s when the plan was to divide india in to hindu and muslim regions. Kashmiris fought against indian army itself in 48. Iti not your pathetic langa movements.

Those who oppose Telangaana division are Pulkas because they thought they had financial leverage in Hyderbad. Then they thought of buliding a caste capital in Amarvati but Jagan shred their plans into pieces. If they lose 2024, they will lose their political identity & be lost into irrelevance & launch a "Kulasthaani" movement in the US or other foriegn countries hating India & Hindus.

[CanadianMalodu]

7 minutes ago, lollilolli2020 said:

but they named an airport after him; how come. 

In Quebec not in Anglo Canada.

[Telugodura456]

2 minutes ago, CanadianMalodu said:

When Quebec separation movement turned violent, Pierre Trudeau resorted to invoking Wartime emergencies act to clamp down such a movement. It's called October crisis. You need to read it up. Scotland's position of secession is not as hard line as that of Irish, or Quebec or Khalistan. Had it been as violent as that or Ireland, the British or English response would have been way different. 

It turns violent when you deny them. They are not asking for someone elses property etc. Just their own land based on their majority wishes.

Why did india never held a referendum in kashmir or punjab ? - do you really believes it will happen if they ask more nicely ?