Jump to content

Remembering Mahatma Gandhi - The Most Non Violent Person Ever


Guest

Recommended Posts

mana parents yentha gorrelu kakapothe for nearly 60-70yrs they believed Gandhi and Ambedkar did good. Its just a matter of time , we will know that Godse is the one who fought against british

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

India 1850 varaku less educated people anukovachu but 1850 tharvatha many went abroad for education and know about freedom of thise countries.. india ki vachi ah countrues freedom gurinchi cheppi polarize cheyachu ga … it took 100 years to know our caliber .. world war 1 lo Sagam begging posotion vachindhi British world war 2 lo poorthiga begging position lo undedhi appudu kuda manamu freedom techukoledhu anaty how Indians are habituated to slavery anedhi ardham chesukovachu … they left india due to  international pressure adhi entha thwaraga ardham chesukontay antha manchidhi 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One way in which India appears to conflict with Nietzsche’s theory more dramatically is that Gandhi argues that slave morality dominated India prior to English colonisation. European civilisation is described as a “[d]isease…” to which “[E]nglish people are at present afflicted by…”.[13] By characterising the English master morality as a disease from which India prior to the Raj was immune, Gandhi is arguing that slave morality is natural and existed prior to master morality, the opposite of Nietzsche’s argument. This is problematic as Nietzsche claims to be writing on the “[o]rigin of morality…” in general, not only in Europe and from Gandhi’s testimony, it appears India differs from claimed universal rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Moon_Walker said:

This is the reality and we better accept it instead of thumping chests and showing fake patriotism. Its not only about our eagerness to be a slave its the corruption which is in the DNA and god knows if it will ever go away.

If u saw the movie Mangal Pandey there is a scene when one of the British officers raids a shop for doing illegal stuff but the store owner tries to bribe the officer with 1000 pounds which is like huge money at that point of time. That officer himself is shocked as he never saw that kind of money.

Manollu corruption, shortcuts and zero ethics and integrity society foundation nunchi vocchinaaru. No matter how much ever we shout about Indians that Indians this we will be treated always as soldouts with no sense of integrity and cant treat fellow Indians with respect.

Ee DB lone majority support their leaders based on caste and personal greed and selfish reasons.

TG lo for example okkoka MLA has built his own farmhouse and became his own Nayeem threatening people with settlements, land kabzas, haraasing women and earning like there is no tomorrow.

More than the MLAs i feel disgusting when the DB educated fellows support them saying whats the big deal and they have every right to do so. So problem is not leaders but its people who are rotten,  corrupt and hopeless to the core.

True tg lo leaders became overnight rich and can’t survive in any elections now no need any party 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, argadorn said:

India 1850 varaku less educated people anukovachu but 1850 tharvatha many went abroad for education and know about freedom of thise countries.. india ki vachi ah countrues freedom gurinchi cheppi polarize cheyachu ga … it took 100 years to know our caliber .. world war 1 lo Sagam begging posotion vachindhi British world war 2 lo poorthiga begging position lo undedhi appudu kuda manamu freedom techukoledhu anaty how Indians are habituated to slavery anedhi ardham chesukovachu … they left india due to  international pressure adhi entha thwaraga ardham chesukontay antha manchidhi 

its due to hitler n world war 2 india got independence otherwise india would have been still under british 

I think they would have been super power if thats the case as there would have been huge growth 

canada australia under british still 

british got huge losses due to war 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Moon_Walker said:

This is the reality and we better accept it instead of thumping chests and showing fake patriotism. Its not only about our eagerness to be a slave its the corruption which is in the DNA and god knows if it will ever go away.

If u saw the movie Mangal Pandey there is a scene when one of the British officers raids a shop for doing illegal stuff but the store owner tries to bribe the officer with 1000 pounds which is like huge money at that point of time. That officer himself is shocked as he never saw that kind of money.

Manollu corruption, shortcuts and zero ethics and integrity society foundation nunchi vocchinaaru. No matter how much ever we shout about Indians that Indians this we will be treated always as soldouts with no sense of integrity and cant treat fellow Indians with respect.

Ee DB lone majority support their leaders based on caste and personal greed and selfish reasons.

TG lo for example okkoka MLA has built his own farmhouse and became his own Nayeem threatening people with settlements, land kabzas, haraasing women and earning like there is no tomorrow.

More than the MLAs i feel disgusting when the DB educated fellows support them saying whats the big deal and they have every right to do so. So problem is not leaders but its people who are rotten,  corrupt and hopeless to the core.

venkatesh-aadavari-matalaku-arthale-veru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, futureofandhra said:

its due to hitler n world war 2 india got independence otherwise india would have been still under british 

I think they would have been super power if thats the case as there would have been huge growth 

canada australia under british still 

british got huge losses due to war 

 

Just because they are part of the British Commonwealth doesn't mean they are under direct British rule. 

Understand the difference between the two first and then comment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tennisluvrredux said:

Just because they are part of the British Commonwealth doesn't mean they are under direct British rule. 

Understand the difference between the two first and then comment

who r they bowing to then Mr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, futureofandhra said:

who r they bowing to then Mr

It's not about bowing down they are independent nations however they come under the British Commonwealth.

So they have their own prime ministers, elections etc but the head of state will be the Queen. It is mostly a nominal position as the queen wont interfere in the day to day functioning of the nation. They created this because a lot of migrants to these nations when the constitution was drafted were of British origin.

India is a Republic, which is why we don't have the queen as head of state and instead have a president, which they don't have. Ee maatram kooda teliyanodivaa, pages pages hitabodhalu chesthavu fundamentals kooda teliyakunda

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...