why did lord brahma gave birth to demons ?

[spiritualguy]

Srimad bhagavatham 3.20.23 lo brahma gave birth to demons and demons approached him for copulation later as they became too lustful anta. why did lord brahma gave birth to demons? if they are bad why didn't lord brahma take their soul away ?

[godfather03]

8 minutes ago, spiritualguy said:

Srimad bhagavatham 3.20.23 lo brahma gave birth to demons and demons approached him for copulation later as they became too lustful anta. why did lord brahma gave birth to demons? if they are bad why didn't lord brahma take their soul away ?

Em matladuthunnav bro?

[Midnightsun]

I know only Lord lafangi

[spiritualguy]

4 minutes ago, godfather03 said:

Em matladuthunnav bro?

read srimad bhagavatham 3.20.23

TEXT 23

devo 'devāñ jaghanataḥ

sṛjati smātilolupān

ta enaṁ lolupatayā

maithunāyābhipedire

 

SYNONYMS

devaḥ—Lord Brahmā; adevān—demons; jaghanataḥ—from his buttocks; sṛjati sma—gave birth; ati-lolupān—excessively fond of sex; te—they; enam—Lord Brahmā; lolupatayā—with lust; maithunāya—for copulation; abhipedire—approached.

 

TRANSLATION

Lord Brahmā then gave birth to the demons from his buttocks, and they were very fond of sex. Because they were too lustful, they approached him for copulation.

[Telugodura456]

6 minutes ago, godfather03 said:

Em matladuthunnav bro?

He is telling as it seems to be. This is my internet search results for that quote :

"

TRANSLATION

 

Lord Brahmā then gave birth to the demons from his buttocks, and they were very fond of sex. Because they were too lustful, they approached him for copulation."

[Midnightsun]

15 minutes ago, spiritualguy said:

read srimad bhagavatham 3.20.23

TEXT 23

devo 'devāñ jaghanataḥ

sṛjati smātilolupān

ta enaṁ lolupatayā

maithunāyābhipedire

 

SYNONYMS

devaḥ—Lord Brahmā; adevān—demons; jaghanataḥ—from his buttocks; sṛjati sma—gave birth; ati-lolupān—excessively fond of sex; te—they; enam—Lord Brahmā; lolupatayā—with lust; maithunāya—for copulation; abhipedire—approached.

 

TRANSLATION

Lord Brahmā then gave birth to the demons from his buttocks, and they were very fond of sex. Because they were too lustful, they approached him for copulation.

Ilantivi anni serious teeskunte..

cows and pappu with ghee brthuke avthadi., goinh to stone age or what

[galiraju]

19 minutes ago, spiritualguy said:

read srimad bhagavatham 3.20.23

TEXT 23

devo 'devāñ jaghanataḥ

sṛjati smātilolupān

ta enaṁ lolupatayā

maithunāyābhipedire

 

SYNONYMS

devaḥ—Lord Brahmā; adevān—demons; jaghanataḥ—from his buttocks; sṛjati sma—gave birth; ati-lolupān—excessively fond of sex; te—they; enam—Lord Brahmā; lolupatayā—with lust; maithunāya—for copulation; abhipedire—approached.

 

TRANSLATION

Lord Brahmā then gave birth to the demons from his buttocks, and they were very fond of sex. Because they were too lustful, they approached him for copulation.

I think you must read it further. There was someone quora written about it.

[galiraju]

23. From his hips he created the Asuras who were given to excessive sexuality. Out of the sexual urge, they approached him with the intention of consorting with him.

24. At these Asuras who thus approached him, Brahma at first laughed. Then when they persisted, he became angry with them, and when he found them determined, he got frightened and took to his heels.

25-26, He approached Sri Hari, who removes the suffering of his devotees and who assumes different forms for the blessing of such devotees. And he said to Him: O Lord! Protect me. At Thy behest, I started this work of creating different kinds of beings. Now these sinful creatures of mine are threatening me with sexual molestation.

27. Thou art the one who can remove the suffering of people in travail, and Thou art also the one who inflicts on them various kinds of sufferings until they take refuge in Thee.

28. The Lord, who knows the hearts of all, saw the pitiable condition of Brahma, and advised him to abandon his lust-infested body (i.e. proclivity of mind), and Brahma did so.

29-31. That body rejected by Brahma appeared as a female of exquisite beauty with anklets producing a murmuring sound, with eyes heavy with inebriation, with silk draperies around her waist ……………. The Asuras were infatuated at the sight of this female figure.

32. They exclaimed: Wonderful is her beauty! wonderful her youth and courage too! See how she walks unconcernedly without any emotion amidst us who are moved by sexual passion.

 

His commentary: So there is no direct or even oblique reference to homosexuality per se. The Asuras were overcome by lust and not specifically by a male i.e. Brahma. As we see from the rest of the legend they were more attracted to the woman Sandhya, whom they took possession of. So they weren’t “gay” but rather “bi-sexual” who in the absence of women were happy to grab a bloke! But once the woman came on the scene they reverted to being straight horny guys.

Actually what this Myth (i.e. a story with an allegorical meaning) is alluding too is that the Asuric energy becomes active and inactive at the times of Sandhya. Sandhya is early dawn or dusk. The Asuras are active during the night - so when Sandhya occurs in the evening they become activated and when Sandhya occurs in the morning they become deactivated.

According to the texts on aesthetics (kāma-śāstra) sex should always be indulged in at night and not during the day. So sex in itself is linked to the Asuric nature and not the Daivik nature which operates during the day.

So contorting this episode to construe homosexuality as a sin is disingenuous. Please notice that Sri Hari made no negative judgment on the Asuras nor did he even condemn them, he simply told Brahma to change his body!

[galiraju]

4 minutes ago, Midnightsun said:

Ilantivi anni serious teeskunte..

cows and pappu with ghee brthuke avthadi., goinh to stone age or what

I feel there is nothing wrong with reading!

[dasari4kntr]

Diti (Sanskrit: दिति) is a daughter of the Prajapati Daksha in Hinduism. She is a wife of the sage Kashyapa and the mother of the demonic race Daityas and the divine group of Marutas.^[1]

[Midnightsun]

16 minutes ago, galiraju said:

I feel there is nothing wrong with reading!

I am only interested in exploring conspiracy theories.. like anunakis, qanon, isckon child sx abuse etc… root cause of pleasure in children and saturns role etc

[Konebhar6]

1 hour ago, spiritualguy said:

Srimad bhagavatham 3.20.23 lo brahma gave birth to demons and demons approached him for copulation later as they became too lustful anta. why did lord brahma gave birth to demons? if they are bad why didn't lord brahma take their soul away ?

There is no Good without bad. As simple as that.